Re: please add a chromium-source binary package

2018-10-15 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:41:25PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Ultimately this is up for Michael to decide, as he's dealing with Chromium > > updates single-handedly. > > Agreed. > > > Personally I have no

Re: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-15 Thread Jonas Meurer
Hello, again, thanks a lot to dkg for your hard work to bring Enigmail 2.0 to Stretch! Once again it's amazing to follow your work and see how thorough you are :) On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 18:58:33 -0400 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Hi release team, security team: > > over in #910398, i wrote: > >

Re: please add a chromium-source binary package

2018-10-15 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Ultimately this is up for Michael to decide, as he's dealing with Chromium > updates single-handedly. Agreed. > Personally I have no reservations against this entering unstable, but this > doesn't sound > like something that

Re: please add a chromium-source binary package

2018-10-15 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:00:24AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi, > > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Michael Gilbert wrote: > > > Major updates to chromium in stable have so far been contingent on it > > being a leaf package, where there is no chance for it to break > >

Bug#911114: stretch-pu: package fofix-dfsg/3.121-5~deb9u1

2018-10-15 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu fofix dies with a python NotImplementedError exception during startup. (#873156) Based on the submitters patch I've prepared a QA upload for stretch. The upload to sid was only a

Processed: Re: Bug#866878: release.debian.org: should autopkgtest regressions be considered RC?

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #866878 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: should autopkgtest regressions be considered RC? Added tag(s) pending. -- 866878: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866878 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#866878: release.debian.org: should autopkgtest regressions be considered RC?

2018-10-15 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 pending On Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:35:00 + Niels Thykier wrote: > Graham Inggs: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Dear Release Team > > > > I recall some discussion from dc16 and I see a talk planned for dc17 > > [1] on using autopkgtest results

Bug#911101: marked as done (nmu: kannel-sqlbox_0.7.2-5)

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2018 20:01:49 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#911101: nmu: kannel-sqlbox_0.7.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #911101, regarding nmu: kannel-sqlbox_0.7.2-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Re: please add a chromium-source binary package

2018-10-15 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Michael Gilbert wrote: > Major updates to chromium in stable have so far been contingent on it > being a leaf package, where there is no chance for it to break > anything else. Adding CEF as a reverse dependency would change that. ^^ > On

Bug#911101: nmu: kannel-sqlbox_0.7.2-5

2018-10-15 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal Hi, kannel-sqlbox was uploaded slightly after kannel 1.4.5-2. On most architectures, kannel-sqlbox was built against newer kannel-dev resulting in a dependency on libssl1.1. On a few

Re: Bug#893448: please add a chromium-source binary package

2018-10-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 15/10/2018 19:19, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 12:29:15PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 12:17:21AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: Major updates to chromium in stable have so far been contingent on it being a leaf package,

Re: Bug#893448: please add a chromium-source binary package

2018-10-15 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 12:29:15PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 12:17:21AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: >>> Major updates to chromium in stable have so far been contingent on it >>> being a leaf package, where there is no chance for it to break >>> anything

Processed: Re: Bug#910878: transition: qtbase-opensource-src

2018-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #910878 [release.debian.org] transition: qtbase-opensource-src Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 910878: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=910878 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#910878: transition: qtbase-opensource-src

2018-10-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 14/10/2018 23:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 12/10/2018 18:24, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: transition >> >> Dear release team, >> >> Qt has released a new bugfix release

Bug#909288: transition: kdepim 18.08

2018-10-15 Thread Sandro Knauß
Hey Emilio, > This transition is blocked on blogilo. blogilo is a offline blogpost editor for CMS like wordpress choqok is micro-blogging client for things like twitter IMO choqok is not a replacement for blogilo. blogilo in is dead by upstream since 17.08. and pino made it compiling for

Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-15 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi release team, security team: over in #910398, i wrote: On Fri 2018-10-05 17:48:10 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > I'd like to update the version of GnuPG in debian stable with a series > of targeted bugfixes (most of which are backported from upstream). > > There are four complementary

Re: Bug#908947: youtube-dl: backport youtube-dl to recent version for stretch

2018-10-15 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 04:02:06PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: > Second, I would like to more formally update youtube-dl for stable releases > in conjunction with Holger. yay! > So, what is the way to proceed with updates to stable releases? I've never > done that before. you file a bug