Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Hi Emmanuel,
> unblock tomcat9/9.0.16-4
Please upload the package soon and remove the moreinfo tag when it can
be unblocked.
Thanks.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Bug #929908 [release.debian.org] unblock: tomcat9/9.0.16-4
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.
--
929908: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929908
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 09:03:04PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Bastian,
>
> [CC adding debian-ci@l.d.o, please drop the bug in the next reply as it
> starts to become off-topic there.]
>
> On 12-06-2019 20:52, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 08:42:27PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote
Hi,
On 12-06-2019 21:54, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 12/06/2019 à 20:38, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>
>> Can you explain why, please?
>
> You mean why not using the +really version in testing? Because that's
> ugly and confusing for the end users I guess.
I'd still like Matthias to confirm, but that
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:16:37 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#929950: unblock: guile-2.2/2.2.4+1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #929950,
regarding unblock: guile-2.2/2.2.4+1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Le 12/06/2019 à 20:38, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Can you explain why, please?
You mean why not using the +really version in testing? Because that's
ugly and confusing for the end users I guess.
Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Bastian,
[CC adding debian-ci@l.d.o, please drop the bug in the next reply as it
starts to become off-topic there.]
On 12-06-2019 20:52, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 08:42:27PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> On 12-06-2019 20:01, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> I'm also not sure if the
Hi Paul
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 08:42:27PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 12-06-2019 20:01, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > I'm also not sure if the Debian autopkgtest infrastructure would be able
> > to do that and build images. The actual testing runs via the Gitlab
> > CI.[1]
> You could very probabl
Hi Bastian,
On 12-06-2019 20:01, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The code in the package is not used to actually build the images we
> release for Debian. We use the unreleased code from the git repository
> to do all the automated stuff.
>
> I'm also not sure if the Debian autopkgtest infrastructure wou
Hi Matthias,
On 12-06-2019 10:33, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I talked to Matthias on IRC yesterday, he was ok with the +really
> version in unstable only as a testbed for a tpu upload with a sane version.
Can you explain why, please?
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 05:57:00PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> If you create such a package, having a binary per architecture as you
> describe, should do what you want. It can be added to the list as soon as it
> is in testing.
Okay, thank you.
> Also, just as a suggestion: if it is feasib
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello,
please accept libgd2 2.2.5-5.2 into stretch-proposed-updates.
libgd2 2.2.5-5.2 is a security upload that fixes CVE-2019-11038. Even
though the bug severity is only 'impor
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libgd2
libgd2 2.2.5-5.2 is a security upload that fixes CVE-2019-11038. Even
though the bug severity is only 'important', it would be nice to have
this security fix i
Control: retitle -1 Add key package for cloud images
Hi,
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 12:18:31PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> To make your and our work easier, we would like to ask you to add a
> package constraint for all the packages included into the official
> Debianm cloud images.
>
> From what
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 Add key package for cloud images
Bug #929214 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org - Add package constraint
for cloud images
Changed Bug title to 'Add key package for cloud images' from
'release.debian.org - Add package constraint for cloud images'.
