Bug#989498: unblock: golang-1.15/1.15.9-5

2021-06-05 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 11:46 AM Paul Gevers wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Shengjing, > > On 05-06-2021 13:57, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > Please unblock package golang-1.15 > > You're well aware that golang builds statically so normally we're not > done with just accepting one package.

Bug#989198: unblock: webkit2gtk/2.32.1-1

2021-06-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Alberto, On 05-06-2021 01:52, Alberto Garcia wrote: > So if you are ok with the change of dependencies I will upload it to > unstable and request a new unblock. Ack. But next time, please create a new unblock (pre-approval) request. This bug is closed and your message had a high chance of bein

Bug#989131: marked as done (unblock: gosa/2.7.4+reloaded3-16)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 6 Jun 2021 06:58:13 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#989131: unblock: gosa/2.7.4+reloaded3-16 has caused the Debian Bug report #989131, regarding unblock: gosa/2.7.4+reloaded3-16 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#989368: marked as done (unblock: libass/1:0.15.0-2)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 6 Jun 2021 06:38:29 +0200 with message-id <2041f9d8-a203-4ffc-4480-43903ee51...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#989368: unblock: libass/1:0.15.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #989368, regarding unblock: libass/1:0.15.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#988442: marked as done (unblock: linux/5.10.40-1)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 6 Jun 2021 06:35:51 +0200 with message-id <66a78b81-f4aa-0478-93f1-7dde9c138...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#988442: unblock: linux/5.10.40-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #988442, regarding unblock: linux/5.10.40-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#989416: marked as done (unblock: homebank/5.5.2-1)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 6 Jun 2021 06:32:37 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#989416: unblock: homebank/5.5.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #989416, regarding unblock: homebank/5.5.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Processed: Re: Bug#988830: [pre-approval] unblock e2fsprogs [Was: Bug#987641: e2fsprogs: FTBFS on armel/armhf with a 64-bit kernel]

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #988830 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: e2fsprogs Added tag(s) moreinfo. > retitle -1 unblock: e2fsprogs/1.46.2-1 Bug #988830 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: e2fsprogs Changed Bug title to 'unblock: e2fsprogs/1.46.2-1' f

Bug#988830: [pre-approval] unblock e2fsprogs [Was: Bug#987641: e2fsprogs: FTBFS on armel/armhf with a 64-bit kernel]

2021-06-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Control: retitle -1 unblock: e2fsprogs/1.46.2-1 On 03-06-2021 22:06, Paul Gevers wrote: > As I can't judge this myself, I'll take your word for it. If the upload > can happen in the next couple of days, let's have this in unstable and > if nothing is reported, have it in

Bug#989037: Bug#988214: fixed in rails 2:6.0.3.7+dfsg-1

2021-06-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Utkarsh, On 04-06-2021 11:26, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 1:38 AM Paul Gevers wrote: >>> You haven't answered my question: "does rails still work with the old >>> version of ruby-marcel and can the version bump be reverted" >> >> Ping. Without a proper answer, I can't decide.

Bug#989036: unblock: ruby-marcel/1.0.1+dfsg-2

2021-06-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Utkarsh, [While typing a reply to the rails unblock, I checked this request again]. On 24-05-2021 10:17, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > We had to bump ruby-marcel to a newer version because the mimemagic > dependency - which relies on GPL-licensed mime type data from > freed

Processed: Re: Bug#989036: unblock: ruby-marcel/1.0.1+dfsg-2

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #989036 [release.debian.org] unblock: ruby-marcel/1.0.1+dfsg-2 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 989036: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989036 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#989498: unblock: golang-1.15/1.15.9-5

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #989498 [release.debian.org] unblock: golang-1.15/1.15.9-5 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 989498: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989498 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#989498: unblock: golang-1.15/1.15.9-5

2021-06-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Shengjing, On 05-06-2021 13:57, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > Please unblock package golang-1.15 You're well aware that golang builds statically so normally we're not done with just accepting one package. Do we now need to also rebuild everything that build depends on golan

