On 08 avril 2021 20:29, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
[...]
> We prefer not to use tpu for such cases. This issue can be fixed via unstable
> by reverting to 52.0.0 with the +really dance as well. So there is no
> need to upload the fix via tpu.
OK, 54.0.0+really52.0.0-1 uploaded to unstable.
Chri
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package polymake
[ Reason ]
This fixes #986381, which could be classified severity important
[ Impact ]
There is no 3D vis
Hi Andreas,
On 08-04-2021 21:52, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Ahhh, I assumed that basic autopkgtest-pkg-r is consider superficial.
That's an interesting point. Should they (they're not)? Maybe with R
packages autopkgtest-pkg-r may or may not be very extensive? If that's
true, than it's currently basic
Hi Sebastian,
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 05:47:04PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >
> > unblock r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6
>
> This package will need another:
>
> Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by tille, a new source-only
> upload is needed to allow migration
Aaaargh, stupi
Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed
Hi,
Putting kibi in CC for the d-i ACK, just to be sure.
Paul
On 08-04-2021 12:25, Colin Watson wrote:
> Please unblock grub2 2.04-17. The --sbat fix will be needed for d-i
> builds once various bits of work on shim are finished, and the verifiers
> module change
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 d-i confirmed
Bug #986625 [release.debian.org] unblock: grub2/2.04-17
Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed.
--
986625: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986625
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 986572 - moreinfo
Bug #986572 [release.debian.org] unblock: osm2pgsql/1.4.1+ds-2 (pre-approval)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
986572: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Control: trags -1 - moreinfo
On 4/8/21 8:31 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-04-07 16:17:45 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> To fix two important issues affecting the ve
On 2021-04-08 17:45:41 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 05:34:40PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > * Mark #986520 as bullseye-ignore and if a there is a need to fix
> > another issues in a bullsey-pu upload, switch CXX to g++-9 in that
> > upload. From what I understa
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #986572 [release.debian.org] unblock: osm2pgsql/1.4.1+ds-2 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.
--
986572: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986572
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On 2021-04-07 16:17:45 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> To fix two important issues affecting the version in bullseye,
> I would like to upload t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: ric...@ubuntu.com
Please unblock package vala
[ Reason ]
Vala 0.48.x series is a Long-Term support version and receives important bug
fixes and binding fixes.
It is part of G
On 08 avril 2021 19:13, Christian Marillat wrote:
> On 08 avril 2021 17:45, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 05:34:40PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> * Mark #986520 as bullseye-ignore and if a there is a need to fix
>>> another issues in a bullsey-pu upload, switch CXX
On 08 avril 2021 17:45, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 05:34:40PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> * Mark #986520 as bullseye-ignore and if a there is a need to fix
>> another issues in a bullsey-pu upload, switch CXX to g++-9 in that
>> upload. From what I understand, thi
Your message dated Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:48:19 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock node-rollup-pluginutils
has caused the Debian Bug report #986617,
regarding unblock: node-rollup-pluginutils/4.1.0+~2.8.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:47:04 +0200
with message-id <20210408154704.gb28...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#986628: unblock: r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #986628,
regarding unblock: r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:45:15 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock darktable
has caused the Debian Bug report #986631,
regarding unblock: darktable/3.4.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 05:34:40PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> * Mark #986520 as bullseye-ignore and if a there is a need to fix
> another issues in a bullsey-pu upload, switch CXX to g++-9 in that
> upload. From what I understand, this workaround is supposed to also
> work for 52.0.0.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #986602 [release.debian.org] unblock: mkvtoolnix/54.0.0-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
986602: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986602
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2021-04-07 23:12:01, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package mkvtoolnix
>
> This package was stuck in unstable since january 2021 due to g
Hi Markus,
On 08-04-2021 13:29, Markus Demleitner wrote:
> With "show" you're thinking of
> mentioning that in the changelog?
