On 23/10/16 23:54, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> NVIDIA released the CUDA toolkit 8.0 earlier this month. I'd like to see
> this version in the non-free part of stretch.
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
NVIDIA released the CUDA toolkit 8.0 earlier this month. I'd like to see
this version in the non-free part of stretch.
This will bump the SOVERSION of all the libraries from 7.5 to 8
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:45:55 +0300
with message-id <20161023194555.re6fd7wrrpbxu...@bunk.spdns.de>
and subject line libfl_pic.a needs more than a binNMU
has caused the Debian Bug report #841203,
regarding nmu: flex_2.6.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Processing control commands:
> block 837663 by -1
Bug #837663 [kannel-dev] kannel-dev: Please build libgwlib.a with -fPIC
837663 was not blocked by any bugs.
837663 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 837663: 841839
--
837663: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=8376
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Control: block 837663 by -1
nmu kannel-dev_1.4.4-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "MySQL 5.7 recompile (removes
-lmysqlclient_r from "gw-config --libs")"
Please close #837663 when the binNMUs are in
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 19:45 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - confirmed
>
> > On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 15:10 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Samuel Thibault, on Sun 23 Oct 2016 12:47:37 +0200, wrote:
> > > > As reported in #841714
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #841767 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ebook-speaker/2.8.1-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
841767: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841767
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - confirmed
Bug #841767 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ebook-speaker/2.8.1-1
Removed tag(s) confirmed.
--
841767: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841767
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - confirmed
> On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 15:10 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Samuel Thibault, on Sun 23 Oct 2016 12:47:37 +0200, wrote:
> > > As reported in #841714, a user couldn't use ebook-speaker to read a
> > > .html file, because ebook-speaker was requesting t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #841767 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ebook-speaker/2.8.1-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
841767: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841767
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 15:10 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Samuel Thibault, on Sun 23 Oct 2016 12:47:37 +0200, wrote:
> > As reported in #841714, a user couldn't use ebook-speaker to read a
> > .html file, because ebook-speaker was requesting the user to i
Gianfranco told me that he uploaded sollya 6 already (built
against 5.0.2), so we will have to binNMU the amd64 build of it again after
5.0.3 is processed. (The ftp queue is stuck atm because the host machine is
being moved.)
X
Ximin Luo:
> I've just uploaded fplll 5.0.3 to unstable. This inc
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:17:06PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> 2016-10-23 13:26 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk :
> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> >> Hi Ardian,
> >
> > Hi Bláint, ;-)
>
> I'm sorry. :-)
No problem. :-)
>...
> >> This in many cases also
I've just uploaded fplll 5.0.3 to unstable. This includes some fixes that would
help us package SageMath, which we think we have a good chance of completing in
time for stretch.
I hope this is OK for the release team, I just wanted to save some round-trips.
Jerome who, maintains both reverse de
Hi Adrian,
2016-10-23 13:26 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk :
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> Hi Ardian,
>
> Hi Bláint, ;-)
I'm sorry. :-)
>
>> 2016-10-23 10:18 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk :
>> > Hi Bálint,
>> >
>> > there is some confusion regarding how static libraries shou
Hello,
Samuel Thibault, on Sun 23 Oct 2016 12:47:37 +0200, wrote:
> As reported in #841714, a user couldn't use ebook-speaker to read a
> .html file, because ebook-speaker was requesting the user to install
> "the xml2 package" to be able to achieve this, and the user had it
> installed already. e
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:10:55 +0300
with message-id <20161023131055.fkzlivdx74uew...@bunk.spdns.de>
and subject line ruby-bdb was removed from testing more than 2 months ago
has caused the Debian Bug report #830538,
regarding RM: ruby-bdb/0.6.6-2
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:19:02 +0100
with message-id <1477225142.32722.31.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#840426: jessie-pu: package asterisk/1:11.13.1~dfsg-2+b1
has caused the Debian Bug report #840426,
regarding jessie-pu: package asterisk/1:11.13.1~dfsg-2+b1
to
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Ardian,
Hi Bláint, ;-)
> 2016-10-23 10:18 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk :
> > Hi Bálint,
> >
> > there is some confusion regarding how static libraries should be
> > compiled now.
> >
> > Your bugs (e.g. #837350) say "Please build libfoo
Hello,
Cyril Brulebois, on Wed 19 Oct 2016 15:33:03 +0200, wrote:
> Feel free to mention packages you want to see in testing,
We have the newer brltty release, 5.4, which provides support for some
more devices, and fixes various issues. It has been tested for some time
in experimental and sid now
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello,
As reported in #841714, a user couldn't use ebook-speaker to read a
.html file, because ebook-speaker was requesting the user to install
"the xml2 package" to be able to achi
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:59:30 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#841693: nmu: digikam_4:5.2.0-1 and
libkf5kgeomap_16.08.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #841693,
regarding nmu: digikam_4:5.2.0-1 and libkf5kgeomap_16.08.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi Ardian,
2016-10-23 10:18 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk :
> Hi Bálint,
>
> there is some confusion regarding how static libraries should be
> compiled now.
>
> Your bugs (e.g. #837350) say "Please build libfoo.a with -fPIC".
>
> Why do these say -fPIC and not -fPIE?
I suggest using -fPIC, because then
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 22/10/16 21:23, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hi
>
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort píše v So 22. 10. 2016 v 13:02 +0200:
>> On 21/10/16 10:54, Michal Čihař wrote:
>>>
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #841504 [release.debian.org] transition: gammu
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
841504: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841504
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Bálint,
there is some confusion regarding how static libraries should be
compiled now.
Your bugs (e.g. #837350) say "Please build libfoo.a with -fPIC".
Why do these say -fPIC and not -fPIE?
My current understanding is that a binNMU would recompile the the static
library with PIE (not PIC),
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 14:43:08 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
> > On 21/10/16 18:20, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> >> I'd like to update libcrypto++ from 5.6.4 to 5.6.5; which is a
> >> semi-transition. Pac
27 matches
Mail list logo
