Re: A resource to add to your blog :)

Hey there! Just checking in, hope you got my email - waiting to hear back! Thank you :) On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 9:03 AM, Noam Alon wrote: Hi there,  I just finished reading your blog  https://networkinferno.net/synergy-within-our-discipline and really enjoyed it! I thin

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: connman_1.36-2.1~deb10u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: connman_1.36-2.1~deb10u1_all.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: connman_1.36-2.1~deb10u1_amd64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: connman_1.36-2.1~deb10u1_arm64-buildd.changes A

Re: util-linux/2.36.1-7 blocked on flaky systemd/247.3-1 test on ppc64el

Hi Chris, On 09-02-2021 20:19, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > currently, util-linux/2.36.1-7 is blocked from migration because of > a failed test of systemd/247.3-1 on ppc64el. It's not. > I'm told > "networkd-test.py" is known to be flaky. Could very well be, didn't check. > As I can't seem to m

Re: Virtual Debian BSP Salzburg

On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 19:31 +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote: > Hello! > > Is it okay to only attend some of the BSP Event?, Noticed now in my > calendar that i was double booked on that weekend Of course. Every single minute spent on fixing bugs is welcome :) -- Bernd Zeimetz

util-linux/2.36.1-7 blocked on flaky systemd/247.3-1 test on ppc64el

Dear Release Team, currently, util-linux/2.36.1-7 is blocked from migration because of a failed test of systemd/247.3-1 on ppc64el. I'm told "networkd-test.py" is known to be flaky. As I can't seem to make that happen reproducibly for ci.debian.net, could you please mark the test as known bad on

Bug#982401: britney doesn't properly reschedule migration-reference/0 runs anymore

Package: release.debian.org X-Debbugs-CC: hert...@debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Hi myself, I believe that since the patch to remember results for a particular trigger from older versions of the reverse dependency britney2 doesn't properly refreshes migr

Virtual Debian BSP Salzburg

Hello! Is it okay to only attend some of the BSP Event?, Noticed now in my calendar that i was double booked on that weekend

Bug#982390: marked as done (nmu: pbdagcon_0.3+git20180411.c14c422+dfsg-1)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Feb 2021 20:38:41 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#982390: nmu: pbdagcon_pbdagcon has caused the Debian Bug report #982390, regarding nmu: pbdagcon_0.3+git20180411.c14c422+dfsg-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#982399: unblock: adequate/0.15.4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package adequate QA-maintained adequate fell out of testing due to python2 usage. That was fixed recently, but it is currently blocked from reentering by autopkgtest regressi

Processed: retitle 982390 to nmu: pbdagcon_0.3+git20180411.c14c422+dfsg-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 982390 nmu: pbdagcon_0.3+git20180411.c14c422+dfsg-1 Bug #982390 [release.debian.org] nmu: pbdagcon_pbdagcon Changed Bug title to 'nmu: pbdagcon_0.3+git20180411.c14c422+dfsg-1' from 'nmu: pbdagcon_pbdagcon'. > thanks Stopping processing he

Bug#982390: nmu: pbdagcon_pbdagcon

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu pbdagcon_0.3+git20180411.c14c422+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against libblasr5.3.4"