Bug#835170: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-08-23 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 1:28:32 AM AEST Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 08/23/16 16:45, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 11:32:10 AM AEST Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > >> protobuf (3.0.0-1) FTBFS pretty much everywhere. :-( > >> > >> Using -Werror may be a bit much

Bug#835170: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-08-23 Thread Robert Edmonds
Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 8:51:23 PM AEST Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > That's not an excuse for causing disruption in unstable. > > I'm not sure when it is OK to cause disruption in unstable. For example > uploading new GCC seems to cause a lot of problems despite attempts

Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-08-23 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 8:51:23 PM AEST Adam D. Barratt wrote: > That's not an excuse for causing disruption in unstable. I'm not sure when it is OK to cause disruption in unstable. For example uploading new GCC seems to cause a lot of problems despite attempts to mitigate FTBFS. Also do

Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-08-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 08/23/16 16:45, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 11:32:10 AM AEST Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: protobuf (3.0.0-1) FTBFS pretty much everywhere. :-( Using -Werror may be a bit much based on the buildlogs. I think it may not be the problem in this particular case... I

Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-08-23 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Your upload broke building other packages (for instance, evolution-data-server is currently unbuildable). Could you please apply this patch and push to unstable? Without this patch, protobuf failed to build in my sid sbuild; with it; the build succeeded. Thanks, Jeremy Bicha

Processed: protobuf: FTBFS with GCC 6: "misleading indentation"

2016-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #835266 [src:protobuf] protobuf: FTBFS with GCC 6: "misleading indentation" Added tag(s) patch. > block 835170 by -1 Bug #835170 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf 835170 was not blocked by any bugs. 835170 was not blocking any bugs. Added

Uploading linux (4.7.2-1) to unstable

2016-08-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
I intend to upload linux version 4.7.2-1 to unstable later this week. This is obviously a new upstream release for unstable.  It includes fixes for CVE-2016-5412, CVE-2016-6136, CVE-2016-5696. Debian-specific changes include: - For architectures covered by linux-signed, the unsigned linux-image

Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-08-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 00:45 +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 11:32:10 AM AEST Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > > Dmitry, have you tested the reverse dependencies if they still build? > > No... We will have to deal with fallout, if any... It is crucial to have >

Bug#827054: jessie-pu: package openssl/1.0.1t-1+deb8u3

2016-08-23 Thread Kurt Roeckx
The current debdiff we'd like to upload is: diff -Nru openssl-1.0.1t/debian/changelog openssl-1.0.1t/debian/changelog --- openssl-1.0.1t/debian/changelog 2016-05-15 21:16:55.0 +0200 +++ openssl-1.0.1t/debian/changelog 2016-06-11 19:18:11.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +openssl

Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-08-23 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 11:32:10 AM AEST Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > Dmitry, have you tested the reverse dependencies if they still build? No... We will have to deal with fallout, if any... It is crucial to have protobuf-3 from life cycle prospective. Also several golang dependencies

Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-08-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 08/23/16 11:32, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 08/23/16 11:10, Bas Couwenberg wrote: The upload of protobuf (3.0.0-1) to unstable has started an uncoordinated transition. Dmitry, have you tested the reverse dependencies if they still build? I'll test the affected packages maintained by

Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-08-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 08/23/16 11:10, Bas Couwenberg wrote: The upload of protobuf (3.0.0-1) to unstable has started an uncoordinated transition. Dmitry, have you tested the reverse dependencies if they still build? I'll test the affected packages maintained by the Debian GIS team and upload them to unstable if

Processed: transition: protobuf

2016-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-protobuf.html Bug #835170 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-protobuf.html'. -- 835170:

Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-08-23 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-protobuf.html The upload of protobuf (3.0.0-1) to unstable has started an uncoordinated transition. Dmitry, have