Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 20/06/18 22:34, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release team,
>
> I would like to transition ros-class-loader. I'm maintaining all
> depending p
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #901974 [release.debian.org] transition: ros-class-loader
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
901974: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901974
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Wednesday, June 20 2018, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 19/06/18 21:07, Fabian Wolff wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> Dear Release Team,
>>
>> I would hereby like to request a transition
Niels Thykier writes ("Re: Etiquette about test regression, bug severities,
etc."):
> Ian Jackson:
> > There are some problems with this, though:
> >
> > * The only available bug severity is `serious' which also triggers
> >testing autoremovals. [...]
>
> FTR: If you want to block testing
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
I would like to transition ros-class-loader. I'm maintaining all
depending packages and will take care of any problems.
Cheers Jochen
Ben file:
title = "ros-class-l
Julien Cristau writes ("Bug#831699: release.debian.org: urgency is sticky
across dists - low urgency on sid upload ignored"):
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 15:55:31 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I experimented and dpkg-genchanges -vX provides a Changes file with
> > the maximum urgency of any of the i
Niels Thykier writes ("Bug#831699: release.debian.org: urgency is sticky across
dists - low urgency on sid upload ignored"):
> Britney does not have access to the changelog directly and it sounds too
> resource intensive to do directly in britney.
I suspected that would be the case.
> There are
Ian Jackson:
> Now that we have autopkgtests blocking testing migration, there is a
> much stronger incentive for people to keep their tests passing in
> testing.
>
s/blocking/delaying/
While it is a goal to get it to a blocking state, we are not there yet.
> If one's tests are broken by an upd
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 15:55:31 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I experimented and dpkg-genchanges -vX provides a Changes file with
> the maximum urgency of any of the included changelog stanzas. So if
> you say
>
>blah (2.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
>blah (2.0-2) experimental; urgency=high
Ian Jackson:
> Adam D. Barratt writes ("Bug#831699: release.debian.org: urgency is sticky
> across dists - low urgency on sid upload ignored"):
>> On 2018-06-20 15:55, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> What I don't understand is why it is not correct for britney to use
>>> the urgency of the actual version i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 900522 by 901011
Bug #900522 {Done: Pirate Praveen } [src:gitlab] gitlab:
Security Release: 10.8.2, 10.7.5, and 10.6.6
900522 was not blocked by any bugs.
900522 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 900522: 901011
> block 900
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:40:26 +0200
with message-id <45b90c47-a0a4-2a7f-1aee-f33d43cd8...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#901946: nmu: dovecot-antispam_2.0+20171229-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #901946,
regarding nmu: dovecot-antispam_2.0+20171229-1
to be marked as done.
On 06/20/2018 07:40 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> mpqc3 is not in testing so no big deal. Go ahead then.
Thanks!
Best,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #901929 [release.debian.org] transition: openbabel
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
901929: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901929
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 901155 with 901836
Bug #901155 [release.debian.org] transition: octave-4.4
901155 was blocked by: 901504 901455 901836
901155 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 901155: 901836
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please c
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 20/06/18 15:39, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/20/2018 02:13 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Does that mean that some of the rdeps don't build against the new version?
>> Can
>> you be more specific on the number, the possible solutions...?
>
> sorry fo
Adam D. Barratt writes ("Bug#831699: release.debian.org: urgency is sticky
across dists - low urgency on sid upload ignored"):
> On 2018-06-20 15:55, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > What I don't understand is why it is not correct for britney to use
> > the urgency of the actual version it is considering m
On 2018-06-20 15:55, Ian Jackson wrote:
I have just read this bug report (which affects a situation I care
about) and I don't quite understand.
Adam writes:
britney knows nothing about changelogs. The input is a strictly
chronological (in terms of when dak accepted the package) list of
source p
I have just read this bug report (which affects a situation I care
about) and I don't quite understand.
Adam writes:
> britney knows nothing about changelogs. The input is a strictly
> chronological (in terms of when dak accepted the package) list of
> source package name, version and urgency tupl
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear Release Team,
Please schedule a binNMU for dovecot-antispam to be built against the
current dovecot version.
Regards,
Apollon
nmu dovecot-antispam_2.0+20171229-1 . ANY . unstable . -
Hi,
On 06/20/2018 02:13 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Does that mean that some of the rdeps don't build against the new version? Can
> you be more specific on the number, the possible solutions...?
sorry for not being specific enough. I have tested rebuilding of all the
packages in [1] aga
On 20/06/18 13:07, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to request a transition slot for openbabel (experimental ->
> unstable). Some of the r-depends
> already bui
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #901880 [release.debian.org] transition: libantlr3c
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
901880: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901880
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 19/06/18 21:07, Fabian Wolff wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> I would hereby like to request a transition slot for libantlr3c.
>
> The current ve
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to request a transition slot for openbabel (experimental ->
unstable). Some of the r-depends
already build successfully (for example avogadro), nevertheless, a slot
Now that we have autopkgtests blocking testing migration, there is a
much stronger incentive for people to keep their tests passing in
testing.
If one's tests are broken by an update to another package, and the
increased britney migration delay doesn't do the job (perhaps the
delay is too short, o
26 matches
Mail list logo
