Processed: Re: Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #865212 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 865212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865212 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: tag -1 confirmed Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2017-06-26): > Right, I did that initially but dch complained that it wasn't a > recognised distribution and the DevRef also doesn't mention the use of > codenames. Looks like bugs need to be filed for those two. Be my guest. :) > Attached. Look

Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

2017-06-25 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 06/25/2017 11:03 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Bas Couwenberg (2017-06-19): >> +qgis (2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1) stable; urgency=medium > > Please target stretch if you want to update packages in stretch. Right, I did that initially but dch complained that it wasn't a recognised distribution and t

Re: Buster thaw

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Jonathan Wiltshire (2017-06-19): > I have lifted the freeze in a manual britney run; a little over 1500 > packages migrated to buster. The usual 4 times daily schedule will now > apply. Next time, feel free to lift the udeb block at the same time. ;) KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digi

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Jonathan Wiltshire (2017-06-25): > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of > these suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > 15/16 July > 22/23 July I should be equally busy on all weeks leading to these week-ends, so no prefer

Bug#865355: stretch-pu: package libopenmpt/0.2.7386~beta20.3-3+deb9u1

2017-06-25 Thread James Cowgill
Hi, On 25/06/17 22:46, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > James Cowgill (2017-06-20): >> This update contains a number of security fixes to libopenmpt which >> upstream has specifically asked me to get into stretch. Upstream asked >> me to fix these earlier this month and since none of them looked >> "crit

Processed: Re: Bug#865486: transition: x265

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #865486 [release.debian.org] transition: x265 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 865486: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865486 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#865486: transition: x265

2017-06-25 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 21/06/17 23:07, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > As on every release, x265 bumped its SONAME. All reverse dependencies build > fine > against the new

Bug#864911: stretch-pu: package desktop-base/9.0.3+deb9u1

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Aurélien COUDERC (2017-06-17): > Sure, here you go. (FWIW your mail client announced your attachment as us-ascii.) Anyway, the diff looks good to me, but we still need to see a fix reach unstable before ACKing your upload to stretch, so not going to -moreinfo +confirmed this bug report yet.

Processed: Re: Bug#865484: transition: libass

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #865484 [release.debian.org] transition: libass Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 865484: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865484 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#865484: transition: libass

2017-06-25 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 21/06/17 22:14, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > libass bumped its SONAME and needs a transition. All involved reverse > dependencies build fine agains

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-06-25 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:10:04PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >Hi, > >A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these >suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > >8/9 July (probably a bit soon) Impossible for me, I'm busy all weekend. >15/16 July >22/23 July Both

Processed: tagging 864747, tagging 865225

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 864747 + confirmed Bug #864747 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package anope/2.0.4-1+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. > tags 865225 + confirmed Bug #865225 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package request-tracker4/4.4.1-3+deb9u2 Added tag(s)

Processed: tagging 864292

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 864292 + confirmed - moreinfo Bug #864292 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: openssh/1:7.4p1-10+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. Bug #864292 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: openssh/1:7.4p1-10+deb9u1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping pro

Bug#864747: stretch-pu: package anope/2.0.4-1+deb9u1

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Dominic Hargreaves (2017-06-14): > As per #864668 a typo in the control file means that installing > anope removes MTAs other than Exim. Please consider the attached > for a stretch point release. Fun. :) > Thanks, > Dominic. > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > index c9265

Bug#865355: stretch-pu: package libopenmpt/0.2.7386~beta20.3-3+deb9u1

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, James Cowgill (2017-06-20): > This update contains a number of security fixes to libopenmpt which > upstream has specifically asked me to get into stretch. Upstream asked > me to fix these earlier this month and since none of them looked > "critical" I decided to wait and file a stretch-pu bu

Bug#865270: stretch-pu: package osinfo-db/0.20170225-3+deb9u1

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Guido, Guido Günther (2017-06-20): > this update makes stretch DVDs detectable by libosinfo (used by > virt-manager, gnome-boxes, ...) and adjusts the installer links to the > current locations. You can't upload to stretch with a version higher than the one in unstable (0.20170225-3+deb9u1).