Bug#988442: unblock: linux/5.10.40-1

2021-06-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi kibi, Salvatore, On 03-06-2021 22:31, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Will keep an eye on this, and close this bug report once > migration has happend (just in case some bit is missing/some typo > happened or something). This happened, so this bug can be closed now. Paul OpenPGP_signature Descrip

Bug#989507: marked as done (unblock: collectd/5.12.0-6)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jun 2021 23:26:58 + with message-id and subject line unblock collectd has caused the Debian Bug report #989507, regarding unblock: collectd/5.12.0-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#988692: marked as done (unblock: saga/7.3.0+dfsg-5 (pre-approval))

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jun 2021 23:23:03 + with message-id and subject line unblock saga has caused the Debian Bug report #988692, regarding unblock: saga/7.3.0+dfsg-5 (pre-approval) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#989482: marked as done (unblock: htmlmin/0.1.12-3)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jun 2021 23:11:31 + with message-id and subject line unblock htmlmin has caused the Debian Bug report #989482, regarding unblock: htmlmin/0.1.12-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#989506: marked as done (unblock: lutris/0.5.8.3-2)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jun 2021 23:04:08 + with message-id and subject line unblock lutris has caused the Debian Bug report #989506, regarding unblock: lutris/0.5.8.3-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#989484: marked as done (unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.24)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jun 2021 22:58:52 + with message-id and subject line unblock debian-edu-doc has caused the Debian Bug report #989484, regarding unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.24 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#989480: marked as done (unblock: chiaki/2.1.0-1.1)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jun 2021 22:57:33 + with message-id and subject line unblock chiaki has caused the Debian Bug report #989480, regarding unblock: chiaki/2.1.0-1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#989469: marked as done (unblock: qtbase-opensource-src/5.15.2+dfsg-7)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jun 2021 22:55:58 + with message-id and subject line unblock qtbase-opensource-src has caused the Debian Bug report #989469, regarding unblock: qtbase-opensource-src/5.15.2+dfsg-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#989449: marked as done (unblock: exabgp/4.2.8-2)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jun 2021 22:54:08 + with message-id and subject line unblock exabgp has caused the Debian Bug report #989449, regarding unblock: exabgp/4.2.8-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#989446: marked as done (unblock: apt-transport-s3/2.0.0-2)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jun 2021 22:52:13 + with message-id and subject line unblock apt-transport-s3 has caused the Debian Bug report #989446, regarding unblock: apt-transport-s3/2.0.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#989426: marked as done (unblock: python-django/2:2.2.24-1)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jun 2021 22:50:55 + with message-id and subject line unblock python-django has caused the Debian Bug report #989426, regarding unblock: python-django/2:2.2.24-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#989509: buster-pu: package klibc/2.0.6-1+deb10u1

2021-06-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Ben Hutchings dixit: >Thorsten Glaser tested the s390x fix in unstable. It has not (yet) >been manually tested in this version. Unfortunately we don’t have a baseline, as the only test I had that triggered this doesn’t trigger in buster (probably because only a newer GCC scheduled things to use

Bug#989509: buster-pu: package klibc/2.0.6-1+deb10u1

2021-06-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org, mirabilos [ Reason ] There are open security issues that were triaged as no-dsa by the security team. These affect the heap functions

Bug#989507: unblock: collectd/5.12.0-6

2021-06-05 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package collectd [ Reason ] Fixing #968950 collectd-dev: missing meta_data.h header file included by plugin.h [ Impact ] Building c plugins for collectd is not possible any

Bug#989506: unblock: lutris/0.5.8.3-2

2021-06-05 Thread Stephan Lachnit
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: stephanlach...@debian.org Please unblock package lutris [ Reason ] This fixes an issue appearing with Python 3.9 in a part of the program. Without this fix, the program will c

Bug#988662: [pre-approval] unblock: apt/2.2.4

2021-06-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 10:09:44PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Julian, > > Sorry it took so long to reply; pre-approvals are regularly awkward. > > On Mon, 17 May 2021 17:07:08 +0200 Julian Andres Klode > wrote: > > Please unblock package apt > > Can you elabor

