Processed: affects 915195

2018-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 915195 src:uwsgi Bug #915195 [release.debian.org] nmu: apr_1.6.5-1 Added indication that 915195 affects src:uwsgi > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 915195:

Bug#913069: marked as done (transition: python3.7 as default)

2018-12-10 Thread Gregor Riepl
>    * Depend on python3-dev since we're not building for all Python > interpreters. > Closes: #913069 > > That's a release.debian.org tracking bug, not a bug against your package. > Please don't close such bugs in uploads to the archive. > > In this particular case, I would guess you

Bug#913069: marked as done (transition: python3.7 as default)

2018-12-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: reopen -1 Hi, libarcus (3.3.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Gregor Riepl ] * Blacklisted incompatible python3-sip version (4.19.11+dfsg-1) * Added new symbols that appear with current build dependencies. Closes: #914953 * Depend on python3-dev since we're not

Processed: Re: Bug#913069: marked as done (transition: python3.7 as default)

2018-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #913069 {Done: Gregor Riepl } [release.debian.org] transition: python3.7 as default 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer

Bug#913069: marked as done (transition: python3.7 as default)

2018-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:04:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#913069: fixed in libarcus 3.3.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #913069, regarding transition: python3.7 as default to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#915822: marked as done (nmu: ossim_2.6.0-1)

2018-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:04:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#915822: fixed in ossim 2.6.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #915822, regarding nmu: ossim_2.6.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

glew transition ?

2018-12-10 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Hi, Did something strange happen with the glew transition ? glew 2.1.0 has entered testing, which I don't understand. On the transitions page https://release.debian.org/transitions/ glew is listed as "almost complete" with 24% done (!) Should rebuilds on the other deps be triggered ?