Hi,
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:44:13AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Hi the security team,
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 1:53 AM Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > There's the additional issue that ftp-master and security-master don't
> > share tarballs; binNMUs are only possible for package
Processing changes file: firefox-esr_60.6.3esr-1~deb9u1_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: firefox-esr_60.6.3esr-1~deb9u1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org
Please unblock package zfs-linux
zfs-linux (= 0.7.13-1) is 66 days in unstable and there is no new bug
for it.
Compared to (0.7.12-2), the (0.7.13-1) version i
Processing changes file: firefox-esr_60.6.3esr-1~deb9u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: firefox-esr_60.6.3esr-1~deb9u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: firefox-esr_60.6.3esr-1~deb9u1_ppc64el.changes
ACCEPT
Hi the security team,
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 1:53 AM Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
[...]
>
> There's the additional issue that ftp-master and security-master don't
> share tarballs; binNMUs are only possible for packages which are on
> security-master, so we'd need to do manual source uploads for eve
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package julia
(explain the reason for the unblock here)
The current version in testing is 1.0.3, I'm requesting
unblock for 1.0.4 (not-yet-released) because Julia's
1.0.X se
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libqtxdg
Avoid freeze for DBusActivatable apps, this is mostly visable for the panel
at startup and applications started from menu, pcmanfm-qt application folder
or
Paul Gevers wrote:
> Minor changes have been done in installing.dbk (mostly dropping text)
> and one addition in release-notes.dbk. I think we can consider this
> frozen now.
I was going to say "wait, a couple more things" - but it looks as if
all the low-priority checks I had on my TODO-list have
Processing changes file: firefox-esr_60.6.3esr-1~deb9u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi,
Sorry for not picking this up sooner.
On Sun, 2019-05-05 at 11:28 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> The last linux upload via the stretch point release unfortunately
> uncovered #928125, easily triggerble when forcing the kernel to scan
> the partition table o
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #928465 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package linux/4.9.168-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
928465: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928465
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi all,
We're a bit further than last time.
On 31-03-2019 21:34, Paul Gevers wrote:
[...]
> This is the first time that *I* am trying to coordinate this a bit, so
> help me out. Hinted by some notes, I propose the following, if people
> have time to help out.
Thanks for all of you that already
Your message dated Thu, 9 May 2019 21:11:11 +0200
with message-id <3ac79675-b6df-e62a-5b35-d16f647e7...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#928711: unblock: [pre-approval] cyrus-imapd/3.0.8-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #928711,
regarding unblock: [pre-approval] cyrus-imapd/3.0.8-5
to be mark
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #923684 [release.debian.org] nmu: camomile r-deps
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
923684: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923684
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Kyle,
Is this still relevant?
On Sun, 03 Mar 2019 22:04:35 +0200 Kyle Robbertze
wrote:
> There was a bug in how camomile < 1.0.1-3 was packaged that prevented
> packages from building against it. This has been fixed, but requires
> r-deps to be rebuilt using the fix
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 09-05-2019 15:53, Xavier Guimard wrote:
> we are going to fix #927142 (Cyrus-Imapd RC bug). I noticed also that
> there are many spelling errors in this package. Do you think I can add a
> this spelling error patch (joined) or upload a minimal change?
Please make sure
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #928711 [release.debian.org] unblock: [pre-approval] cyrus-imapd/3.0.8-5
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
928711: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928711
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi,
On Thu, 09 May 2019 15:29:54 +0100
"Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-05-09 15:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I noticed an upload of "groonga" to the stable-new queue, which
> > appears to have been prepared by you, referencing #928304 and
> > CVE-2019-11675.
> >
> > According to t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package postgresql-11. The new version fixes two
security bugs, and various other issues. (This is a new upstream minor
release, which would have pushed by the security team i
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
please unblock devscripts/2.19.5 - debdiff (filtering out the po files)
is attached.
