Hi Nicholas!
On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 19:19, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 11:08:52PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> wrote:
> > Hi! For what I understand, at this point, we currently need to:
> >
> > - Wait for calibre being built
> > - Somehow make ci.debian.n
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 11:08:52PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Hi! For what I understand, at this point, we currently need to:
>
> - Wait for calibre being built
> - Somehow make ci.debian.net understand that the latest kdeconnect upload
> fixed a buggy test (so not reall
On 1/2/19 12:55 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 26/12/2018 08:46, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.4.0.
>>
>> Like th
Hi Dominik,
happy new year to you and everybody.
I read your proposal, and the whole discussion with great interest.
In brief, I think that it would be wise to uncouple the fast-paced
("fast-forwards" ?) repository that you propose from the stable backports,
and I hope that you will be able to g
Your message dated Wed, 2 Jan 2019 16:25:32 +0100
with message-id <36701914-a84f-73a5-7834-23ebf0fd9...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#908931: transition: gnat-8, Ada component of gcc-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #908931,
regarding transition: gnat-8, Ada component of gcc-8
to be marked
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
First of all, I'm sorry for inadvertently starting the Corosync
transition. It isn't a problematic one, though: please schedule a
rebuild of sheepdog and dlm on all relevant archite
Hi!
This is a follow-up with an update on packages involved in the
transition.
On 2019-01-01 at 21:47 (+01), Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> ### Dependency level 2 ###
> [...]
> * openimageio_1.8.15~dfsg0-1 => FTBFS
This is 'openimageio_2.0.3~dfsg0-3' now. Gonna test it later today.
> [...]
> ##
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 26/12/2018 08:46, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.4.0.
>
> Like the previous transition to GDAL
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #917323 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
917323: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917323
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
This transition is ongoing, tagging it as such.
On 23/07/2018 11:26, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> This is a transition request to upgrade boost defa
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #904316 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
904316: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=904316
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 917972 by 917457
Bug #917972 [release.debian.org] transition: openexr
917972 was not blocked by any bugs.
917972 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 917972: 917457
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
12 matches
Mail list logo
