Re: Bug#987013: Release goal proposal: Remove Berkeley DB

2021-05-05 Thread Matthias Klose
On 5/5/21 8:51 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 08:29:52PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 05:04:03PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > >>> And then all the packages currently depending on libdb5.3 will need to >>> implement, or at least document, a transition

Bug#988083: unblock: micro-evtd/3.4-6

2021-05-05 Thread Ryan Tandy
I'm sorry, I belatedly noticed another issue with micro-evtd. #988119: the daemon creates its pid and status files with mode 666, start-stop-daemon doesn't like that and refuses to stop the daemon. I don't know what the appropriate severity is for that one. If it's RC I can make another

Greetings from Mimi

2021-05-05 Thread sal...@zhuomao.com.cn
Greetings from Mimi my Dear Friend, This is Mimi from Seamark, you should have heard it before as I suppose. Seamark is one of the top 3 manufacturers based in China for BGA rework station as well as X Ray inspection/counting machine, basically for the working and inspecting on PBCA, for

Bug#988118: unblock: md4c/0.4.7-2

2021-05-05 Thread Patrick Franz
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: patfr...@gmail.com Please unblock package md4c [ Reason ] It fixes CVE-2021-30027 affecting bullseye. See Security tracker at [1]. [ Impact ] A malformed Markdown documenta

Finding a tentative bullseye release date follow up and possible confirmation

2021-05-05 Thread jorkanofaln
Hello, As stated in a previous email, there was a tentative release date for Bullseye scheduled on May 22 2021, as stated in this mailing list post: https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2021/04/msg00552.html. It is likely for Debian to be released on May 22 2021, in late May or in June

Bug#988112: unblock: gfsview/20121130+dfsg-7

2021-05-05 Thread Anton Gladky
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear release team, please unblock package gfsview Upload gfsview/20121130+dfsg-7 fixes RC-bug #987935. I have enabled ci-pipelines to

Processed: Re: Bug#987947: unblock: gtk+3.0/3.24.24-4

2021-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #987947 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): gtk+3.0/3.24.24-4 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > retitle -1 unblock: gtk+3.0/3.24.24-4 Bug #987947 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): gtk+3.0/3.24.24-4 Changed Bug title to 'unblock:

Bug#987947: unblock: gtk+3.0/3.24.24-4

2021-05-05 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Control: retitle -1 unblock: gtk+3.0/3.24.24-4 On Tue, 04 May 2021 at 22:19:49 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2021-05-02 14:13:56 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > I'd like to update gtk+3.0 in bullseye to pick up an assortment of fixes > > from upstream. > >

Bug#987013: Release goal proposal: Remove Berkeley DB

2021-05-05 Thread Niko Tyni
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 08:29:52PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 05:04:03PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > And then all the packages currently depending on libdb5.3 will need to > > implement, or at least document, a transition strategy. > > My first goal would be to

Bug#988095: unblock: pev/0.81-3

2021-05-05 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pev > Please unblock package pev version 0.81-3 used by lintian. It include a patch from upstream to fix the RC issue https://bugs.debian.org/987959 >.

Bug#988080: marked as done (unblock: mina2/2.1.4-2)

2021-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 5 May 2021 11:36:59 +0200 with message-id <20210505093659.ga31...@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#988080: unblock: mina2/2.1.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #988080, regarding unblock: mina2/2.1.4-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#988088: unblock: libica/3.2.0-4

2021-05-05 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libica [ Reason ] The package fails to build with GCC 10 due to multiple definitions of variables in the test suite (#987614). [ Impact ] libica is a transitive

Processed: correct typo

2021-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 988072 unblock (pre-approval): hivex/1.3.20-1 Bug #988072 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: unblick (pre-approval): hivex/1.3.20-1 Changed Bug title to 'unblock (pre-approval): hivex/1.3.20-1' from 'release.debian.org: unblick

Processed: fix owner

2021-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 988072 ben...@debian.org Bug #988072 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): hivex/1.3.20-1 Owner recorded as ben...@debian.org. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 988072:

Fixing rust package FTBFS in buster (was: Bug#931003: Removed package(s) from unstable )

2021-05-05 Thread peter green
On 04/05/2021 12:28, Santiago Vila wrote: On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:48:09AM +0100, peter green wrote: This was automatically closed by ftpmaster because the package was removed from unstable, but this still does not fix the FTBFS problem in stable. Unfortunately I don't think a proper fix

Bug#988084: unblock: ruby-rugged/1.1.0+ds-4

2021-05-05 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ruby-rugged Version 1.1.0+ds-3 in testing was trying to access internet during tests https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987650 As indicated in the