Bug#844526: Bug#844486: gnuplot-qt: Mismatch between the program and library build versions with GNUTERM=wxt

2016-11-16 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Olly, thanks for your opinion! From my point of view, wxwidgets3.0 should be binNMUed together with all rdeps. Because even a minor source upload of wxwidges3.0t will start this process anyway but in uncoordinated mode. Cheers Anton 2016-11-17 2:36 GMT+01:00 Olly Betts : > However, if you wa

Bug#844526: Bug#844486: gnuplot-qt: Mismatch between the program and library build versions with GNUTERM=wxt

2016-11-16 Thread Olly Betts
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:14:00PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > block 844486 by 844526 > thanks > > wxwidget should be binnmued to fix the bug properly. I don't believe there's actually any real bug here, let alone an RC one. GCC makes small fixes to obscure corner cases of the C++ ABI from time

Bug#840295: Requesting RC exception for stretch for browserified javascript

2016-11-16 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2016, നവംബർ 16 9:22:03 PM IST, Philip Hands wrote: >Pirate Praveen writes: >Is this exception request again for a version of the package that is >still missing source that is being processed upstream with Jison? > >Namely: > > https://github.com/wycats/handlebars.js/blob/v1.3.0/src/handleba

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

2016-11-16 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2016-11-16 12:26:55 [+], Ian Jackson wrote: > If we decide to wind back the transition and the openssl maintainers > continue not to be available (within the short timeframes required), > we have a lot of people who could competently prepare an NMU. NMU openssl back to 1.0.2 or its rdeps to

Processed: Re: Bug#844486: gnuplot-qt: Mismatch between the program and library build versions with GNUTERM=wxt

2016-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 844486 by 844526 Bug #844486 [gnuplot-qt] gnuplot-qt: Mismatch between the program and library build versions with GNUTERM=wxt 844486 was not blocked by any bugs. 844486 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 844486: 844526 > t

Transporte de Carga de Puertos y Distribución Nacional

2016-11-16 Thread Luis Arriaga - Gerente Comercial
[1] web [2] nuestros servicios forum [3] contacto servicios ofrecidos transmaquina transporte de carga y alquiler de maquinaria estimados srs. quedamos a sus ordenes como proveedores serios y motivados a prestarles un excelente servicio en toda venezuela. en caso de necesitar servicios de

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

2016-11-16 Thread Ian Jackson
Jonathan Wiltshire writes ("Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0"): > On 2016-11-16 12:26, Ian Jackson wrote: > > If we are going to wind back on this change we should do it ASAP. We > > should not allow ourselves to make the decision to press on, simply by > > failing to decide otherwise. > > Indeed it's been unde

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

2016-11-16 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
Ian Jackson writes: > Reading that bug I think it's a shame that we didn't manage to > effectively identify the issues we've now discussed here on -devel > earlier, despite Kurt's several messages to d-d-a. Concerns were already raised in June, in the subthread starting here: https://lists.debia

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

2016-11-16 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2016-11-16 12:26, Ian Jackson wrote: In the absence of input from the openssl maintainers, I would like to ask the Release Team's opinion. If we are going to wind back on this change we should do it ASAP. We should not allow ourselves to make the decision to press on, simply by failing to de

Bug#840295: Requesting RC exception for stretch for browserified javascript

2016-11-16 Thread Philip Hands
Pirate Praveen writes: > On 2016, നവംബർ 12 9:46:15 PM IST, Pirate Praveen wrote: >>We now have grunt in the archive, but the upstream philosophy of grunt >>is to force everyone to use a locally installed grunt for each project >>and not support using globally installed grunt (patches for this >>

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

2016-11-16 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0"): > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0"): > > Lots of people have posted in this thread that they see problems with > > our current approach to the openssl transition. > > > > Do the openssl maintainers have an response ? ... > In the absence of input fr

Bug#844526: nmu: wxwidgets3.0_3.0.2+dfsg-2

2016-11-16 Thread Anton Gladky
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Dear release team, wxwidgets needs to be recompiled due to a versions mismatch. See #844486 for more details. Recompiling this package fixes the problem in #844486 nmu wxwidgets3.0_3.0.2+

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

2016-11-16 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 16, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > * Some obscure feature (e. g. BlaBla20) may be missing or be difficult > to support on a limited number of packages (e. g. apache2) ChaCha20 is hardly obscure: if it is to you then I fear that your opinion on this issue is not informed enough to be useful.

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

2016-11-16 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: [...] > OpenSSL 1.0 only > = [...] > * Some obscure feature (e. g. BlaBla20) may be missing or be difficult > to support on a limited number of packages (e. g. apache2) [...] Sorry, it's ChaCha20, not BlaBla20. My bad. --

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

2016-11-16 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > A maintainer should be ready to explain, and if necessary change, > decisions they have taken. (Ideally wider consultation before taking > such a decision would be better.) > > In the absence of input from the openssl maintainers, I would lik

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

2016-11-16 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0"): > Lots of people have posted in this thread that they see problems with > our current approach to the openssl transition. > > Do the openssl maintainers have an response ? I count the following people who expressed concern[1] about this some time before t

Bug#840295: Requesting RC exception for stretch for browserified javascript

2016-11-16 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2016, നവംബർ 12 9:46:15 PM IST, Pirate Praveen wrote: >We now have grunt in the archive, but the upstream philosophy of grunt >is to force everyone to use a locally installed grunt for each project >and not support using globally installed grunt (patches for this >support >was rejected upstrea

Processed: OpenSSL 1.1 is (not) blocking (anymore)

2016-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 827061 by 844031 Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 827061 was blocked by: 828386 828485 828378 828481 828333 828619 835811 828329 828311 828419 828267 828364 828397 828476 828412 828279 828609 828512 828360 828545 8285

Processed: OpenSSL 1.1 is blocking

2016-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 827061 by 844031 Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 827061 was blocked by: 828388 828246 828275 827076 828270 828235 828471 828282 828441 828373 828490 828559 828506 828420 828482 828430 828442 828340 828334 828588 828536

Bug#843905: marked as done (jessie-pu: package akonadi/1.13.0-2+deb8u2)

2016-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:05:53 + with message-id <1479287153.2201.4.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#843905: jessie-pu: package akonadi/1.13.0-2+deb8u2 has caused the Debian Bug report #843905, regarding jessie-pu: package akonadi/1.13.0-2+deb8u2 to be marked as

Bug#842919: marked as done (transition: xen)

2016-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:06:27 +0100 with message-id <42c52df8-3f11-8872-7130-160b741a6...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#842919: transition: xen (vs. grub2) [and 1 more messages] has caused the Debian Bug report #842919, regarding transition: xen to be marked as done. This me