Bug#964069: transition: adplug

2020-06-30 Thread Yangfl
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition adplug uses a versioned soname. Packages which should only require binNMU: adplay mpd ocp https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-adplug.html

Bug#960974: buster-pu: package postfix/3.4.14-0+deb10u1

2020-06-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, June 30, 2020 12:26:01 PM EDT Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 21:42 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > In the 6 weeks since this request was originally filed, there have > > been two more postfix bugfix releases. I'd like to upload 3.4.1

Processed: retitle 947351 to buster-pu: package cloud-init/20.2-2+deb10u1

2020-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 947351 buster-pu: package cloud-init/20.2-2+deb10u1 Bug #947351 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package cloud-init/18.3-6 Changed Bug title to 'buster-pu: package cloud-init/20.2-2+deb10u1' from 'buster-pu: package cloud-init/18.3-6'. > t

Bug#956195: buster-pu: package cloud-init/18.3-6+deb10u1

2020-06-30 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:13:34PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > As discussed in #947351, this is a more targeted fix prepared for > > buster-pu. The updated debdiff is attached. > > The metadata for #936030 implies that this issue affects the package in > unstable. Is that correct? If not, pl

RFC: Clean-up of old kernel ABIs at point releases

2020-06-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[MFT and Reply-To set to debian-release, to try and avoid spamming too many people with the discussion] Hi, When the kernel ABI version has been increased between two point releases, we currently remove the old versions as part of the point release, to avoid carrying cruft. This has unfortunate

Processed: Re: Bug#962237: buster-pu: package perl/5.28.1-6+deb10u1

2020-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #962237 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package perl/5.28.1-6+deb10u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 962237: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962237 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#962237: buster-pu: package perl/5.28.1-6+deb10u1

2020-06-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 22:34 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > As per #962234 for stretch and my remarks on #961443 I'd like to > uploaded a targeted fix for these no-dsa security issues: > > https://metacpan.org/pod/release/XSAWYERX/perl-5.28.3/pod/perldelta.pod >

Bug#960974: buster-pu: package postfix/3.4.14-0+deb10u1

2020-06-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 21:42 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > In the 6 weeks since this request was originally filed, there have > been two more postfix bugfix releases. I'd like to upload 3.4.14 > instead. I'm attaching two debdiffs: > > stable.debdiff is the diff f

Processed: Re: Bug#960974: buster-pu: package postfix/3.4.14-0+deb10u1

2020-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #960974 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package postfix/3.4.12-0+deb10u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 960974: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960974 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#963340: buster-pu: package iptables-persistent/1.0.14

2020-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #963340 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package iptables-persistent/1.0.14 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 963340: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963340 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#963340: buster-pu: package iptables-persistent/1.0.14

2020-06-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 22:19 +0200, gustavo panizzo wrote: > I'd like to fix the bugs #961589 and #963012 in Buster uploading That sounds like it would probably be OK, however: > iptables-persistent 1.0.14 which is already in testing and backports. I'm not sold on thi