Hi,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 06:39:04PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Package maintainer has submitted/uploaded this fix, so closing this bug.
I'm slightly confused though here, I do not see a buster-pu bugreport
for finxing this issue yet in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Hi
[Disclaimer, not part of the release team]
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 02:13:47PM +0200, Yadd wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: buster
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> [ Reason ]
> rode-redis is vulnerable ro ReDoS (CVE-2021-29469
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org
Please unblock package klibc
[ Reason ]
Fix some possible integer overflows in the heap manager and the cpio
command. These are probably not to
Control: tags -1 moreinfo d-i
Hi Ondřej,
On 29-04-2021 12:19, Ondřej Surý wrote:
This is a confusing debdiff.
> [ Reason ]
> Upstream security release update of the bind9 package.
136 files changed, 7112 insertions(+), 10801 deletions(-)
Really? All that for a security release?
> [ Impact ]
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo d-i
Bug #987776 [release.debian.org] unblock: bind9/1:9.16.15-1
Added tag(s) d-i and moreinfo.
--
987776: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987776
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo d-i
Bug #987766 [release.debian.org] unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo and d-i.
> retitle -1 unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-3
Bug #987766 [release.debian.org] unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-2
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-3' f
Control: tags -1 moreinfo d-i
Control: retitle -1 unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-3
Hi Ritesh,
On 29-04-2021 10:23, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> The open-iscsi-udeb package is not installable in the d-i environment
> because of the unavailable respective udeb package for libopeniscsiusr.
Ouch. If I unde
Your message dated Thu, 29 Apr 2021 22:11:57 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#987649: unblock: libxcrypt/1:4.4.18-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #987649,
regarding unblock: libxcrypt/1:4.4.18-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package liferea
[ Reason ]
It used to be enough to declare the liferea custom scheme as local to
access resources with a file scheme, but for WebKit2Gtk >= 2.32 it looks
like
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo d-i
Bug #987561 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: fuse3/3.10.3-1
Added tag(s) confirmed, moreinfo, and d-i.
--
987561: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987561
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debia
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo d-i
Hi László,
On 25-04-2021 18:34, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> While it's a new upstream release, it only contains a bugfix [1] and
> correcting spelling mistakes.
> The actual change is in lib/fuse.c and very small [2]. Other changes
> are for the examp
Your message dated Thu, 29 Apr 2021 21:24:13 +0200
with message-id <7cb4d4a2-d4b5-4049-9364-0bd1307e8...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#986758: unblock: systemd/247.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #986758,
regarding unblock: systemd/247.3-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:44:21 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock opendnssec
has caused the Debian Bug report #987774,
regarding unblock: opendnssec/2.1.7-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:41:03 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#987662: unblock: shibboleth-sp/3.2.2+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #987662,
regarding unblock: shibboleth-sp/3.2.2+dfsg1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:38:58 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock adjtimex
has caused the Debian Bug report #987762,
regarding unblock: adjtimex/1.29-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:39:40 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock falkon
has caused the Debian Bug report #987558,
regarding unblock: falkon/3.1.0+dfsg1-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:33:51 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#987564: NMU: CVE-2020-25708 - Fix possible
divide-by-zero.
has caused the Debian Bug report #987564,
regarding NMU: CVE-2020-25708 - Fix possible divide-by-zero.
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Please unblock package node-browserslist
[ Reason ]
node-browserslist is vulnerable to a Regex Denial of Service (ReDoS)
(CVE-2021
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package opendnssec.
[ Reason ]
This version only adds contributed translation files, nothing else.
[ Impact ]
Low impact: without this version users having configured a Span
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 02:21:07PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Please unblock package debian-edu-install 2.11.12 which fixes a bug by
> increasing partitioning sizes preventing installation in certain situations.
I forgot to mention the package contains an udeb, which is not used by
the default
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-edu-install 2.11.12 which fixes a bug by
increasing partitioning sizes preventing installation in certain situations.
+debian-edu-install (2.11.12) unstable; u
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:39 PM Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package adjtimex
I checked autoremovals [1], seems the package will be removed before
it get the chance to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Please unblock package bind9
[ Reason ]
Upstream security release update of the bind9 package.
[ Impact ]
3 grave security issues would aff
Le 29/04/2021 à 10:50, Yadd a écrit :
> Le 29/04/2021 à 10:32, Yadd a écrit :
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>> X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>>
>> Please unblock package node-postc
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #987015 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: python-apt/2.2.0
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
987015: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987015
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Julian,
On 29-04-2021 10:42, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> I had to add another bugfix to the release.
Ack.
> I added the full debdiff against 2.1.7 again, as well as the added
> changes against the pre-approved version.
Appreciated.
Please go ahead and remove the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 987767 unblock: node-postcss/8.2.1+~cs5.3.23-8
Bug #987767 [release.debian.org] unblock: node-postcss/8.2.1+~cs5.3.23-7
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: node-postcss/8.2.1+~cs5.3.23-8' from 'unblock:
node-postcss/8.2.1+~cs5.3.23-7'.
> thank
Le 29/04/2021 à 10:32, Yadd a écrit :
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> Please unblock package node-postcss
>
> [ Reason ]
> node-postcss is vulnerabl
On 2021-04-28 13:20:54 +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package fdroidserver
>
> F-Droid is built on Debian and is a community with the same goals as
> Debian
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #987015 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: python-apt/2.2.0
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
987015: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987015
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
ControL: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:32:07AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> On 15-04-2021 18:28, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > Want to bump version number to stable series versioning, mostly,
> > update the mirror list, and remove inva
Your message dated Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:43:17 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock rhash
has caused the Debian Bug report #987746,
regarding unblock: rhash/1.4.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Please unblock package node-postcss
[ Reason ]
node-postcss is vulnerable to a Regex Denial of Service (ReDoS)
[ Impact ]
Medium
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package open-iscsi
[ Reason ]
With version 2.1.x of open-iscsi, a new library was introduced;
libopeniscsiusr. Since we ship a udeb variant of the open-iscsi package,
this li
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 -moreinfo
Bug #987730 [release.debian.org] unblock: multipath-tools/0.8.5-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
987730: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987730
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 21:49 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 22:50 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > > [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
> > >
> >
> > The revised debdiff patch is attached in this follow-up message.
> > The
36 matches
Mail list logo
