Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 931596 - moreinfo
Bug #931596 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
libjavascript-beautifier-perl/0.25-1+deb10u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
931596: https://bug
Control: tags - moreinfo
Le 22/07/2019 à 01:31, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 07:04:20AM +0200, Xavier Guimard wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> Tags: buster
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 931596 buster-pu: package libjavascript-beautifier-perl/0.25-1+deb10u1
Bug #931596 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
libjavascript-beautifier-perl/0.25-1+deb10u1
Ignoring request to change the title of bug#931596 to the same title
>
Processing changes file: warzone2100_3.2.1-3+deb10u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: warzone2100_3.2.1-3+deb10u1_mips64el.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libblockdev_2.20-7+deb10u1_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libblockdev_2.20-7+deb10u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libblockdev_2.20-7+deb10u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libblockdev_2.20-7+deb10u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
P
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 2:44 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
> So, now you've seen how I have perceived the freeze, do you have
> anything to add? We're looking for concrete notes and observations that
> we can use when we think about how to improve the bullseye release.
During the buster freeze period, po
Jonathan Wiltshire (2019-07-21):
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 07:36:55PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: stretch
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: pu
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > As reported on #917909, the text-bas
Processing changes file: warzone2100_3.2.1-3+deb10u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 03:04:40PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> The librsync library changed the ABI and also some parts of API, the API
> change
> impacts only rdiff-backup, for which #928885 is filed with no reaction so far.
Please go ahead in unstable.
Thanks,
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #932618 [release.debian.org] transition: librsync
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
932618: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932618
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #931198 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package warzone2100/3.2.1-3+deb10u1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #931198 to the same tags previously set
--
931198: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931198
Debian Bug Tracking S
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #931198 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package warzone2100/3.2.1-3+deb10u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
931198: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931198
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: warzone2100
Version: 3.2.1-3+deb10u1
Explanation: fix a segmentation
Processing changes file: libblockdev_2.20-7+deb10u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
So apparently I missed the memo and my first round of packages uploaded to
unstable after the release have not been built on a buildd.
Could it be possible to binNMU them?
libsepol
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #932588 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package libblockdev/2.20-7+deb10u1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #932588 to the same tags previously set
--
932588: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932588
Debian Bug Tracking Sy
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #932588 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package libblockdev/2.20-7+deb10u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
932588: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932588
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: libblockdev
Version: 2.20-7+deb10u1
Explanation: use existing crypts
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:55:20AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > Please allow me to fixup OVS's missing python3-six dependency, and add
> > support for fixing the MTU of OVS devices. The attached patch is quite
> > minimalistic. This also adds a bit of doc on how to set
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #931766 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
openvswitch/2.10.0+2018.08.28+git.8ca7c82b7d+ds1-13
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
931766: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931766
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:47:07AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Please accept the update of python-autobahn fixing a problem in the
> (build-)dependencies. Debdiff attached.
err... oops?
Please go ahead.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #931596 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
libjavascript-beautifier-perl/0.25-1+deb10u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
931596: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931596
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #931615 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
python-autobahn/17.10.1+dfsg1-3+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
931615: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931615
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 07:04:20AM +0200, Xavier Guimard wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: buster
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
Your metadata above, bug title, and changelog target all disagree about
wheth
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:54:53AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Please allow me to fix puppet-module-cinder in Buster. The attached debdiff
> shows that, when using the CEPH backend, puppet-cinder attemps to write in
> /etc/init, which fails since we don't have this ups
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #931616 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
puppet-module-cinder/13.1.0-3+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
931616: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931616
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 07:36:55PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: stretch
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Hello,
>
> As reported on #917909, the text-based debian installer support for
> right-to-left langua
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 05:35:53PM -0300, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 11:55:59AM -0300, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > This makes me think to decrease the delay for reproducible packages
> > rather than increase the delay for unreproducible ones? Though then
> > you'd want it
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 11:55:59AM -0300, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> This makes me think to decrease the delay for reproducible packages
> rather than increase the delay for unreproducible ones? Though then
> you'd want it to be a small increment...
How about if the current bonus of three days is
On Sunday, July 21, 2019 4:15:43 PM EDT Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 08:00:20PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Thanks. It looks plausible. As doko mentioned, it'll need the same for
> > build depends.
>
> It already has the .build-depends, the answer to that is what I w
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 08:00:20PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Thanks. It looks plausible. As doko mentioned, it'll need the same for
> build depends.
It already has the .build-depends, the answer to that is what I was waiting
for.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
Thanks. It looks plausible. As doko mentioned, it'll need the same for build
depends.
Scott K
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python2-rm.html
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 11:15:31AM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>
> On July 9, 2019 8:19:03 AM UTC, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> >Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 06:31:50PM -0
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: affects -1 src:gnupg2
The version of GnuPG in debian buster (2.2.12-1) has a number of
outstanding bugs related to OpenPGP certificate management and network
access. Many o
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python2-rm.html
Bug #931659 [release.debian.org] transition: rm python2
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python2-rm.html'.
--
931659: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:gnupg2
Bug #932684 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.12-1+deb10u1
Added indication that 932684 affects src:gnupg2
--
932684: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932684
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debia
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I'd like to make a stable upload for stretch.
It fixes an issue in networkd, which is not enabled by default, but
apparently sees increased usage, so it seems worthwile fixing
On 2019-07-21, Chris Lamb wrote:
> So, the devil is very much in the details here, alas. Whilst I am a
> definite +1 on this idea the day-to-day experience may not be ideal
> so your thoughts are very welcome.
>
> Just to take one recent example: I noticed yesterday a regression
> whereby one of ou
Hi Ben,
Sorry for not getting back to you about this earlier.
On 7/7/19 3:43 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2019-07-07 at 02:47 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
[...]
No binary maintainer uploads for bullseye
=
The release of buster also means the bul
Dear Ivo et al.,
Thanks for reaching out.
So, the devil is very much in the details here, alas. Whilst I am a
definite +1 on this idea the day-to-day experience may not be ideal
so your thoughts are very welcome.
Just to take one recent example: I noticed yesterday a regression
whereby one of ou
Hi reproducible builds team,
The release team is planning to revisit the testing migration aging
policy in the near future. The details haven't been worked out yet, but
we are considering to use reproducibility of packages as one of the new
factors that could influence the aging.
For this to
On Sat 2019-07-20 21:41:12 -0300, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 01:21:22PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On Sun 2019-06-30 20:01:21 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> > The time for unblocks for buster has come and gone. The deadline was
>> > last Tuesday, we are now
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
The librsync library changed the ABI and also some parts of API, the API change
impacts only rdiff-backup, for which #928885 is filed with no reaction so far.
I've tested all revdeps, th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Bug #932240 in debhelper 12.2 has caused missing dependencies in
packages with setuid/setgid binaries. At least the tcptraceroute
package is affected by this bug, see #932603. But there cou
Some recent bugs that seem to have been caused by this:
#898245 src:flask-limiter-> python-aniso8601
#932507 src:python-crontab-> python-croniter
#932509 src:pyrsample-> python-xarray
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi all,
node-mixin-deep is vulnerable to prototype pollution (#932500,
CVE-2019-10746). Here is a proposed update.
Cheers,
Xavier
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
i
46 matches
Mail list logo
