Bug#830846: nmu: squid3_3.4.8-6+deb8u2~bpo70+1

2016-07-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 12/07/16 15:06, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 12.07.2016 15:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > [...] >> AFAIK backport nmus should go to the backports team. >> >> In any case, this already got scheduled. >> >> Cheers, >> Emilio > > Hi, > > thank you for working on this issue. The reportbug

Bug#830966: transition: gdal

2016-07-13 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 07/13/2016 04:18 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 13/07/16 13:32, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.1.1. >> >> Like the previous transition to GDAL 2.1.0 (#823335), there is no SONAME >> bump, only the virtual ABI package changed to account

Bug#830997: release.debian.org: Permission to consider dpkg-buildpackage -A bugs as RC

2016-07-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed pending On 13/07/16 18:58, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> Thanks for working on this. I'm all for doing this. But before introducing >> ~100 >> RC bugs, can you give me the intersection of the remaining affected packages

Processed: Re: Bug#830997: release.debian.org: Permission to consider dpkg-buildpackage -A bugs as RC

2016-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed pending Bug #830997 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Permission to consider dpkg-buildpackage -A bugs as RC Added tag(s) confirmed and pending. -- 830997: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830997 Debian Bug Tracking System

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

2016-07-13 Thread Ralf Treinen
Hi, On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 05:19:12PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Hi, > > Quoting Anton Gladky (2016-07-09 16:01:21) > > is there any progress on this issue? How can we help with it? I have 3 > > pending packages, waiting to be built. > > I created a minimum test case from the data that

Bug#830997: release.debian.org: Permission to consider dpkg-buildpackage -A bugs as RC

2016-07-13 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Thanks for working on this. I'm all for doing this. But before introducing > ~100 > RC bugs, can you give me the intersection of the remaining affected packages > and > the key packages? > > https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.cgi >

Bug#830997: release.debian.org: Permission to consider dpkg-buildpackage -A bugs as RC

2016-07-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi Santiago, On 13/07/16 18:21, Santiago Vila wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Release Managers: > > Back in November I started to check and report each and every source > package for which "dpkg-buildpackage -A" fails. > > Approximately 293 bugs so far have

Bug#830997: release.debian.org: Permission to consider dpkg-buildpackage -A bugs as RC

2016-07-13 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist Dear Release Managers: Back in November I started to check and report each and every source package for which "dpkg-buildpackage -A" fails. Approximately 293 bugs so far have been filed about this issue:

Bug#798969: jessie-pu: package qemu/1:2.1+dfsg-12+deb8u5

2016-07-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
28.06.2016 12:17, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 18:19:49 +, Julien Cristau wrote: Hmm. I haven't seen this email back in February. Basically I gave up waiting for almost a year for this, I don't even remember anymore what was in version 2.1.

Bug#830966: transition: gdal

2016-07-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal-2.1.1.html On 13/07/16 13:32, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear Release Team, >

Processed: Re: Bug#830900: RM: trn/3.6-24

2016-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 830900 + jessie Bug #830900 [release.debian.org] RM: trn/3.6-24 Added tag(s) jessie. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 830900: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830900 Debian Bug

Processed: Re: Bug#830966: transition: gdal

2016-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #830966 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal Added tag(s) confirmed. > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal-2.1.1.html Bug #830966 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Bug#827755: transition: kdepim-16.04

2016-07-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 13/07/16 16:07, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > ¡Hola Emilio! > > El 2016-07-13 a las 14:40 +0200, Maximiliano Curia escribió: >> On Thursday, 7 July 2016 21:08:08 CEST Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 07/07/16 19:43, Maximiliano Curia wrote: Everything uploaded, please block the above

Bug#827755: transition: kdepim-16.04

2016-07-13 Thread Maximiliano Curia
¡Hola Emilio! El 2016-07-13 a las 14:40 +0200, Maximiliano Curia escribió: On Thursday, 7 July 2016 21:08:08 CEST Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 07/07/16 19:43, Maximiliano Curia wrote: Everything uploaded, please block the above source packages. All blocked. I have just uploaded

Bug#827755: transition: kdepim-16.04

2016-07-13 Thread Maximiliano Curia
On Thursday, 7 July 2016 21:08:08 CEST Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 07/07/16 19:43, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > > Everything uploaded, please block the above source packages. > All blocked. I have just uploaded kdepim4 4:4.14.10-6 could you add this one to the block? Happy hacking, -- "It

Bug#830966: transition: gdal

2016-07-13 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.1.1. Like the previous transition to GDAL 2.1.0 (#823335), there is no SONAME bump, only the virtual ABI

Bug#829603: jessie-pu: package conkeror/1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u2

2016-07-13 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Adam, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Cherry-picking the according upstream fix solves the issue also in > > Jessie. I've prepared and tested an upload for that and would like to > > upload this to jessie-proposed-updates. > > Please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded. Regards, Axel --