Bug#911512: nmu: btrfs-progs_4.17-1~bpo9+1

2018-10-21 Thread Chris Lamb
Nicholas, > Thank you for CCing me. I build everything in a clean chroot and have > taken care to configure my workflow so that every build or upload > requires an explicit target dist and errors if anything doesn't match. [snip] There is no need defend, provide proof, or even explain yourself

Bug#911512: nmu: btrfs-progs_4.17-1~bpo9+1

2018-10-21 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi, On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 04:01:54PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote: > Ivo et al., > > > > The maintainer uploaded binaries apparently were built on sid/buster, > > > since python3-btrfsutil depends on python3 (<< 3.7), python3 (>= 3.6~) > > > > The package wasn't uploaded by the maintainer. > >

Bug#911518: marked as done (nmu: octave-nlopt_2.4.2+dfsg-8~bpo9+1)

2018-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2018 20:44:08 +0200 with message-id <20181021184407.4vegzsczwigxs...@debian.org> and subject line Re: nmu: octave-nlopt_2.4.2+dfsg-8~bpo9+1 has caused the Debian Bug report #911518, regarding nmu: octave-nlopt_2.4.2+dfsg-8~bpo9+1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#911512: marked as done (nmu: btrfs-progs_4.17-1~bpo9+1)

2018-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2018 20:37:12 +0200 with message-id <20181021183705.jclhtrn7htqnf...@debian.org> and subject line Re: nmu: btrfs-progs_4.17-1~bpo9+1 has caused the Debian Bug report #911512, regarding nmu: btrfs-progs_4.17-1~bpo9+1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#911220: stretch-pu: package jhead/1:3.00-4

2018-10-21 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
Le 21/10/2018 à 12:49, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 22:21 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: Le 17/10/2018 à 11:15, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : Hi [Disclaimer: not a SRM but looking at the proposed update] On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:28:15AM

Bug#910878: Seems qtbase5-dev and libqt5webenginecore5 need fixing in depends to take the new depends in versions

2018-10-21 Thread shirish शिरीष
Dear all, Probably everybody knows it but still sharing for record - https://paste.debian.net/1048385 Apparently qtbase5-dev and libqt5webenginecore5 need to be fixed. Also quassel-client seems to be affected. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this

Bug#911524: stretch-pu: package calendar-exchange-provider/5.0.0-alpha1

2018-10-21 Thread Mechtilde Stehmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello, To upload this version of this package to stretch-proposed-update is intended by the upload of thunderbird 66 to Stretch. See #906730 The new version fix this problem. I

Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-21 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 11:21:36AM +, Georg Faerber wrote: > Hi, > > On 18-10-21 12:05:31, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > That's all bugfixes related to enabling Enigmail and nothing in their > > is itself security-related, so I think that's something for the point > > update, not

Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-21 Thread Georg Faerber
Hi, On 18-10-21 12:05:31, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > That's all bugfixes related to enabling Enigmail and nothing in their > is itself security-related, so I think that's something for the point > update, not security.debian.org That's quite unfortunate to hear, and I don't share this opinion

Bug#911244: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20181003.1334-0+deb9u1

2018-10-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 11:13 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch. > > This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it > current > is useful for all the packages that depend on it. > Please go

Processed: tagging 910969

2018-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # In NEW, waiting for ftp-team > tags 910969 + confirmed Bug #910969 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package firmware-nonfree/20161130-4 Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#911220: stretch-pu: package jhead/1:3.00-4

2018-10-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 22:21 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > Le 17/10/2018 à 11:15, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : > > Hi > > > > [Disclaimer: not a SRM but looking at the proposed update] > > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:28:15AM +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > >

Bug#911494: stretch-pu: package systraq/20160803-1+deb9u1

2018-10-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sat, 2018-10-20 at 22:06 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Let's fix one of the last piuparts failures in stretch by inverting > the > logic in the dpkg hook s.t. it exits successfully (while doing > nothing) > after the package was removed. > Please go ahead.

Processed: Re: Bug#911494: stretch-pu: package systraq/20160803-1+deb9u1

2018-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #911494 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package systraq/20160803-1+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 911494: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911494 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#911244: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20181003.1334-0+deb9u1

2018-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #911244 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20181003.1334-0+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 911244: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911244 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Processed: Re: Bug#911220: stretch-pu: package jhead/1:3.00-4

2018-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #911220 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package jhead/1:3.00-4 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 911220: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911220 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#910371: stretch-pu: package lxcfs/2.0.7-1.1

2018-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #910371 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package lxcfs/2.0.7-1.1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 910371: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=910371 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#910371: stretch-pu: package lxcfs/2.0.7-1.1

2018-10-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 15:52 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 02:21:45PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:18:51PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > Tags: stretch > >

Processed: Re: Bug#910629: stretch-pu: package network-manager-applet/1.4.4-1+deb9u1

2018-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #910629 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package network-manager-applet/1.4.4-1+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 910629: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=910629 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#910629: stretch-pu: package network-manager-applet/1.4.4-1+deb9u1

2018-10-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 01:08 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > I'd like to make stable upload for network-manager-applet fixing the > GObject-Introspection bindings for libnma. > > While we don't have any software in stretch which uses those > bindings, > there are 3rd

Bug#910628: stretch-pu: package network-manager/1.6.2-3+deb9u1

2018-10-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 00:42 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > I'd like to make a stable upload for network-manager, fixing a bug in > libnm0 when trying to access enabled and metered properties. > > This fix was specifically requested by downstreams like Linux Mint >

Processed: Re: Bug#910628: stretch-pu: package network-manager/1.6.2-3+deb9u1

2018-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #910628 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package network-manager/1.6.2-3+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 910628: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=910628 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-21 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 10:43:31AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 17:48 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > I'd like to update the version of GnuPG in debian stable with a > > series of targeted bugfixes (most of which are backported from > > upstream). > [...] > > I note

Bug#911518: nmu: octave-nlopt_2.4.2+dfsg-8~bpo9+1

2018-10-21 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu octave-nlopt_2.4.2+dfsg-8~bpo9+1 . ANY . stretch-backports . -m "Rebuild against octave-4.4.1/liboctave6 in stretch-backports." The octave backport has been updated since the

Bug#911512: nmu: btrfs-progs_4.17-1~bpo9+1

2018-10-21 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu btrfs-progs_4.17-1~bpo9+1 . amd64 . stretch-backports . -m "Rebuild in a clean stretch environment." The maintainer uploaded binaries apparently were built on sid/buster, since

Processed: block 901015 with 910964

2018-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 901015 with 910964 Bug #901015 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf 901015 was blocked by: 908854 900621 901015 was blocking: 900522 903780 Added blocking bug(s) of 901015: 910964 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#906643: transition: php7.3

2018-10-21 Thread Ondřej Surý
Thanks! All look good now. Now, if you can bump php-defaults, so it migrates earlier and kick kopanocore and php-mailparse from testing, and we could remove php7.2 from the archive and be done with this transition. Thank you, Ondřej -- Ondřej Surý > On 20 Oct 2018, at 12:58, Emilio Pozuelo