Hi Salvatore,
> It's now unfortunately to late for 10.4 but did you saw the ack from
> Adam? If so this can be included then in 10.5.
>
I'm OK for the 10.5. Should I do anything?
Thanks,
François
Hi,
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 07:11:09PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> libreoffice
Note libreoffice only Suggests it (and it dlopen()s libsane.so.1).
A rebuild will change the Suggests since
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/a11f5b7381097ea0ae9a3e03db90
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 04:06:21PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 07-05-2020 15:06, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> > Given the above, this is probably not useful: can it be turned off?
> but given the frequency of binary package
> take over, I'm am not going to spend my time on enhancing or fixing the
Hi François,
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 05:11:30PM +0200, François Mazen wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> > It's now unfortunately to late for 10.4 but did you saw the ack from
> > Adam? If so this can be included then in 10.5.
> >
>
> I'm OK for the 10.5. Should I do anything?
The problem is just, the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
with the new upstream release I change the
libname to the SONAME.
Compiling the dependent programs against the
new library was wi
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #945481 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[bundler] Bump minimum version of ruby-molinillo dependency in ruby-bundler
Added tag(s) pending.
> block -1 with 960020
Bug #945481 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[bundler] Bump minimum version of ruby-molinillo
Hi François
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:28:56PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sun, 2020-03-15 at 20:57 +0100, François Mazen wrote:
> > Please find attached the debdiff.
> >
>
> Please go ahead.
It's now unfortunately to late for 10.4 but did you saw the ac
Hi Xavier,
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 07:24:14PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 06:22 +0100, Xavier Guimard wrote:
> > 2 new vulnerabilities have been published for dojo: prototype
> > pollutions. I imported the 2 upstream fixes here.
> >
>
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
ruby-bundler has an insuffiently versioned dependency on ruby-molinillo
which can cause problems problems after partial upgrades from stretch
(#945481).
ruby-molinillo | 0.5.0-2
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:34:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 10:51 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > ❦ 8 février 2020 08:43 +01, Salvatore Bonaccorso > >:
> >
> > > This needs to be rebased to the 1.8.19-1+deb10u1 which was relea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 960010 960013
Bug #960010 [src:freefem++] freefem++: FBTFS (error: multiple definition of
‘enum CBLAS_SIDE’)
Bug #960010 [src:freefem++] freefem++: FBTFS (error: multiple definition of
‘enum CBLAS_SIDE’)
Added tag(s) bullseye, ftbfs,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 960011 960014
Bug #960011 [src:libmath-gsl-perl] libmath-gsl-perl: FBTFS (unsupported
version: 2.6 at Build.PL line 80)
Bug #960011 [src:libmath-gsl-perl] libmath-gsl-perl: FBTFS (unsupported
version: 2.6 at Build.PL line 80)
Added ta
Processing control commands:
> block 959133 by -1
Bug #959133 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Transition for gsl
959133 was blocked by: 960010
959133 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 959133: 960011
--
959133: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959133
96
Processing control commands:
> block 959133 by -1
Bug #959133 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Transition for gsl
959133 was not blocked by any bugs.
959133 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 959133: 960010
--
959133: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959
14 matches
Mail list logo
