Bug#840379: jessie-pu: package bash/4.3-11+deb8u1

2016-10-31 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Adam, On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:17:35PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 07:02 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > bash in Stable is affected by > > > > CVE-2016-0634: Arbitrary code execution via malicious hostname > > > > and > > >

Please dak copy-installer 20161031

2016-10-31 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, FTPmasters, please sync the installer from sid to testing: dak copy-installer 20161031 Release team, I already hinted it, and it's migrated already: urgent debian-installer/20161031 KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#842509: jessie-pu: package opendkim/2.9.2-2

2016-10-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 18:13 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Saturday, October 29, 2016 10:31:49 PM Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 17:18 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > This small programming error causes DKIM

Processed: Re: Bug#842509: jessie-pu: package opendkim/2.9.2-2

2016-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #842509 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package opendkim/2.9.2-2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 842509: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842509 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#840191: jessie-pu: package gnutls28/3.3.8-6+deb8u4

2016-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #840191 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package gnutls28/3.3.8-6+deb8u4 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 840191: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840191 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#840191: jessie-pu: package gnutls28/3.3.8-6+deb8u4

2016-10-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 07:46 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2016-10-09 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > [...] > > Hi Stable Release Managers, > > > X-Debbugs-CC'ed Andreas Metzler. > > > gnutls28 in jessie is affected by CVE-2016-7444, GNUTLS-SA-2016-3, > > having a

Bug#837428: Re: jessie-pu: package libphp-adodb/5.15-1

2016-10-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sun, 2016-09-11 at 16:24 +0200, Jean-Michel Vourgère (debian) wrote: > I'd like to upload a fix for #837418 [1] and #837211 [2]. > > Attached is a debdiff against version 5.15-1 that is currently both in wheezy > and jessie. It includes the 2 upstream commits fixin

Processed: Bug#837428: Re: jessie-pu: package libphp-adodb/5.15-1

2016-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #837428 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libphp-adodb/5.15-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 837428: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837428 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: Static libraries - PIC or PIE?

2016-10-31 Thread Bálint Réczey
2016-10-23 16:06 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk : > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:17:06PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Hi Adrian, >> >> 2016-10-23 13:26 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk : >> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> >> Hi Ardian, >> > >> > Hi Bláint, ;-) >> >> I'm sorry. :-) >

Processed: Re: Bug#841979: jessie-pu: package minissdpd/1.2.20130907-3

2016-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #841979 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package minissdpd/1.2.20130907-3 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 841979: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841979 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#841979: jessie-pu: package minissdpd/1.2.20130907-3

2016-10-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 23:29 +0100, James Cowgill wrote: > The attached debdiff fixes #816759 (minissdpd: CVE-2016-3178 > CVE-2016-3179) for jessie. Both CVEs are taged 'no-DSA' by the security > team. Assuming that the resulting package has been tested on jessie, plea

Bug#842744: transition: kodi

2016-10-31 Thread Bálint Réczey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I would like to update kodi in unstable to the 17.x branch and this involves updating reverse dependencies, too. The following source packages need source updates: ko

Bug#840379: jessie-pu: package bash/4.3-11+deb8u1

2016-10-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 07:02 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > bash in Stable is affected by > > CVE-2016-0634: Arbitrary code execution via malicious hostname > > and > > CVE-2016-7543: Specially crafted SHELLOPTS+PS4 variables allows > command substitution > >

Processed: Re: Bug#840379: jessie-pu: package bash/4.3-11+deb8u1

2016-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #840379 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package bash/4.3-11+deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 840379: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840379 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: [gcc-6] Fails to compile OpenWrt/LEDE prereq-build

2016-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 release.debian.org Bug #842710 [gcc-6] [gcc-6] Fails to compile OpenWrt/LEDE prereq-build Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-6' to 'release.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions gcc-6/6.2.0-10. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #8

Bug#842031: marked as done (nmu: lp-solve_5.5.0.15-4)

2016-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:48:00 + with message-id <49aeeebf-c180-a90d-8b29-01c7c49f5...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: nmu: lp-solve_5.5.0.15-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #842031, regarding nmu: lp-solve_5.5.0.15-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#842574: transition: qtbase-opensource-src

2016-10-31 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
I have rebuilt all the non-Qt stuff listed in the transition page. We havet two FTBFSs but both with patches: - Akonadi #842502 - Skrooge #842715 Also both are in our team's umbrella so we are free to upload them once you give us the go. Cheers! -- A proprietary undocumented text format as t

Bug#842506: transition: geos

2016-10-31 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/31/2016 08:08 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 10/30/2016 11:07 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 29/10/16 22:21, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >>> Package: release.debian.org >>> Severity: normal >>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >>> Usertags: transition >>> Control: forwar

