Hi,
With my debian-ports hat on, let me answer the parts related to that.
First of all as a reminder, debian-ports was originally just there to
help bootstrapping an architecture and prove it meets the ftpmasters
criteria to become an official architecture. It has been used that way
for example
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello,
I would like to upload a fix for FTBFS (#880233) to stretch.
The same fix has been in sid earlier:
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-CC: evolution-...@packages.debian.org
evolution-rss needs to be rebuilt against libevolution 3.30 since libevolution
creates strict reverse dependencies.
nmu evolution-rss_0.3.95-9 . ANY .
I intend to upload linux to unstable in the next day or two. This will
bring a new upstream version and associated ABI bump.
The packaging changes include:
* Move config files from linux-source- to an arch-dependent
linux-config- package
* Remove remaining Python 2 (build-)dependencies
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 12:12:56AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> Tags: stretch
> Severity: normal
I can't speak for the SRMs, but personally I'm in favour of this. In
fact, I had been meaning
5 matches
Mail list logo