Changes are:
* typos in documentation
* small fixes in salsa(1) and a tiny one in uscan(1)
* important fixes in m
Hi,
On Thu, 09 May 2019 15:26:01 +0100
"Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed an upload of "groonga" to the stable-new queue, which appears
> to have been prepared by you, referencing #928304 and CVE-2019-11675.
>
> According to the BTS and Security Tracker metadata, that issue is not
Hi,
I noticed an upload of "groonga" to the stable-new queue, which appears
to have been prepared by you, referencing #928304 and CVE-2019-11675.
According to the BTS and Security Tracker metadata, that issue is not
yet fixed in unstable - is that correct?
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
On 2019-05-09 15:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I noticed an upload of "groonga" to the stable-new queue, which
appears to have been prepared by you, referencing #928304 and
CVE-2019-11675.
According to the BTS and Security Tracker metadata, that issue is not
yet fixed in unstable - is that cor
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock groonga package:
* It fixes #928304.
The bug is reported against 6.1.5-1 on stretch, but it need to be fixed on
testing and unstable package too. so I've prepared the upda
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package cyrus-imapd
Hi all,
we are going to fix #927142 (Cyrus-Imapd RC bug). I noticed also that
there are many spelling errors in this package. Do you think I can add a
th
Your message dated Thu, 9 May 2019 13:52:48 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: unblock: bpftrace/0.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #925203,
regarding unblock: bpftrace/0.9-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag #928223 - moreinfo
Bug #928223 [release.debian.org] unblock / pre approval: otrs2/6.0.16-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
928223: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
retitle 928020 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928020 src:jing-trang
usertag 928020 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:29:05 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> User
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 928020 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
Bug #928020 [release.debian.org] nmu: jing-trang_20151127+dfsg-2
Changed Bug title to 'please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2' from
'nmu: jing-trang_20151127+dfsg-2'.
> r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 928019 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
Bug #928019 [release.debian.org] nmu: wcwidth_0.1.7+dfsg1-2
Changed Bug title to 'please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2' from
'nmu: wcwidth_0.1.7+dfsg1-2'.
> reassign 92
retitle 928019 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928019 src:wcwidth
usertag 928019 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:27:57 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertag
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 928018 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
Bug #928018 [release.debian.org] nmu: fonttools_3.35.1-1
Changed Bug title to 'please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2' from
'nmu: fonttools_3.35.1-1'.
> reassign 928018 f
retitle 928018 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928018 fonttools
usertag 928018 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:27:08 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 928017 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
Bug #928017 [release.debian.org] nmu:
node-unicode-property-value-aliases-ecmascript_1.0.4+ds-1
Changed Bug title to 'please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2' from
'nmu:
retitle 928017 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928017 node-unicode-property-value-aliases-ecmascript
usertag 928017 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:26:11 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debia
Your message dated Thu, 09 May 2019 10:55:06 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock grub2
has caused the Debian Bug report #928507,
regarding unblock: grub2/2.02+dfsg1-18
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # sometimes one just does it wrong
> retitle 928004 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
Bug #928004 [release.debian.org] nmu: node-unicode-tr51_9.1.0+ds-1
Changed Bug title to 'please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2' from
retitle 928012 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928012 node-unicode-property-aliases-ecmascript
reassign 928008 node-unicode-property-value-aliases
usertag 928012 unicode-data-12
thanks
Copy/pasting correctly is hard.
On 09-05-2019 12:23, Paul Gevers wrote:
> retitle 928
Hi,
Ivo De Decker (2019-05-09):
> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 01:07:50PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Please unblock grub2 2.02+dfsg1-18. #927888 is RC; #927269 possibly
> > should be RC since it entirely breaks one of GRUB's platforms; and
> > #919915 causes upgrade trouble if you run into it.
