Hi Pirate,
On 14-05-2021 12:46, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> (There was comment on the bug before the update, so not sure if the bug
pings are actually working)
I pinged the bug yesterday and I see today that the autoremoval has been
delayed. All seems as intended.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Descript
Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2021 08:10:40 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#988529: unblock: golang-go.opencensus/0.22.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #988529,
regarding unblock: golang-go.opencensus/0.22.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Hi Emmanuel,
On 15-05-2021 00:58, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I've compared DCEVM 11.0.10 [1] and 11.0.11 [2],
Are commits f8bc235 and 10263b1 the head of the OpenJDK archive? Does
OpenJDK in Debian carry any patches you want to have too?
I start to realize that src:openjdk-11 is probably more than
Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2021 07:28:30 +0200
with message-id <9c3854c5-48e0-396f-f36b-7e54df1ae...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#988276: unblock: base-files/11.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #988276,
regarding unblock: base-files/11.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:21:31PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Priority: required
> Maintainer: Santiago Vila
> Standards-Version: 4.1.3
> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9)
> +Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13)
>
> Please revert that [1] or show with diffoscope that it doesn't change
> any
Hi Paul,
On 14/05/2021 21:46, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I missed so far that apparently DCEVM is a patch set to the same OpenJDK
> we already have in the archive. Is it feasible, i.e. does it make sense
> and would it help us review it, if you generate a diff of patches,
> instead of the source diff t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package golang-go.opencensus
[ Reason ]
Bug#988250 was marked RC, reporting that Test_Worker_MultiExport
occasionally fails in debci testing (approx 1 test in 15 fails, the
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #988492 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package ircii/20190117-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
988492: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
OOPS.
On 14-05-2021 22:25, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 14-05-2021 09:15, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote:
>> This is a release to fix CVE-2021-29376, which is also Debian bug #986214.
>> [0]
>> The change has been taken from the upstream version 2
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #988492 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package ircii/20190117-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
988492: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 14-05-2021 09:15, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote:
> This is a release to fix CVE-2021-29376, which is also Debian bug #986214. [0]
> The change has been taken from the upstream version 20210314 which is
> known to work. It is also similar to the commit the scrollz package h
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #988276 [release.debian.org] unblock: base-files/11.1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
988276: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988276
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Santiago,
On 09-05-2021 12:25, Santiago Vila wrote:
> The changes are of two types:
>
> a) Changes for standards compliance and bugs which are trivial to fix
> (at the top of changelog) and
>
> b) The "branding" changes which always happen before a stable release
>
Your message dated Fri, 14 May 2021 22:03:55 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#988372: unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.55
has caused the Debian Bug report #988372,
regarding unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.55
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Hi Ritesh,
On 12-05-2021 18:27, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> The package has been uploaded to Unstable. It has built proper on all
> supported architectures. You may want to consider unblocking this build
> revision.
The armhf udeb package has an unmet dependency.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Descrip
Hi Emmanuel,
On 01-05-2021 14:43, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I agree the diff is not reviewable, but it can be seen as an update of
> the DCEVM code to the same state as the OpenJDK code that was already
> accepted in testing. The extra DCEVM patches were simply rebased with no
> changes on top of Op
Your message dated Fri, 14 May 2021 21:36:16 +0200
with message-id <970ed7c2-5eb7-fea2-7c87-dd5eccf27...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#987888: unblock: ibus-anthy/1.5.12-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #987888,
regarding unblock: ibus-anthy/1.5.12-2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #987836 [release.debian.org] unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.11+9-1 and
openjdk-17/17~19-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
987836: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987836
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Matthias,
On 30-04-2021 16:57, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please unblock the openjdk-11 and openjdk-17 packages.
Can you please attach a debdiff to the bug for each package like we
always ask for unblocks. In this case it's even more relevant because
our tools fail to c
Your message dated Fri, 14 May 2021 20:57:55 +0200
with message-id <268be911-c569-9348-935b-9c68356da...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#985958: unblock: spip/3.2.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #985958,
regarding unblock: spip/3.2.11-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Fri, 14 May 2021 20:54:04 +0200
with message-id <887b66be-3287-44d2-c3a4-95191cb82...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#987022: unblock: spamassassin/3.4.5~pre1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #987022,
regarding unblock: spamassassin/3.4.5~pre1-4
to be marked as done.
This
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: haavard_aa...@yahoo.no
Added patch to fix CVE-2019-18849, bug #944851. The patch is identical
to that applied in jessie, but I also controlled it against the upstream
c
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: gnutl...@packages.debian.org
Hello,
I would like to fix three minor security issues (non-DSA) in stable.
* 46_handshake-reject-no_renegotiation-alert-if-handshake.patc
Attaching the debdiff as well.
diff -Nru ircii-20190117/debian/changelog ircii-20190117/debian/changelog
--- ircii-20190117/debian/changelog 2019-02-21 05:35:56.0 +0100
+++ ircii-20190117/debian/changelog 2021-05-14 01:51:43.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+ircii (20190117-1+deb10u
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: haavard_aa...@yahoo.no
This is a release to fix CVE-2021-29376, which is also Debian bug #986214. [0]
The change has been taken from the upstream version 20210314 which
Am 14.05.21 um 12:46 schrieb Pirate Praveen:
Tracker says it will be auto removed by May 25 and 15 more days are needed for
migration. Does it mean, this missed bullseye?
0.7.14.0+debian2+nmu2 would have been in time.
Cheers, Jan.
On 2021, മേയ് 8 1:00:01 AM IST, Paul Gevers wrote:
>Hi Pirate, Jan,
>
>On 07-05-2021 11:37, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> Please unblock package diaspora-installer
>
>diaspora-installer is not blocked, nothing to do.
Tracker says it will be auto removed by May 25 and 15 more days are needed for
mi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-javascript-de...@lists.debian.org
Please unblock package node-millstone
[ Reason ]
During autopkgtest, node-millstone downloads files from upstream
repository. One of this
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package btrfs-progs
The version in Bullseye suffers from a regression that breaks adding new
devmapped devices to btrfs filesystems. The bug has been fixed in 5.11
shortly a
Processing changes file: fwupdate_12-4+deb10u4_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: fwupdate_12-4+deb10u4_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: fwupdate_12-4+deb10u4_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: fwupdate_12-4+deb10u4_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Proces
Processing changes file: fwupdate_12-4+deb10u4_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: hivex_1.3.18-1+deb10u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: hivex_1.3.18-1+deb10u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: hivex_1.3.18-1+deb10u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Process
31 matches
Mail list logo