Bug#989502: marked as done (stretch-pu: package ieee-data/20160613.1+deb9u1+nmu1)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jun 2021 17:34:57 +0100 with message-id <2f188a1032cad7ca692dbcedf91a67c2a4b219a5.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#989502: stretch-pu: package ieee-data/20160613.1+deb9u1+nmu1 has caused the Debian Bug report #989502, regarding stretch-pu: package iee

Bug#989504: unblock: orthanc/1.9.2+really1.9.1+dfsg-1

2021-06-05 Thread Étienne Mollier
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: etienne.moll...@mailoo.org, s.jodo...@orthanc-labs.com, debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org Please unblock package orthanc [ Reason ] The version 1.9.2+dfsg-1 has be

Processed: tagging 989421

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 989421 + confirmed d-i Bug #989421 [release.debian.org] unblock: libgcrypt20/1.8.7-6 Added tag(s) confirmed and d-i. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 989421: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Bug#989421: unblock: libgcrypt20/1.8.7-6

2021-06-05 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Sebastian Ramacher (2021-06-05): > On 2021-06-03 13:23:02 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: unblock > > X-Debbugs-Cc: libgcryp...@packages.debian.org > > > > Please unblock package

Bug#989425: unblock: libpam-chroot/0.9-5

2021-06-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo On 2021-06-03 13:53:17 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package libpam-chroot > > [ Reason ] > This version inclu

Processed: Re: Bug#989425: unblock: libpam-chroot/0.9-5

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #989425 [release.debian.org] unblock: libpam-chroot/0.9-5 Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed. -- 989425: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989425 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#989421: unblock: libgcrypt20/1.8.7-6

2021-06-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tgs -1 confirmed d-i On 2021-06-03 13:23:02 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > X-Debbugs-Cc: libgcryp...@packages.debian.org > > Please unblock package libgcrypt20. > > Compa

Bug#989412: marked as done (unblock: ifupdown-extra/0.32)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jun 2021 14:21:29 + with message-id and subject line unblock ifupdown-extra has caused the Debian Bug report #989412, regarding unblock: ifupdown-extra/0.32 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#989376: marked as done (unblock: glusterfs/9.2-1)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jun 2021 14:19:59 + with message-id and subject line unblock glusterfs has caused the Debian Bug report #989376, regarding unblock: glusterfs/9.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#989502: stretch-pu: package ieee-data/20160613.1+deb9u1+nmu1

2021-06-05 Thread Samuel Henrique
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: stretch X-Debbugs-Cc: samuel...@debian.org Severity: normal [ Reason ] I'd like to perform an oldstable NMU upload in order to fix #908623 and #932711: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=9086

Bug#989498: unblock: golang-1.15/1.15.9-5

2021-06-05 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org Please unblock package golang-1.15 [ Reason ] Backport patches for CVE-2021-33195 CVE-2021-33197 CVE-2021-33198 [ Impact ] Security issue. [ Tests ] Unit te

Bug#989494: buster-pu: package http-parser/2.8.1-1

2021-06-05 Thread Christoph Biedl
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbug-CC: ruby-http-parser...@packages.debian.org Hello release team, there is a minor (non-DSA) security issue open in the Debian 10 ("buster") version of http-parser, and I'd l

Bug#989355: transition: tinyxml2

2021-06-05 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 12:27:06PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2021-06-02 02:45:56, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > There's been an ABI break without an upstream s

Processed: Re: Bug#988692: unblock: saga/7.3.0+dfsg-5 (pre-approval)

2021-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #988692 [release.debian.org] unblock: saga/7.3.0+dfsg-5 (pre-approval) Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 988692: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988692 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#988692: unblock: saga/7.3.0+dfsg-5 (pre-approval)

2021-06-05 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On 6/4/21 10:14 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2021-05-18 07:10:02 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: unblock >> >> Please unblock package saga which fixes >> t

Bug#988692: unblock: saga/7.3.0+dfsg-5 (pre-approval)

2021-06-05 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 6/5/21 11:11 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 6/4/21 10:14 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: >> On 2021-05-18 07:10:02 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >>> Package: release.debian.org >>> Severity: normal >>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >>> Usertags: unblock >>> >>> Please unblock