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 928012 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
Bug #928012 [release.debian.org] nmu:
node-unicode-property-aliases-ecmascript_1.0.5+ds-1
Changed Bug title to 'please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2' from
'nmu: node-u
retitle 928014 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928014 wine-development
usertag 928014 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:23:17 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Us
retitle 928008 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928008 node-unicode-property-aliases-ecmascript
usertag 928008 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:21:47 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Hi,
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 01:07:50PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Please unblock grub2 2.02+dfsg1-18. #927888 is RC; #927269 possibly
> should be RC since it entirely breaks one of GRUB's platforms; and
> #919915 causes upgrade trouble if you run into it.
>
> (A
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed d-i
Bug #928507 [release.debian.org] unblock: grub2/2.02+dfsg1-18
Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed.
--
928507: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928507
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
retitle 928008 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928008 node-unicode-property-value-aliases
usertag 928008 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:18:11 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packa
❦ 9 mai 2019 10:28 +02, Paul Gevers :
> I fear you're not going to like my mail, sorry.
No problem!
>> Please unblock package bpftrace
>>
>> Upstream told me 0.9 is the first release where the API (to write
>> bpftrace code snippets) has been stabilized, so scripts and docs will
>> stop break
retitle 928006 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928006 node-unicode-property-aliases
usertag 928006 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:12:54 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.de
retitle 928004 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928004 node-unicode-tr51
usertag 928004 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:10:18 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> U
tags -1 - moreinfo
thanks
Am 09.05.2019 um 10:31 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:06:50AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> Am 08.05.2019 um 15:50 schrieb Holger Levsen:
>>> control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>> Means this I should upload it now to buster/t
Your message dated Thu, 9 May 2019 11:12:11 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: unblock: exim4/4.92-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #926878,
regarding unblock: exim4/4.92-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 9 May 2019 10:54:05 +0200
with message-id <484c522e-e183-c4a1-38d7-c75a94315...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: unblock: yubico-piv-tool/1.7.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #926555,
regarding unblock: yubico-piv-tool/1.7.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Thu, 9 May 2019 10:46:45 +0200
with message-id <101c7a79-07ce-7900-4131-40eacb427...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#928005: nmu: julia_1.0.3+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #928005,
regarding nmu: julia_1.0.3+dfsg-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #928223 [release.debian.org] unblock / pre approval: otrs2/6.0.16-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
928223: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928223
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #925203 [release.debian.org] unblock: bpftrace/0.9-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
925203: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925203
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 926160 wontfix
Bug #926160 [release.debian.org] unblock: ganeti/2.16.1-1 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
926160: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Vincent,
I fear you're not going to like my mail, sorry.
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:18:26 +0100 Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Please unblock package bpftrace
>
> Upstream told me 0.9 is the first release where the API (to write
> bpftrace code snippets) has been stabilized,
control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:06:50AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Am 08.05.2019 um 15:50 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> > control: tags -1 - moreinfo
> Means this I should upload it now to buster/testing?
well, sorry, I have misread your last emails to this bug and thought yo
Am 08.05.2019 um 15:50 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> control: tags -1 - moreinfo
> thanks
Means this I should upload it now to buster/testing?
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package dracut 048+80-2
It contains two important bug fixes. This is the debdiff between
048+80-1 and 048+80-2
diff -Nru dracut-048+80/debian/changelog dracut-048+80/debia
Control: tags 928185 - wontfix
Control: tags 928185 moreinfo
Control: tags 926009 wontfix
Hi doko,
I assume you wanted to tag the openjdk-11 bug as wontfix, not the
unblock bug, changed that above.
On Thu, 2 May 2019 13:59:46 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
> Control:
Processing control commands:
> tags 928185 - wontfix
Bug #928185 [release.debian.org] unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.3+7-4
Removed tag(s) wontfix.
> tags 928185 moreinfo
Bug #928185 [release.debian.org] unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.3+7-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> tags 926009 wontfix
Bug #926009 [src:openjdk-
Processing control commands:
> tags 928185 - wontfix
Bug #928185 [release.debian.org] unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.3+7-4
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #928185 to the same tags previously set
> tags 928185 moreinfo
Bug #928185 [release.debian.org] unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.3+7-4
Ignoring request
65 matches
Mail list logo