Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:04:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: ITM: Britney2 branch britney-patch-bundle-2016-09 into
master
has caused the Debian Bug report #838514,
regarding britney: patch to speed up loop performance
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:06:00 +
with message-id <93149ea2-28fd-8c76-b670-b41479715...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: nmu: Please binNMU bmusb against newer libusb-1.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #842206,
regarding nmu: Please binNMU bmusb against newer libusb-1.0
to be ma
Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:59:00 +
with message-id <457fbed1-2883-503a-2ace-d15f04dc5...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: nmu: daq_2.0.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #842010,
regarding nmu: daq_2.0.4-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:00:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: nmu: ocaml_4.02.3-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #841938,
regarding nmu: ocaml_4.02.3-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:00:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: nmu: ocaml_4.02.3-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #841938,
regarding nmu: ocaml_4.02.3-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:56:00 +
with message-id <676434e5-89d4-9901-fee8-0f8aeec5c...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: nmu: antlr_2.7.7+dfsg-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #842030,
regarding nmu: antlr_2.7.7+dfsg-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:57:00 +
with message-id <7147607e-5051-eb21-4968-d948198a6...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: nmu: tinc_1.0.29-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #842068,
regarding nmu: tinc_1.0.29-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Adrian Bunk writes:
> This sounds like a problem in apt to me, and I've seen issues like
> that before.
>
> What does apt say for
> apt-get install -t testing libstdc++6 build-essential
> ?
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
perl : Depends: perl-base (= 5.20.2-3+deb8u6) but 5.24.
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
Hi,
bmusb can benefit strongly from being linked to libusb-1.0 (>= 2:1.0.21-1).
Do you think it would be possible to schedule a binNMU for all architectures?
Once upon a time, the format was
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Niels Möller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as a user, I experience a pretty bad interaction between this transition
> and the recent libstdc++ transition.
>
> I have a system with a mix of packages from stable and testing, which
> usually works fine. However, upgradin
Philipp Kern (2016-10-26):
> On 10/26/2016 08:24 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault (2016-10-23):
> >> We have the newer brltty release, 5.4, which provides support for some
> >> more devices, and fixes various issues. It has been tested for some time
> >> in experimental and sid now,
On 10/26/2016 08:24 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Samuel Thibault (2016-10-23):
>> We have the newer brltty release, 5.4, which provides support for some
>> more devices, and fixes various issues. It has been tested for some time
>> in experimental and sid now, so I feel quite safe about it, but it
Hi,
as a user, I experience a pretty bad interaction between this transition
and the recent libstdc++ transition.
I have a system with a mix of packages from stable and testing, which
usually works fine. However, upgrading to the latest libstdc++ at this
point breaks a lot of things due to gcc-6
On 2016-10-26 21:31:26 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Is this situation
> > supported or should we expect things to break? This can easily happen if an
> > app
> > links against a library libA which uses openssl 1.0, and against libB which
> > uses
> > openssl 1.1.
>
> When linking you actually
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:53:56PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
> Adrian Bunk asked whether mixing both OpenSSL versions into the same address
> space works fine. Is OpenSSL using symbol versioning?
Yes, and all symbols have a different version name in 1.0.2 and
1.1.0. (What is actually
On 26/10/16 10:55, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 25/10/16 20:09, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:44:08PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:52:31PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
I'm sorry but I'm goi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828245 828348 828476
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828396 828484 837960 828359 828598 828522 828336 828405
828255 828527 828241 828357 828606 828390 828413 828541 814600 828462 83579
Samuel Thibault (2016-10-23):
> We have the newer brltty release, 5.4, which provides support for some
> more devices, and fixes various issues. It has been tested for some time
> in experimental and sid now, so I feel quite safe about it, but it'd be
> probably useful to have it for testing in d-
On 2016-10-26 19:03, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 10/26/2016 06:46 PM, Gilles Filippini wrote:
I've checked the build of every reverse dependencies. These few ones
are of concern:
* libsis-jhdf5-java : unmaintained upstream - low popcon
* pytables : doesn't support new hdf5 API - popcon abou
On 10/26/2016 06:46 PM, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> I've checked the build of every reverse dependencies. These few ones are of
> concern:
> * libsis-jhdf5-java : unmaintained upstream - low popcon
> * pytables : doesn't support new hdf5 API - popcon about 3000 - no reverse
> dependencies
> * yoric
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Release Team,
I hereby request a transition slot for hdf5 1.10 currently in experimental.
This release ships major changes and has it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 by 828417 828502 828384 828571 828452 828597 835800 828510
> 828261 828299 828414 835785 828536 828530 828283 828260 828593 828266 828561
> 828520 828604 828309 828346 828327 828347 828611 828243 828491 828435 828615
> 828250 82825
We were getting:
find: Arguments to -type should contain only one letter
Fixes the urgency log cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
---
config/debian/daily.functions | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/config/debian/daily.functions b/config/debian/dail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # This block by libcrypt-openssl-dsa-perl was wrongly removed
> block 827061 by 828384
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 841635
827061 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828384
> t
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:47:53 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#842084: nmu: openscad_2015.03-2+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #842084,
regarding nmu: openscad_2015.03-2+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:37:40 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
> Done, including deal.ii getdp slepc4py and dolfin.
Thanks.
> I don't quite understand why slepc and petsc have versioned packages
and use
> alternatives to provide the shared library, but I haven't looked
closely at it.
> Not
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
827061: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827061
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 25/10/16 20:09, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:44:08PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:52:31PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm sorry but I'm going to have to nack this for Stretch, as much as I like
>>>
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:38:23 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#842137: nmu: dolfin_2016.1.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #842137,
regarding nmu: dolfin_2016.1.0-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:37:40 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#842135: release.debian.org: asdasd
has caused the Debian Bug report #842135,
regarding nmu: slepc4py_3.7.0-2+b3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 842135 nmu: slepc4py_3.7.0-2+b3
Bug #842135 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: asdasd
Changed Bug title to 'nmu: slepc4py_3.7.0-2+b3' from 'release.debian.org:
asdasd'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu dolfin_2016.1.0-5 . amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips mipsel powerpc
ppc64el s390x hppa hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 x32 alpha ppc64 .
unstable . -m "Rebuild against slepc 3.7
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Drew Parsons
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: nmu: slepc4py_3.7.0-2+b3
Message-ID:
<147746397798.2727.2988347581649171064.report...@grendel.em
33 matches
Mail list logo
