Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release team,
a regression in the recent libvncserver buster-pu (+deb10u1) has been reported.
+ * Regression update.
+
+ * debian/patches: Add use-after-free/{4,5,6}.patch.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 944227 by 948397
Bug #944227 [release.debian.org] transition: prompt-toolkit
944227 was blocked by: 944542
944227 was blocking: 887101 942660
Added blocking bug(s) of 944227: 948397
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 09:16:42PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> Hi Gordon,
>
> On 06-01-2020 16:39, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Your message dated Mon, 06 Jan 2020 15:37:55 +
> > with message-id
> > and subject line Bug#944227: fixed in prompt-toolkit 2.0.10-2
On 1/8/20 5:31 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 1/7/20 10:21 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I hinted libvigraimpex just now, once it migrates, please go ahead.
>
> Today GDAL 3.0.3RC1 will be released, it's probably a good idea to wait
> for its final release, likely a week later.
On second thoug
On 1/7/20 10:21 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 24-11-2019 08:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Let's see what happens first: this, or the QGIS 3.10.4 release which
>> makes use of GDAL 3 features.
>
> So, did the release of QGIS 3.10.4 or higher already happened?
No, it's scheduled for February 21
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
This is a no-change rebuild of nyancat which will add the missing
systemd unit to nyancat-server (#947292).
Apparently the arch:all binaries were built long ago with a broken
toolch
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
This is a no-change rebuild of nyancat which will add the missing
systemd unit to nyancat-server (#947292).
Apparently the arch:all binaries were built long ago with a broken
toolcha
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I'd like to drop the broken python3 packages from src:owfs. They are
unusable since they contain python2-only code. (#943612)
There are no rdepends.
They were removed from unsta
You could also add /libboost.*-py27/ as a bad dependency to the
python2-rm transition.
Andreas
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
This is not a real transition, just a request for a bunch of binNMUs to
tighten the boost-python dependencies.
Boost currently builds these packages:
libboost-python1.67.0
libboost-m
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi release-team!
I have a bit complicated idea for a buster-pu: ceph.
Buster shipped with 12.2.11 and last April upstream released 12.2.12 as
bugfix release. As usual with ceph, th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 947979 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/enchant-2.html
Bug #947979 [release.debian.org] transition: enchant-2
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/enchant-2.html'.
> thanks
Stopping pro
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #939989 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
939989: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939989
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Sebastiaan,
On 24-11-2019 08:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Once both networkx packages have migrated to testing we're good to go
>> with the gdal transition.
This happened yesterday.
> Let's see what happens first: this, or the QGIS 3.10.4 release which
> mak
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Kari,
On 01-01-2020 18:55, Kari Pahula wrote:
> I'm about to update gecode from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0 in unstable. SONAME
> changes from 48 to 49.
>
> The only reverse dependency is minizinc which I also maintain.
> Transitively minizinc-ide as well. All of these have ha
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #947885 [release.debian.org] transition: gecode
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
947885: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947885
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 948199
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libqt5quick5-gles.html
Bug #948199 [release.debian.org] non-transition: libqt5quick5-gles
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libqt5quick5-gl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 947930 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gspell.html
Bug #947930 [release.debian.org] transition: gspell
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gspell.html'.
> thanks
Stopping pr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 942428 + pending
Bug #942428 [release.debian.org] transition: gssdp/gupnp
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
942428: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942428
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #944227 {Done: Gordon Ball } [release.debian.org]
transition: prompt-toolkit
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as
Control: reopen -1
Hi Gordon,
On 06-01-2020 16:39, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Your message dated Mon, 06 Jan 2020 15:37:55 +
> with message-id
> and subject line Bug#944227: fixed in prompt-toolkit 2.0.10-2
> has caused the Debian Bug report #944227,
> regarding transition: prompt-t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
While 3.2.7a-5+deb10u2 is currently in proposed-updates I prepared
another update (deb10u3) fixing CVE-2019-19746 and CVE-2019-19797 as
well as 6 further segfaults, which are only in
Processing control commands:
> block 947979 by -1
Bug #947979 [release.debian.org] transition: enchant-2
947979 was blocked by: 948351 948106
947979 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 947979: 948352
--
947979: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947979
948352: http
Processing control commands:
> block 947979 by -1
Bug #947979 [release.debian.org] transition: enchant-2
947979 was blocked by: 948106
947979 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 947979: 948351
--
947979: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947979
948351: https://bug
On Mon, 06, Jan, 2020 at 09:42:29PM +, Adam D. Barratt spoke thus..
> Hi,
>
> - January 25th
> - February 1st
> - February 8th
> - February 15th
Hi,
I can do any of the above. Happy to do both on one day if it's easier
for others.
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark Hymers
signature.asc
Description
On 1/7/20 2:01 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: buster
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Dear release team,
>
> As per the issue described here:
> https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/3251
>
> extended next hop
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release team,
As per the issue described here:
https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/3251
extended next hop capability does not work in Debian Buster.
As a consequence, we a
I can do any of these. Probably best avoid FOSDEM though.
/Andy
On 6 January 2020 21:42:29 GMT, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>It's (really past) time to consider a date for the next point releases
>for buster and stretch.
>
>I've listed some suggested dates below; please indicate which you
28 matches
Mail list logo
