Re: Re-evaluating architecture inclusion in unstable/experimental

2018-09-04 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, With my debian-ports hat on, let me answer the parts related to that. First of all as a reminder, debian-ports was originally just there to help bootstrapping an architecture and prove it meets the ftpmasters criteria to become an official architecture. It has been used that way for example

Bug#907981: stretch-pu: package openbsc/0.15.0-2

2018-09-04 Thread Ruben Undheim
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello, I would like to upload a fix for FTBFS (#880233) to stretch. The same fix has been in sid earlier: diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index

Bug#907980: nmu: evolution-rss_0.3.95-9

2018-09-04 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu X-Debbugs-CC: evolution-...@packages.debian.org evolution-rss needs to be rebuilt against libevolution 3.30 since libevolution creates strict reverse dependencies. nmu evolution-rss_0.3.95-9 . ANY .

Uploading linux (4.18.6-1)

2018-09-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
I intend to upload linux to unstable in the next day or two. This will bring a new upstream version and associated ABI bump. The packaging changes include: * Move config files from linux-source- to an arch-dependent linux-config- package * Remove remaining Python 2 (build-)dependencies

Bug#907906: stretch-pu: package openssl/1.1.0f-3+deb9u2

2018-09-04 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 12:12:56AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > Tags: stretch > Severity: normal I can't speak for the SRMs, but personally I'm in favour of this. In fact, I had been meaning