Bug#865225: stretch-pu: package request-tracker4/4.4.1-3+deb9u2

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Dominic Hargreaves (2017-06-20): > I didn't manage to get the fix for #862426 sorted out for stretch > in time and this will cause annoying breakage for new installs. > > It's possible that I will follow up with a fix for #848041 too, but > it's not clear what that is yet. This looks good to me,

Bug#865214: stretch-pu: package gnuplot/5.0.5+dfsg1-7+deb9u1

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Anton Gladky (2017-06-19): > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Dear release team, > > the following gnuplot version fixes the CVE-2017-9670. Please let me > know, whether it can be upoaded to prop

Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Bas, Bas Couwenberg (2017-06-19): > As reported in #864695, the qgis packages cause the jessie to stretch > upgrade to fail due to missing Breaks/Replaces for qgis_customwidgets.py > that moved from python-qgis to python-qgis-common. > > The proposed update adds the versioned Breaks/Replaces

Bug#865122: stretch-pu: package pulseaudio/10.0-1

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Felipe Sateler (2017-06-19): > pulseaudio (10.0-1+deb9u1) stable; urgency=medium > > [ Balint Reczey ] > * Removing myself from Uploaders. > > [ Scott Leggett ] > * Move AGPL-3 text into copyright file (Closes: #863082) > > -- Felipe Sateler Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:03:31 -0400 Plea

Bug#864973: stretch-pu: package win32-loader/0.8.3+deb9u1

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: tag -1 confirmed Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2017-06-18): > As discussed on debian-boot starting from > https://lists.debian.org/4374235.3xk2uo9...@odyx.org , win32-loader > (in stretch) still doesn't use the deb.debian.org agreed-upon mirror. > Also, as it's standalone version embeds multiple

Processed: Re: Bug#864973: stretch-pu: package win32-loader/0.8.3+deb9u1

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #864973 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package win32-loader/0.8.3+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 864973: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864973 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#865695: stretch-pu: package octave-ocs/0.1.5-2+deb9u1

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #865695 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package octave-ocs/0.1.5-2+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 865695: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865695 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#865695: stretch-pu: package octave-ocs/0.1.5-2+deb9u1

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: tag -1 confirmed Sébastien Villemot (2017-06-23): > I would like to update octave-ocs in stretch, in order to fix #865282. > > The problem comes from a patch that needs to be manually updated with each new > upstream version (I know this is bad, shame on us), and it was not updated > l

Processed: Re: Bug#862189: transition: hunspell

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #862189 [release.debian.org] transition: hunspell Added tag(s) pending. -- 862189: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862189 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#862189: transition: hunspell

2017-06-25 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 pending On 25/06/17 13:18, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 07:11:24PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> On 17/06/17 11:29, Rene Engelhard wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> FTR: >>> >>> >From 2017-05-29: >>> >>> 12:31 < _rene_> po

Bug#827061: marked as done (transition: openssl)

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:36:52 +0200 with message-id <768dfc0c-d77e-b15f-8e88-ddd2cbd1e...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl has caused the Debian Bug report #827061, regarding transition: openssl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-06-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi, A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) 15/16 July 22/23 July [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ] Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.or

Bug#865489: transition: libbluray

2017-06-25 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2017-06-25 12:07:56, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:04:58AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > libbluray bumped its SONAME and needs a transition. All reverse dependencies > > build fine against the new version. > > Please go ahead. Than

Bug#847081: transition: libgig

2017-06-25 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2017-06-25 19:29 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wiltshire : > Control: reopen -1 > > On 2017-06-25 16:02, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > >> libgig and gigedit now are uploaded to unstable! >> > > Why did you close this transition request with that upload? The upload > begins the transition, it doesn't complete it. >

Bug#847081: transition: libgig

2017-06-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: reopen -1 On 2017-06-25 16:02, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: libgig and gigedit now are uploaded to unstable! Why did you close this transition request with that upload? The upload begins the transition, it doesn't complete it. Rebuilds scheduled. -- Jonathan Wiltshire