-
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 17:24:59 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: unblock: mailman-suite/0+20180916-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #930222,
regarding unblock: mailman-suite/0+20180916-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 17:15:29 +0200
with message-id <20190612151528.irrdn6bl4wqn7...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: unblock: usrmerge/22
has caused the Debian Bug report #930394,
regarding unblock: usrmerge/22
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:16:04 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock whois
has caused the Debian Bug report #930429,
regarding unblock: whois/5.4.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #930222 [release.debian.org] unblock: mailman-suite/0+20180916-9
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
930222: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930222
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 05:45:56PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Sorry to prod you again, but while working on mailman-suite I just
> realized that the build-time dependency on node-less is completely
> useless. So I now dropped it in a subsequent upload. I don't plan
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:52:47 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock graphite-web
has caused the Debian Bug report #930110,
regarding unblock: graphite-web/1.1.4-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:54:36 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock nextcloud-desktop
has caused the Debian Bug report #930197,
regarding unblock: nextcloud-desktop/2.5.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:55:39 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock libmediainfo
has caused the Debian Bug report #930209,
regarding unblock: libmediainfo/18.12-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:50:00 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock cyrus-imapd
has caused the Debian Bug report #930107,
regarding unblock: cyrus-imapd/3.0.8-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Le 07/06/2019 à 07:08, Xavier Guimard a écrit :
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package cyrus-imapd
>
> Hi all,
>
> Cyrus-Imapd is vulnerable to remote arbitrary code execution via CalDAV
> (CV
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:44:25 +0200
with message-id <20190612144423.6vusfizpkz6lq...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: unblock: several autopkgtest fixes for node-*
has caused the Debian Bug report #929874,
regarding unblock: several autopkgtest fixes for node-*
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:39:38 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock radicale
has caused the Debian Bug report #929873,
regarding unblock: radicale/2.1.11-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:15:57 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock gvfs
has caused the Debian Bug report #930364,
regarding unblock: gvfs/1.38.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:14:40 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock libdmtx
has caused the Debian Bug report #930418,
regarding unblock: libdmtx
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 04:06:30PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>> Please unblock package nageru
> I unblocked it, but noticed it's stuck behind gcc-8. Can you prepare a
> testing-proposed-updates upload?
Sure! I'll upload tonight.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:12:17 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock d3-format
has caused the Debian Bug report #930425,
regarding unblock: d3-format/1:1.0.2-3.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #930324 {Done: Ivo De Decker }
[release.debian.org] unblock: nageru/1.8.4-2
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #930324 to the same values
previously set
--
930324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930324
De
Control: reopen -1
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:44:07PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Please unblock package nageru
I unblocked it, but noticed it's stuck behind gcc-8. Can you prepare a
testing-proposed-updates upload?
Thanks,
Ivo
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:59:59 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock nageru
has caused the Debian Bug report #930324,
regarding unblock: nageru/1.8.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:01:47 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock haskell-argon2
has caused the Debian Bug report #930377,
regarding unblock: haskell-argon2/1.3.0.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:53:09 +0200
with message-id <20190612135305.rmfvzrm7xxtzz...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: unblock: dcmtk/3.6.4-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #930275,
regarding unblock: dcmtk/3.6.4-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:51:25 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock zookeeper
has caused the Debian Bug report #930106,
regarding unblock: zookeeper/3.4.13-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package whois because RIPE was assigned a new network by
IANA and without this change it will report all newly allocated networks
in Europe as "unknown" (es: "whois 2a10:000
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Dear Release Team,
D3-format 1:1.0.2-3.1 fixes one single RC bug, please consider unblocking it.
Changes:
d3-format (1:1.0.2-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload (Closes: #929617)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I'd like to upload an update to stretch's grub2 which adds support for
booting Xen on UEFI hosts. This consists of four straight cherry-picks
from upstream (somewhat complex, but m
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libdmtx to fix silly RC bug in copyright.
unblock libdmtx/0.7.5-3
diff -Nru libdmtx-0.7.5/debian/changelog libdmtx-0.7.5/debian/changelog
--- libdmtx-0.7.5/debian/ch
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi
this updates libvirt's cpu map to make addressing
CVE-2018-3639, CVE-2017-5753, CVE-2017-5715, CVE-2018-12126,
CVE-2018-12127, CVE-2018-12130, CVE-2019-11091
easier for our use
Le 12/06/2019 à 07:09, tony mancill a écrit :
> Regarding t-p-u and/or unstable, a source package and build of
> 11.0.4+4+really11.0.3+7 can be found here:
>
> https://people.debian.org/~tmancill/openjdk-11/
Thank you!
> The interdiff [1] between this build and the 11.0.3+7-5 discussed
> pre
Le 12/06/2019 à 00:37, Moritz Mühlenhoff a écrit :
> I'm also fairly sure we've shipped non-GA releases for openjdk-8 before?
That's true but the situation for OpenJDK 8 was slightly different. The
GA releases weren't clearly identified by upstream and the code for
alternative architectures (aarc
44 matches
Mail list logo
