In the time since I created the original .debdiff, I have moved the
ntpsec packaging from GitHub to Salsa and switched to DEP-14 branch naming.
Attached is a refreshed .debdiff.2 and an .interdiff comparing that to
the first .debdiff. The only changes are the Vcs-* and debian/gbp.conf
changes rela
Hey pino,
> > Why this is not built and shipped and still we have the dependency?
>
> I do not see any akonadi dependency in the binary packages, can you
> please explain exactly what you see?
what I mean is, if it is only checked at buildtime but no binary package
depend on it, why it was adde
Bastian Blank writes:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:10:11AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> +The Release Team may, at their discretion, downgrade a Policy requirement
>> +to a Policy recommendation for a given release of the Debian distribution.
>> +This may be done for only a specific package or fo
In data domenica 17 novembre 2019 13:59:59 CET, Sandro Knauß ha scritto:
> thanks for your last update of calligra! That at least makes it build again
> *yeah* But for me it seems like, the whole Akonadi dependency isn't used at
> all.
Sure, it is only checked at cmake time, and apparently not a
Hi Sandro,
On 17-11-2019 14:09, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> calligra is identified as fake candidate (for the moment) every reverse
> dependency is built correctly and it is nothing to do left expect for wait
> till kdepim will go to testing.
>
> Just for the record, for thise who are not familiar wi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 942589 + pending
Bug #942589 [release.debian.org] transition: assimp
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 942440 + pending
Bug #942440 [release.debian.org] transition: libevent
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Hi Stéphane,
Thanks for the reply.
On 17-11-2019 10:14, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Now, I see the following reasons:
> - hivex is too young
Grr... why upload during a transition
> - lwt is blocked because arch:all packages are not built... but there
> are no longer arch:all packages (I don't
Your message dated Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:50:17 +0100
with message-id <3ef846e0-d886-9a23-7ac1-03b14ba02...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#944310: transition: r-api-bioc-3.10
has caused the Debian Bug report #944310,
regarding transition: r-api-bioc-3.10
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 931695 src:libgit-raw-perl 0.79-6
Bug #931695 [libgit-raw-perl] libgit-raw-perl: libgit2 0.28 transition
Bug reassigned from package 'libgit-raw-perl' to 'src:libgit-raw-perl'.
No longer marked as found in versions libgit-raw-perl/0.79-6.
Hello Gordon,
Both pgcli and mycli are managed by me and they both wiating for the
prompt_toolkit update to major version 2. The updated packages are
already in the vcs but cannot be uploaded yet to unstable. I might push
them to experimental in case you want to test something.
Kind regards,
Len
Hey,
calligra is identified as fake candidate (for the moment) every reverse
dependency is built correctly and it is nothing to do left expect for wait
till kdepim will go to testing.
Just for the record, for thise who are not familiar with the other red
crosses:
libkf5sieve, kf5-messagelib, k
Hey pino,
thanks for your last update of calligra! That at least makes it build again
*yeah* But for me it seems like, the whole Akonadi dependency isn't used at
all. So far my digging into calligra code:
Akoandi and CalCore, Contacts is only used for plugins/semanticitems/
{contact,event} but a
Stephen Dowdy writes:
> On 11/16/19 1:35 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> If i could interject here... I haven't followed the entire thread from
> start-to-finish, but
> my main concern here is the fact that somewhere 'lsb_release -rs' got broken.
> This has ALWAYS returned "{major}.{minor}" release st
Le 16/11/2019 à 21:28, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>> Let's see where we are when all ages are fine.
>
> I'm failing to (quickly) see why ocaml doesn't want to migrate. Does
> anybody already have some foo laying around to see what the problem is?
> I'm only seeing ocaml in the autohinter section, while
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 941907 with 944844
Bug #941907 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml
941907 was blocked by: 943920
941907 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 941907: 944844
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
15 matches
Mail list logo
