Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgc.html
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 2020-07-15 12:14:06 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Packages
On 2020-07-21 19:31:49 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Two packages are built using gccgo, the binNMUs should be done with an extra
> b-d
> on gccgo (>= 4:10.1).
>
> uswgi
>
On 2020-07-21 19:34:55 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 7/21/20 7:16 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > These packages need rebuilding for gdc-10. Maybe it's safe to add
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgc.html
Bug #965057 [release.debian.org] transition: libgc
Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#965057 to the same
value
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #965057 [release.debian.org]
On 2020-07-21 19:32:51 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Two packages are built using the address sanitzer, the binNMUs should be done
> with an extra b-d on gcc (>= 4:10.1).
>
>
Ouch - I just completely missed your previous response on this until
I was reminded by your rescheduling email today. Uploaded now, hope
it's in time.
Best
Dominic
Hi,
On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 15:37 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 14:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > The next point release for "buster" (10.5) is scheduled for
> > Saturday July 18th. Processing of new uploads into buster-proposed-
> > updates will be frozen during the
On 7/21/20 7:16 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> These packages need rebuilding for gdc-10. Maybe it's safe to add an extra
> b-d
> on gdc (>= 1:10.1) for the binNMUs.
that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Two packages are built using the address sanitzer, the binNMUs should be done
with an extra b-d on gcc (>= 4:10.1).
wlcs
goxel
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Two packages are built using gccgo, the binNMUs should be done with an extra b-d
on gccgo (>= 4:10.1).
uswgi
gitbrute
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
These packages need rebuilding for gdc-10. Maybe it's safe to add an extra b-d
on gdc (>= 1:10.1) for the binNMUs.
a7xpg
cheesecutter
dub
dustmite
gunroar
ii-esu
mu-cade
parsec47
On Wed, 27 May 2020 11:56:07 +0200 "Santiago R.R."
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: buster
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Dear Release Managers,
>
> Since 1.0.6-9, bzip2 was built without the -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> CPPFLAG,
12 matches
Mail list logo