Bug#939446: buster-pu: package emacs/1:26.1+1-3.2

2019-09-19 Thread Rob Browning
Andreas Beckmann writes: > On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 22:02:59 -0500 Rob Browning > wrote: >> Rob Browning writes: >> > emacs (1:26.1+1-3.2+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium >> > >> > * Update the EPLA packaging key (previous key expires 2019-09-23) via > > You probably want to include the fixes f

Processed: tagging 940685

2019-09-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 940685 - security Bug #940685 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: libsixel/1.8.2-1+deb10u1 Removed tag(s) security. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 940685: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Bug#940685: buster-pu: libsixel/1.8.2-1+deb10u1

2019-09-19 Thread Takatsugu Nokubi
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 09:46:30 +0900 NOKUBI Takatsugu wrote: > I'll upload a new version of libsixel for buster. > It contains many security fix reported by #931311 The package is insufficient, so we updated the package source. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/uim/commit/374d44663f4c477db91ffa1dfb01

Bug#940715: stretch-pu: package nodejs-mozilla 8.11.1~dfsg-2~deb9u1

2019-09-19 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, Another package needed for firefox-esr 68. I didn't want to update src:nodejs to a newer version, so just like for nasm-mozilla this introduces a newer version as nodejs-mozill

Bug#940714: stretch-pu: package llvm-toolchain-7 7.0.1-8~deb9u3

2019-09-19 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, I have uploaded a new revision of llvm-toolchain-7 to address the s390x and mips64el build failures. I couldn't properly test the mips64el fix on the porterbox as I was getting

Bug#940686: buster-pu: package uim_1.8.8-4+deb10u2

2019-09-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 07:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > What's your plan for bullseye? If the package is indeed intended to > be > transitional then exactly the same scenario will occur once users > upgrade from buster to bullseye and then purge the package. > Ignore that bit, I obviously nee