Processing changes file: krb5_1.17-3+deb10u2_sourceonly.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: krb5_1.17-3+deb10u2_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: krb5_1.17-3+deb10u2_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: krb5_1.17-3+deb10u2_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Pro
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2021 22:32:03 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#991746: RM: gitlab-workhorse/8.54.2+debian-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #991746,
regarding RM: gitlab-workhorse/8.54.2+debian-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2021 22:22:32 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#991512: unblock: flatpak/1.10.2-3 (pre-approval)
has caused the Debian Bug report #991512,
regarding unblock: flatpak/1.10.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Hi again,
I confirm the remaining tests results are consistent with the
yet to be uploaded gdcm/3.0.8-2:
> Build Tests Package (remark)
> -- --
> [ OK ] [ OK ] auto-multiple-choice (autopkgtest needs writable home)
> [ OK ] [NONE] itksnap
> [ OK ] [NONE] kylin-
Processing control commands:
> block 990889 by -1
Bug #990889 [gitlab-workhorse] gitlab-workhorse: contains non-free image
testdata/image.svg
990889 was blocked by: 991745
990889 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 990889: 991746
--
990889: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Control: block 990889 by -1
Affected by rc bug 990889 but not needed in bullseye (it's only reverse
dependency is gitlab)
See #991745 for an explanation why it can't be removed from unstable ye
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello Release Team,
Please unblock package gdcm
This is a pre-approval request, because I am waiting for a
double check of my test results, and there are notorious CPU
cycles hogs in the q
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #991531 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher }
[release.debian.org] unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers/470.57.02-2 et.al.
(pre-approval)
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #991531 to the same values
previously set
--
991531: https://bu
Control: reopen -1
On 2021-07-31 15:45:03 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2021 15:41:27 +
> with message-id
> and subject line unblock nvidia-graphics-drivers
> has caused the Debian Bug report #991531,
> regarding unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers/470
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2021 17:46:03 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#991530: unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers/460.91.03-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #991530,
regarding unblock: nvidia-{graphics-drivers,settings}{,-legacy-*,-tesla-*)}
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2021 15:45:15 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock prometheus-node-exporter
has caused the Debian Bug report #991601,
regarding unblock: prometheus-node-exporter/1.1.2+ds-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2021 15:43:31 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock fetchmail
has caused the Debian Bug report #991731,
regarding unblock: fetchmail/6.4.16-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2021 15:41:27 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock nvidia-graphics-drivers
has caused the Debian Bug report #991531,
regarding unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers/470.57.02-2 et.al. (pre-approval)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2021 15:30:13 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock openntpd
has caused the Debian Bug report #991481,
regarding unblock: openntpd/1:6.2p3-4.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2021 15:27:05 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock python-fakeredis
has caused the Debian Bug report #991724,
regarding unblock: python-fakeredis/1.4.5-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2021 15:28:09 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock gemma
has caused the Debian Bug report #991728,
regarding unblock: gemma/0.98.4+dfsg-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2021 15:26:06 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock neomutt
has caused the Debian Bug report #991716,
regarding unblock: neomutt/20201127+dfsg.1-1.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
On 2021-07-30 14:06:10 +0200, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package python-a38
>
> [ Reason ]
> The attached debdiff provides
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Bug #991701 [release.debian.org] unblock: python-a38/0.1.3-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
991701: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991701
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Le 31/07/2021 à 13:25, Yadd a écrit :
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package node-url-parse
>
> [ Reason ]
> node-url-parse 1.5.1 is vulnerable to URL redirection to untrusted
> sites.
>
> [ I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package node-url-parse
[ Reason ]
node-url-parse 1.5.1 is vulnerable to URL redirection to untrusted
sites.
[ Impact ]
Medium security issue
[ Tests ]
Test passed (both bui
On 16211 March 1977, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
FTP Masters, please sync the installer from sid to testing, as it
seems
to be Installed for all release architectures (9 total):
dak copy-installer 20210731
$ dak copy-installer 20210731
Will copy installer version 20210731 from suite unstable
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: flatpak/1.10.2-3
Bug #991512 [release.debian.org] unblock: flatpak/1.10.2-3 (pre-approval)
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: flatpak/1.10.2-3' from 'unblock:
flatpak/1.10.2-3 (pre-approval)'.
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #991512 [release.debian.org] unb
Control: retitle -1 unblock: flatpak/1.10.2-3
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 19:46:18 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> As we're getting very close to the release, the upload needs to happen
> soon. If it does, let's have this. Please remove the moreinfo tag once
> the upload happene
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package node-esquery
[ Reason ]
FTBFS due to STDERR warning
[ Impact ]
FTBFS
[ Tests ]
Fixed
[ Risks ]
No risk
[ Checklist ]
[X] all changes are documented in the d/cha
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package node-caniuse-api
[ Reason ]
FTBFS due to STDERR warning
[ Impact ]
autopkgtest fails
[ Tests ]
Fixed
[ Risks ]
No risk
[ Checklist ]
[X] all changes are documen
On Sun, 18 Jul 2021 18:35:52 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 15:08 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> >
> > Would it be possible to upload the backported fix for gcc-mingw-w64’s
> > #989862 to Buster? The debdiff is attached; it’s a minimal, targeted
> > fix for gcov support.
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package node-browserslist
[ Reason ]
FTBFS due to STDERR warning
[ Impact ]
Fixes autopkgtest
[ Tests ]
autopkgtest fixed by this patch
[ Risks ]
No risk
[ Checklist ]
Hi,
FTP Masters, please sync the installer from sid to testing, as it seems
to be Installed for all release architectures (9 total):
dak copy-installer 20210731
Release team: FYI, I've unblocked + urgented it; fixing the changelog
from the previous upload made me fail harder this
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2021 08:16:16 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock python-defaults
has caused the Debian Bug report #991709,
regarding unblock: python-defaults/2.7.18-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2021 08:06:01 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock twitter-bootstrap4
has caused the Debian Bug report #991672,
regarding unblock: twitter-bootstrap4/4.5.2+dfsg1-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi RMs,
I would like to ask for unblocking fetchmail, fixing a security issue.
[ Reason ]
When logging long messages, fetchmail might segfault or leak
information to logs.
[ Impact ]
Norm
32 matches
Mail list logo