Bug#827061: Please commit to OpenSSL 1.0.2 in stretch now not constantly re-evaluateing

2016-10-31 Thread Sam Hartman
My understanding of the current plan is that we're adding openssl 1.1.0 to unstable, but will make a decision about whether to drop libssl1.0.2 later. That's really frustrating for the rest of the ecosystem--our users and our upstreams, and I'd ask the release team to commit now to 1.0.2 being av

Re: Release Architectures for Debian 9 'Stretch'

2016-10-31 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2016-10-31 13:31, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: The only change from Jessie is the removal of powerpc as a release architecture. ...and adding of mips64el. Oops. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.de

Bug#842699: nmu: lirc reverse-dependencies

2016-10-31 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >nmu ncmpc_0.24-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild to get rid of old >liblircclient0 transitional dependency" >nmu squeezelite_1.8-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild to get rid of old >liblircclient0 transitional dependency" they need an NMU (already in deferred queue), so not needed to binNM

Release Architectures for Debian 9 'Stretch'

2016-10-31 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Release architectures for Stretch will be as follows: * amd64 * arm64 * armel * armhf * i386 * mips * mips64el * mipsel * ppc64el * s390x The only change from Jessie is the removal of powerpc as a release architecture. We discussed this at length, and eventually took the view

Bug#842574: transition: qtbase-opensource-src

2016-10-31 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi all, On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:28:17AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > [...] > - I don't know if Dmitry would like to update pyqt5 or not, but he will > handle > that for sure (we are working on this together after all :-) ) PyQt5 just needs a binNMU. -- Dmitry Shachne

Processed: nmu: lirc reverse-dependencies

2016-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 842695 Bug #842699 [release.debian.org] nmu: lirc reverse-dependencies 842699 was not blocked by any bugs. 842699 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 842699: 842695 > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #842699 [release.debian.org] nmu: lirc reverse-depe

Bug#842699: nmu: lirc reverse-dependencies

2016-10-31 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal Control: block -1 by 842695 Control: tags -1 moreinfo nmu audacious-plugins_3.7.2-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild to get rid of old liblircclient0 transitional dependency" nmu banshee-commun

Re: kodi mini transition 16.* -> 17.*

2016-10-31 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2016-10-31 11:08, Bálint Réczey wrote: I would like to update kodi in unstable to the 17.x branch and this involves updating reverse dependencies, too. Please file a transition bug. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer

kodi mini transition 16.* -> 17.*

2016-10-31 Thread Bálint Réczey
Dear Release Team, I would like to update kodi in unstable to the 17.x branch and this involves updating reverse dependencies, too. The following source packages need source updates: kodi-pvr-argustv kodi-pvr-dvbviewer kodi-pvr-hdhomerun kodi-pvr-iptvsimple kodi-pvr-mediaportal-tvserver kodi-pvr-

Bug#842459: nmu: zlib_1:1.2.8.dfsg-2

2016-10-31 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Emilio, On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 11:47:35PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > To clarify: if this one package is blocking your cross-build efforts (which I > appreciate), I can do it. I don't want to end up doing this, then those two > other packages, then some more stuff... Instead, this s

Processed: Re: Bug#835873: RM: openstreetmap-client/14.03.1~ds0-1

2016-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 835873 + jessie Bug #835873 [release.debian.org] RM: openstreetmap-client/14.03.1~ds0-1 Added tag(s) jessie. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 835873: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Bug#823404: marked as done (RM: php5/5.6.20+dfsg-1)

2016-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2016 08:48:23 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#823404: RM: php5/5.6.20+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #823404, regarding RM: php5/5.6.20+dfsg-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#839869: transition: poppler 0.48.0

2016-10-31 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 31/10/16 07:57, Pino Toscano wrote: > In data giovedì 20 ottobre 2016 13:49:55 CET, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha > scritto: >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> On 18/10/16 23:30, Pino Toscano wrote: >>> In data lunedì 17 ottobre 2016 21:11:00 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha >>> scritto: On 0

Bug#842506: transition: geos

2016-10-31 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/30/2016 11:07 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 29/10/16 22:21, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: transition >> Control: forwarded -1 >> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-g

Bug#839869: transition: poppler 0.48.0

2016-10-31 Thread Pino Toscano
In data giovedì 20 ottobre 2016 13:49:55 CET, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 18/10/16 23:30, Pino Toscano wrote: > > In data lunedì 17 ottobre 2016 21:11:00 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha > > scritto: > >> On 08/10/16 20:34, Pino Toscano wrote: > >>> In da