Ping? nginx and the perl transition

2019-10-10 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
Hello nginx maintainers. Please would you be able to look at this bug soon? I believe It's currently the main thing preventing the perl transition from completing. If not, I can try and look at it, but it might not be before the weekend and it would be good if the transition was completed by

Bug#942095: nmu: rebuild packages for binutils 2.33

2019-10-10 Thread Stephen Kitt
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:51:47 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > also, binutils-mingw64 might need a sourceful upload. A binNMU would have worked, but I had some changes queued up so I uploaded them. There’s also binutils-djgpp now ;-). Regards, Stephen pgpWHgyv7GT1D.pgp Description: OpenPGP

Bug#942143: marked as done (buster-pu: package apache2/2.4.38-3+deb10u2)

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Oct 2019 22:16:08 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: buster-pu: package apache2/2.4.38-3+deb10u2 has caused the Debian Bug report #942143, regarding buster-pu: package apache2/2.4.38-3+deb10u2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#942143: buster-pu: package apache2/2.4.38-3+deb10u2

2019-10-10 Thread Xavier
Le 10/10/2019 à 22:04, Xavier Guimard a écrit : > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: buster > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Hi, > > CVE-2019-10092 patch added a regression (#941202). This patch fixes it > (taken from >

Bug#942143: buster-pu: package apache2/2.4.38-3+deb10u2

2019-10-10 Thread Xavier Guimard
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, CVE-2019-10092 patch added a regression (#941202). This patch fixes it (taken from

Bug#940112: buster-pu: package quota/4.04-2+deb10u1

2019-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 14:50 +0100, Mark Hymers wrote: > quota in buster has a bug (#931855) where rpc.rquotad permanently > spins > at 100% CPU. This bug is fixed in 4.05-1 (unstable) and there is a > targeted fix available for 4.04. I have spoken to the maintainer

Processed: Re: Bug#940112: buster-pu: package quota/4.04-2+deb10u1

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #940112 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package quota/4.04-2+deb10u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 940112: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940112 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: retitle 942104 to britney: fails if Release file missing "Suite" field

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 942104 britney: fails if Release file missing "Suite" field Bug #942104 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Will fail if "Suite" field is missing Changed Bug title to 'britney: fails if Release file missing "Suite" field' from

Bug#942110: stretch-pu: package gnustep-base/1.24.9-3.1+deb9u1

2019-10-10 Thread Yavor Doganov
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu I'd like to fix a vulnerability in the gdomap daemon (no DSA). It is fixed in testing/unstable and already approved/uploaded for buster (release.d.o #940943). The patch is the

Processed: Re: release.debian.org: Will fail if "Suite" field is missing

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + patch Bug #942104 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Will fail if "Suite" field is missing Added tag(s) patch. -- 942104: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942104 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#942104: release.debian.org: Will fail if "Suite" field is missing

2019-10-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: tag -1 + patch On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Ansgar wrote: > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianRepository/Format#A.22Release.22_files > says one of Suite and Codename is required. Codename itself is not required. Ok. > I wouldn't be surprised if many tools just use one and assume it always >

Processed: severity of 942104 is wishlist

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 942104 wishlist Bug #942104 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Will fail if "Suite" field is missing Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#942104: release.debian.org: Will fail if "Suite" field is missing

2019-10-10 Thread Ansgar
> britney assumes that if you have a Release file, it will contain a "Suite" > field. That's not true, the "Codename" entry is required but the "Suite" > one is optional. https://wiki.debian.org/DebianRepository/Format#A.22Release.22_files says one of Suite and Codename is required. Codename

Bug#942106: (some kind of) transition: add python3.8 as a supported python3 version

2019-10-10 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Please setup a tracker to add python3.8 as a supported python3 version. This is non-blocking, as packages can migrate on their own once built. I'm not yet starting this, just want to

Bug#942104: release.debian.org: Will fail if "Suite" field is missing

2019-10-10 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney britney assumes that if you have a Release file, it will contain a "Suite" field. That's not true, the "Codename" entry is required but the "Suite" one is optional. Please handle properly

Bug#917972: marked as done (transition: openexr)

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Oct 2019 13:18:42 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#917972: transition: openexr has caused the Debian Bug report #917972, regarding transition: openexr to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2019-10-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: block -1 by 922566 Control: block -1 by 922569 Control: block -1 by 922570 Control: block -1 by 922573 Control: block -1 by 922574 Control: block -1 by 922578 Control: block -1 by 922579 Control: block -1 by 922582 Control: block -1 by 922583 Control: block -1 by 922584 Control: block -1

Processed: Re: Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 922566 Bug #915721 [release.debian.org] transition: opencv 915721 was not blocked by any bugs. 915721 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 915721: 922566 > block -1 by 922569 Bug #915721 [release.debian.org] transition: opencv 915721 was

Uw Sinterklaaszakjes op maat - Vos sachets St-Nicolas personnalisés

2019-10-10 Thread DIPPRO bvba-sprl
Voor uw personeel en/of voor uw klanten…. is de Sint er weer !!! Pour votre personnel et/ou pour vos clients… St-Nicolas est de retour          Meer info – Plus d’info : 02-583.56.40   Prijsaanvraag : i...@dippro.beof click hier Demande de prix : i...@dippro.beou cliquez ici     De

Bug#942095: nmu: rebuild packages for binutils 2.33

2019-10-10 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please binNMU these packages for the binutils 2.33 upload to unstable: naev 0.7.0-2 wcc 0.0.2+dfsg-3 (amd64 only) looking-glass 0+b1-1 kcov 36+dfsg-1 also, binutils-mingw64 might need a