Bug#917053: nmu: openmsx_0.15.0-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu openmsx_0.15.0-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild in clean sid chroot" The maintainer-uploaded binary depends on libtcl8.5 which is not even in unstable anymore. Source-only uploads avo

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: libapache-mod-jk_1.2.46-0+deb9u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libapache-mod-jk_1.2.46-0+deb9u1_all.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libapache-mod-jk_1.2.46-0+deb9u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libapache-mod-jk_1.2.46-0+deb9u1

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: netatalk_2.2.5-2+deb9u1_sourceonly.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: netatalk_2.2.5-2+deb9u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: netatalk_2.2.5-2+deb9u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: netatalk_2.2.5-2+deb9u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Proces

Bug#912659: marked as done (RM: firexpath -- RoQA; incompatible with newer firefox-esr versions)

Your message dated Fri, 21 Dec 2018 18:32:16 + with message-id <1545417136.6236.10.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#912659: RM: firexpath/0.9.7.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #912659, regarding RM: firexpath -- RoQA; incompatible with newer firefox-esr versions to be ma

Processed: block 912465 with 915464 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 912465 with 915464 Bug #912465 [release.debian.org] RM: mozvoikko/2.2-0.1 912465 was not blocked by any bugs. 912465 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 912465: 915464 > retitle 915464 RM: mozvoikko -- RoQA; incompatible with

Processed: tagging 913436 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 913436 + pending Bug #913436 [release.debian.org] RM: personasplus/1.7.8-1 Added tag(s) pending. > retitle 913436 RM: personaplus -- RoQA; incompatible with newer firefox-esr > versions Bug #913436 [release.debian.org] RM: personasplus/1.7.8

Processed: tagging 915292

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 915292 + pending Bug #915292 [release.debian.org] RM: corebird -- RoM; broken by Twitter API changes Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 915292: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

Processed: user release.debian....@packages.debian.org ..., usertagging 915292, tagging 915292

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). > retitle 915292 RM: corebird -- RoM; broken by Twitter API changes Bug #915292 [release.debian.org] RM: corebird/s

Processed: tagging 908405, block 908405 with 915464

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 908405 + moreinfo Bug #908405 [release.debian.org] RM: y-u-no-validate -- RoQA; incompatible with newer firefox-esr versions Added tag(s) moreinfo. > block 908405 with 915464 Bug #908405 [release.debian.org] RM: y-u-no-validate -- RoQA; inco

Bug#913674: release.debian.org: Regression: Recent upgrade of opensc breaks Yubikey NEO support

On Thu, 2018-11-15 at 12:56 -0500, Eric Dorland wrote: > Sorry for the delay, I'm happy to prepare a p-u upload this weekend. Any update on that? Regards, Adam

Bug#915320: marked as done (nmu: php7.3_7.3.0~rc5-2)

Your message dated Fri, 21 Dec 2018 13:05:06 +0100 with message-id <8914f932-e0ad-6832-7fb0-ce6bce40f...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#915320: nmu: php7.3_7.3.0~rc5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #915320, regarding nmu: php7.3_7.3.0~rc5-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#915195: marked as done (nmu: apr_1.6.5-1)

Your message dated Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:58:41 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#915195: nmu: apr_1.6.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #915195, regarding nmu: apr_1.6.5-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#907199: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

The Anti Harassment Team must be disbanded immediately and without recourse as its name is offensive. It contains the word "ass." Unless of course it is a reference to the intelligence of its members. On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 01:02:34 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Mart=c3=adn_Ferrari?= < tin...@debian.org> wrote: >

Bug#907199: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

Pandering to the monkeys is hardly a way to run your organization. Have you checked how many OTHER packages are named with the letters "boob" in your repo? Please. The correct decision is to tell the monkeys to get a life. On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 01:02:34 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Mart=c3=adn_Ferrari?= < tin...