No, I meant in the communication with us, in this thread and in the
potentially upcoming unblock request.
>> Not saying I'd unblock this, but it's not hopeless.
>
> So,
Your message dated Thu, 08 Apr 2021 13:52:23 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock alien
has caused the Debian Bug report #986595,
regarding [pre-approval] unblock: alien/ 8.95.4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On 2021-04-08 15:25, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Drew,
On 08-04-2021 15:01, Drew Parsons wrote:
While petsc and release is close to mind, I'd like to request
preauthorization for petsc/3.14.5+dfsg1-3 to make a minimal update to
fix Bug#985659 (fixing broken symlinks in docs).
You stretched us alrea
Hi Drew,
On 08-04-2021 15:01, Drew Parsons wrote:
> While petsc and release is close to mind, I'd like to request
> preauthorization for petsc/3.14.5+dfsg1-3 to make a minimal update to
> fix Bug#985659 (fixing broken symlinks in docs).
You stretched us already quite a bit with -2. What we were m
On 2021-04-08 14:29, Graham Inggs wrote:
Unblocked.
Thanks Graham.
While petsc and release is close to mind, I'd like to request
preauthorization for petsc/3.14.5+dfsg1-3 to make a minimal update to
fix Bug#985659 (fixing broken symlinks in docs).
Beyond that, what is your mood with respec
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package darktable
[ Reason ]
This fixes a FTBFS.
[ Impact ]
A rebuild with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=1 will fail for th
Your message dated Thu, 8 Apr 2021 14:29:01 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#985228: unblock: petsc/3.14.5+dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #985228,
regarding unblock: petsc/3.14.5+dfsg1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Paul,
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 11:19:45AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> our list. Next time, please file a unblock report to discuss such
> issues, as they stay on our radar (you can add "pre-approval" to the title).
Ok, thanks (I was reluctant because of the large attachment).
> On 18-03-2021 12:4
Your message dated Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:55:36 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#985721: unblock: fossil/1:2.15~rc1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #985721,
regarding unblock: fossil/1:2.15~rc1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: 986...@bugs.debian.org
Please unblock package r-cran-rcdklibs
[ Reason ]
Fixing bug #986467.
[ Impact ]
The package would be unusable due to a missing Dependency.
[ Tests ]
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock grub2 2.04-17. The --sbat fix will be needed for d-i
builds once various bits of work on shim are finished, and the verifiers
module change helps core images fit in the const
Your message dated Thu, 8 Apr 2021 12:00:08 +0200
with message-id <1cf5ecda-9ecb-f41b-f52c-9d36208e7...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#986411: unblock: pristine-lfs/20210404.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #986411,
regarding unblock: pristine-lfs/20210404.0-2
to be marked as done.
This
Hi Markus,
This mail fell through the cracks because the sheer amount of traffic on
our list. Next time, please file a unblock report to discuss such
issues, as they stay on our radar (you can add "pre-approval" to the title).
On 18-03-2021 12:42, Markus Demleitner wrote:
> Fixing these requires
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 wontfix
Bug #986213 [release.debian.org] RM: ansible/2.9.16+dfsg-1.1
Added tag(s) wontfix.
--
986213: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986213
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 wontfix
Hi,
On 08-04-2021 09:54, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 01.04.21 10:49, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> Shipping bullseye without a core system administration tool like ansible
>> is not something that we should do. Our users are the clear losers of this
>> situation (and thus D
On 01.04.21 10:49, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Shipping bullseye without a core system administration tool like ansible
> is not something that we should do. Our users are the clear losers of this
> situation (and thus Debian as a whole).>
> Graham, can you please reconsider your position in #984557?
Dear SRM colleagues,
Your input/confirmation is appreciated on the following issue. tl;dr;
are you OK with updating debian-cloud-images in the stable release?
On 03-04-2021 21:29, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> On 03-04-2021 17:44, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>> It is sufficient for the Depends pac
37 matches
Mail list logo
