Re: introducing an epoch for src:debian-security-support

2020-08-18 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Holger! Holger Levsen writes: > hi, > > debian-security-support | 2019.12.12~deb8u2 | jessie-security | > source, all > debian-security-support | 2020.06.21~deb9u1 | stretch | > source, all > debian-security-support | 2020.06.21~deb10u1 | buster

Bug#968502: buster-pu: arch-test needs to be updated in stable to include s390x fix

2020-08-18 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 07:31:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2020-08-16 at 15:43 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > +arch-test (0.15-2+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium > + > + * Fix s390x detection sometimes failing (Alexander Efremkin). > > Please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded. Meow!

Bug#968378: transition: libraw

2020-08-18 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi Emilio! On 2020-08-18 at 12:00 (+02), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Please go ahead, and file bugs for those FTBFS. Uploaded the package in the afternoon CEST and filed both bug reports (marked with 'serious' severity, but feel free to decrease in case) against freeimage and theli (even on

Processed: block 968378 with 968637

2020-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 968378 with 968637 Bug #968378 [release.debian.org] transition: libraw 968378 was not blocked by any bugs. 968378 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 968378: 968637 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: block 968378 with 968638

2020-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 968378 with 968638 Bug #968378 [release.debian.org] transition: libraw 968378 was blocked by: 968637 968378 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 968378: 968638 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#947351: cloud-init 20.2-2~deb10u1 flagged for acceptance

2020-08-18 Thread Noah Meyerhans
Also, at least for the cloud-team's image generation, we should probably switch to using "source /etc/network/interfaces.d/*", similar to what d-i does and ifupdown will do. It won't help in this case, because the provider that encountered the problem is using some other tooling to generate their

Bug#947351: cloud-init 20.2-2~deb10u1 flagged for acceptance

2020-08-18 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 08:46:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/commit/a6faf3acef02bd8cd4d46ac9efeebf24b3f21d81 > > I must admit that I'm slightly confused by that commit. > > The rationale is that the default file written by ifupdown uses >

Bug#947351: cloud-init 20.2-2~deb10u1 flagged for acceptance

2020-08-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 20:46 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 12:31 -0700, Stefano Rivera wrote: > > Before 19.2 cloud-init wrote /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud- > > init.cfg > > After 19.2 cloud-init wrote /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init > > Relevant upstream

Bug#947351: cloud-init 20.2-2~deb10u1 flagged for acceptance

2020-08-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 12:31 -0700, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Adam (2020.07.09_13:19:23_-0700) > > The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for > > acceptance into the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster. > > FWIW, this update included a change that broke the Debian images

Bug#965057: marked as done (transition: libgc)

2020-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2020 21:44:48 +0200 with message-id <20200818194448.ga798...@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#965057: transition: libgc has caused the Debian Bug report #965057, regarding transition: libgc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#947351: cloud-init 20.2-2~deb10u1 flagged for acceptance

2020-08-18 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Adam (2020.07.09_13:19:23_-0700) > The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into > the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster. FWIW, this update included a change that broke the Debian images for at least one hosting provider. We noticed when provisioning a

Bug#968378: transition: libraw

2020-08-18 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 14/08/2020 00:12, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear Release Team, > > I'm filing this bug for a new transition of libraw package. > > On July 23,

Bug#966018: transition: poppler

2020-08-18 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 22/07/2020 11:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi, > > It's time we get poppler updated. The new version fixes a few security > issues, and I

Processed: Re: Bug#966018: transition: poppler

2020-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #966018 [release.debian.org] transition: poppler Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 966018: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966018 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#968378: transition: libraw

2020-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #968378 [release.debian.org] transition: libraw Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 968378: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968378 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#968548: buster-pu: package s390-tools/2.3.0-2~deb10u1

2020-08-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Adam D. Barratt (2020-08-17): > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > > On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 10:16 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > debootstrap fails to install Debian buster on s390x because of a > > multi-arch "perl:any" dependency it fails to parse (bug #960265). > > This update to s390-tools