Processed: Re: Bug#847081: transition: libgig

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #847081 {Done: Jaromír Mikeš } [release.debian.org] transition: libgig 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer marked as fixed

Bug#847081: transition: libgig

2017-06-25 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Od: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort Hi Emilio, "Control: tags -1 confirmed On 05/12/16 13:39, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi, > new upstream release of libgig bumps SONAME, so we need to t

Bug#865542: marked as done (jessie-pu: package shutter/0.92-0.1+deb8u1)

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:30:30 +0200 with message-id <20170625143030.xvfmcvm6qdhyt...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at> and subject line Re: Bug#865542: jessie-pu: package shutter/0.92-0.1+deb8u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #865542, regarding jessie-pu: package shutter/0.92-0.1+deb8u1 to be

Bug#865542: jessie-pu: package shutter/0.92-0.1+deb8u1

2017-06-25 Thread 陳昌倬
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 04:16:01PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > There is as well a pending jessie-pu from gregor herrmann, in #863049 > whith at least both wanting to address CVE-2016-10081. We can drop this one since the only thing I do is to send gregor herrmann's work in git repo.

Bug#865542: jessie-pu: package shutter/0.92-0.1+deb8u1

2017-06-25 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi ChangZhou, [Dislaimer: not a release team member, just a comment as noticed a double request] On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:56:12PM +0800, ChangZhuo Chen wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: jessie > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > > Th

Bug#847081: marked as done (transition: libgig)

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2017 13:51:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#847081: fixed in libgig 4.0.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #847081, regarding transition: libgig to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Processed: Bug#847081 marked as pending

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 847081 pending Bug #847081 [release.debian.org] transition: libgig Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 847081: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847081 Debian B

Processed: Re: Bug#864968: transition: libunistring

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #864968 [release.debian.org] transition: libunistring Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 864968: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864968 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#864968: transition: libunistring

2017-06-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 06:37:36PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > The package name is already changed in experimental. I'm not sure the work and > confusion of keeping the old package name is worth it given the low number of > rdeps and the fact that they should r

Bug#864650: transition: mumps

2017-06-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 confirmed Hi, On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 08:32:19PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > This transition request concerns mumps. It has been behaving itself in > experimental and is enthusiastic to play with the big kids in unstable. Time for it to graduate; please go ahead. Thanks, -- J

Processed: Re: Bug#864650: transition: mumps

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #864650 [release.debian.org] transition: mumps Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 864650: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864650 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: tagging 862305

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 862305 + moreinfo Bug #862305 [release.debian.org] transition: libwebp Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 862305: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862305 De

Bug#862189: transition: hunspell

2017-06-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 07:11:24PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 17/06/17 11:29, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > FTR: > > > >>From 2017-05-29: > > > > 12:31 < _rene_> pochu: yeah, I know there's no release yet but I already > > plan what to

Processed: Re: Bug#849505: transition: nodejs

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #849505 [release.debian.org] transition: nodejs Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 849505: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849505 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#849505: transition: nodejs

2017-06-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi, Now stretch is released we can deal with this. On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:49:33AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Transition should have minimal impact on these addons. > Most other pure Node.js modules should be okay - they either > are already compatible with Node.js 6

Bug#865489: transition: libbluray

2017-06-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:04:58AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > libbluray bumped its SONAME and needs a transition. All reverse dependencies > build fine against the new version. Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire

Processed: Re: Bug#865489: transition: libbluray

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #865489 [release.debian.org] transition: libbluray Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 865489: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865489 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: retitle 841733 to transition: opencv

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 841733 transition: opencv Bug #841733 [release.debian.org] Transition Opencv 3.1 Changed Bug title to 'transition: opencv' from 'Transition Opencv 3.1'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 8417

Processed: block 841733 with 865831

2017-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 841733 with 865831 Bug #841733 [release.debian.org] Transition Opencv 3.1 841733 was blocked by: 812032 841370 841411 841409 841245 841413 841287 841406 841412 841246 841405 861122 861194 841416 841410 861270 841407 841408 841733 was not bl