Hi,
I update situation of opencv.
2016-10-23 6:19 GMT+09:00 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu :
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to upload the opencv 3.1 to unstable. This is changed API and
> soname and remo
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
Hi,
The "purify" package was in NEW while the cfitsio transition was going on,
so it missed it. Please do an binNMU for the package now.
nmu purify_2.0.0-1 . amd64 . -m 'Rebuild against li
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: jessie
Severity: normal
Boinc has a functionality problem in stable, the fix is already backported and
I did upload
a new version in unstable a few hours ago
(just to make it backportable with older kernel
Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 21:47:13 +0100
with message-id <72d04012-f8b4-d90e-a988-9e3080d77...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#843634: nmu: supermin_5.1.17-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #843634,
regarding nmu: supermin_5.1.17-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 21:49:12 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#843539: nmu: sssd, dia
has caused the Debian Bug report #843539,
regarding nmu: sssd, dia
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On 07/11/16 23:04, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 10:44 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>> On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 11:01 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 06/11/16 00:43, Luca Boccassi wrote:
On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 22:43:46 + Luca Boccassi
wrote:
> Package: release
Hi again,
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 10:20:33AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > ... metaphlan2-data were in testing at all. These are new
> > > packages that never have made it into testing at all. So it seems that my
> > > assumption that once the package is in testing (and I fully agree that it
Hello,
2016-11-08 16:01 GMT+01:00 Ian Jackson :
> FYI it looks[1] like the libvirt rebuilds for the xen transition have
> been afflicted with the same problem, on at least some architectures.
Given back
Regards
--
Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.
Hi,
> Personally, I'd prefer to start consolidating MATE 1.16 now and I would love
> to see it long term supported by upstream.
I'm afraid we won't be able to add LTS support... our team is too small for
that.
I'll try to submit patches for most important bugs (for example, I have a list
for
Ub
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: failed armhf build of xen 4.8.0~rc3-1 [and 1 more
messages]"):
> I just gave back xen and set an extra depends for the fixed
> version.
>
> The chroots get updated on sunday and wednesday. It seems to be
> easier to just wait for wednesday and give back those few that are
Hi,
>>> Or does something else count as transition? E.g. if some of MATE
>>> packages would change dependency from libmateweather to libgweather.
>>
>> No. This should be fine.
>
> That's fine indeed. Porting your apps (or even libraries, as long as you don't
> break the ABI) from a library to an
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey!
dpkg removes the compatibility symlink /usr/sbin/dpkg-divert. supermin
was hard-coding this path (through a AC_PATH_PROG m4
macro). Ther
Hello,
2016-11-08 11:41 GMT+01:00 Ian Jackson :
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: failed armhf build of xen 4.8.0~rc3-1 [and 1 more
> messages]"):
>> The chroots get updated on sunday and wednesday. It seems to be
>> easier to just wait for wednesday and give back those few that are
>> affected. It lo
Hi Emilio,
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 11:49:19PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Do you mean that it should depend on qtbase-abi-5-x-y?
> >
> > If yes, I would like this to be the case, but as it is a plugin which just
> > implements the QPlatformTheme interface, and it does not use any Qt p
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: failed armhf build of xen 4.8.0~rc3-1 [and 1 more
messages]"):
> I just gave back xen and set an extra depends for the fixed
> version.
Thanks.
> The chroots get updated on sunday and wednesday. It seems to be
> easier to just wait for wednesday and give back those few t
15 matches
Mail list logo
