On 26/10/17 19:27, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2017-10-26 10:18 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
>> On 26/10/17 09:13, Niko Tyni wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:15:35PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> perl 5.26.1-1 is in experimental. It
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 26/10/17 12:32, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 10/26/2017 10:52 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> How do you know that there won't be build failures? Did you review the
>> upstream
>> changes, particularly the ABI breaks, and verified that none of the
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #879440 [release.debian.org] transition: gpsd
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
879440: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879440
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 10/26/2017 10:12 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 22/10/17 20:20, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>> Control: block -1 by 878818
>> Control: forwarded -1
>>
On 2017-10-26 10:18 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 26/10/17 09:13, Niko Tyni wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:15:35PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
perl 5.26.1-1 is in experimental. It is binary compatible with 5.26.0
and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello release team,
I have prepared a re-upload of 0.2.4+nmu1 (upload done: 879070) targeting
stretch to fix RC bug #868673 which makes this packaging wrapper unusable in
stretch.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:36:31AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-9-2.html
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> I wish they didn't do that in micro releases...
>
> I assume the rdeps are building fine? If so, go
Hi,
On 10/26/2017 10:52 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> How do you know that there won't be build failures? Did you review the
> upstream
> changes, particularly the ABI breaks, and verified that none of the rdeps use
> any of the removed symbols, removed struct fields...?
yes, I'm doing
On 08/09/17 17:24, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>
> Le 08/09/2017 à 17:20, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>> On 26/07/17 09:04, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 26/07/2017 à 09:02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
On 26/07/17 08:08, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
>
On 21/10/17 17:55, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> hi release team,
>
> the libgps libray has some symbol changes and needs a soname bump.
> buuild failures are not expected.
How do
Your message dated Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:48:11 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #841733,
regarding transition: opencv
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-9-2.html
Bug #879787 [release.debian.org] transition: qtbase-opensource-src 5.9.2
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-9-2.html'.
> tags -1
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-9-2.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 25/10/17 23:40, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release
On 26/10/17 09:13, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:15:35PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>>
>>> perl 5.26.1-1 is in experimental. It is binary compatible with 5.26.0
>>> and therefore Provides both perlapi-5.26.0 and perlapi-5.26.1. However,
>>>
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 25/10/17 10:28, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> We would like to carry out a gnustep-base transition:
> libgnustep-base1.24 -> libgnustep-base1.25
>
>
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 22/10/17 21:26, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> hi release team,
>
> freeipmi needs a transistion - I've uploaded the new version to
> experimental, will
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #879552 [release.debian.org] transition: freeipmi
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
879552: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879552
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #879738 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
879738: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879738
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 22/10/17 20:20, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Control: block -1 by 878818
> Control: forwarded -1
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #879544 [release.debian.org] transition: netcdf
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
879544: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879544
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 866335 by 813083 867028 866504 866555 866700 799635 867010 800709
Bug #866335 [release.debian.org] transition: python3-defaults
866335 was blocked by: 872052 862431 866575
866335 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 866335:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:15:35PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > perl 5.26.1-1 is in experimental. It is binary compatible with 5.26.0
> > and therefore Provides both perlapi-5.26.0 and perlapi-5.26.1. However,
> > four binNMUs will be needed once it
22 matches
Mail list logo