Bug#1027283: transition: tiff

2023-01-10 Thread GCS
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:32 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2023-01-08 09:07:37 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote: > > Transition can start anytime upon RM decision. > > Please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded yesterday evening. Almost all builds are already done. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Processed: transition: re2

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:re2 Bug #1028436 [release.debian.org] transition: re2 Added indication that 1028436 affects src:re2 -- 1028436: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028436 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1028248: transition: bullet

2023-01-10 Thread Markus Koschany
Am Dienstag, dem 10.01.2023 um 22:34 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > Please go ahead Thank you! Uploaded. Markus signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#1028436: transition: re2

2023-01-10 Thread Stefano Rivera
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:re2 Sorry for a last minute request. I was just looking through my packages on the weekend and noticed that re2 had

Bug#1027746: marked as done (transition: log4cxx)

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2023 23:23:28 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1027746: transition: log4cxx has caused the Debian Bug report #1027746, regarding transition: log4cxx to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#931659: marked as done (transition: rm python2)

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2023 22:48:19 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#931659: transition: rm python2 has caused the Debian Bug report #931659, regarding transition: rm python2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#1028379: marked as done (nmu: nmu for pluginlib-dev reverse build depends)

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2023 22:49:46 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1028379: nmu: nmu for pluginlib-dev reverse build depends has caused the Debian Bug report #1028379, regarding nmu: nmu for pluginlib-dev reverse build depends to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: Re: Bug#1027942: transition: poppler 22.12

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1027942 [release.debian.org] transition: poppler 22.12 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1027942: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027942 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#1028248: transition: bullet

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1028248 [release.debian.org] transition: bullet Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1028248: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028248 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1028248: transition: bullet

2023-01-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2023-01-10 19:22:39 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Short follow-up: > > The bug in dart (#1028247) has already been fixed. That means only 7 binNMU > would be required to complete this transition now. Please go ahead Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1027942: transition: poppler 22.12

2023-01-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2023-01-04 16:35:41 -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: popp...@packages.debain.org > Control: block -1 by 1026040 > Control: block -1 by 1026093 > > Poppler

Processed: Re: Bug#1028246: transition: liquid-dsp

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1028246 [release.debian.org] transition: liquid-dsp Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1028246: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028246 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1028246: transition: liquid-dsp

2023-01-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2023-01-10 03:50:30 +0100, Andreas Bombe wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 11:47:42PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 10:11:46PM +0100, Andreas Bombe wrote: > > >... > > > i386 only, where some > > > floats don't match exactly, which I'm still

Bug#1027967: transition: tinygltf

2023-01-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2023-01-05 11:57:40 +0100, Timo Röhling wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: tinyg...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:tinygltf > > Dear release team, > > I'd like to

Processed: Re: Bug#1027283: transition: tiff

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1027283 [release.debian.org] transition: tiff Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1027283: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027283 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1027283: transition: tiff

2023-01-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2023-01-08 09:07:37 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 1:04 PM Sebastian Ramacher > wrote: > > On 2022-12-29 18:19:58 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote: > > > As tiff is used commonly and has security issues from time to time it > > > would be

Processed: Re: Bug#931659: transition: rm python2

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > notforwarded -1 Bug #931659 [release.debian.org] transition: rm python2 Unset Bug forwarded-to-address -- 931659: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931659 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#931659: transition: rm python2

2023-01-10 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: notforwarded -1 Can this be closed?

Bug#1028118: marked as done (transition: rocksdb)

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2023 22:12:34 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1028118: transition: rocksdb has caused the Debian Bug report #1028118, regarding transition: rocksdb to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#1004441: unblocking chromium?

2023-01-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: close 1004441 Hi, On 10-01-2023 21:05, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Sounds good! Can you add a README.Debian.security to the next unstable uploads which briefly documents that? When bookworm has been released we can also add a note to Chromium DSAs to give folks a headsup. So, it sounds

Processed: Re: Bug#1004441: unblocking chromium?

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close 1004441 Bug #1004441 [release.debian.org] Chromium: decide before the freeze if it can be part of bookworm Marked Bug as done -- 1004441: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004441 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#1004441: unblocking chromium?

2023-01-10 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Am Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 12:27:52AM -0500 schrieb Andres Salomon: > > On Fri, Jan 6 2023 at 11:36:02 AM +0200, Adrian Bunk > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 10:18:16AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > ... > > > We might consider to set some expectation for oldstable-security, > > >

Re: SONAME bumps (transitions) always via experimental

2023-01-10 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Andreas" == Andreas Metzler writes: Andreas> Afaiui Graham's *question* was in response to Bastian's Andreas> "However, please describe an actionable plan." Obviously it Andreas> would be a lot easier if we could require to have all NEW Andreas> uploads go to experimental

Bug#1028248: transition: bullet

2023-01-10 Thread Markus Koschany
Short follow-up: The bug in dart (#1028247) has already been fixed. That means only 7 binNMU would be required to complete this transition now. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: SONAME bumps (transitions) always via experimental

2023-01-10 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2023-01-10 Sam Hartman wrote: > > "Graham" == Graham Inggs writes: > Graham> Hi All > Graham> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 00:33, Bastian Blank > wrote: > Graham> Would it be a bad thing to require all uploads that need to > Graham> go through NEW (source and binary) to target

Re: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 01:44:40PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs: > Hi Rebecca > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 10:30, Rebecca N. Palmer > wrote: > > Should this go ahead before the freeze? I think yes if the new dask > > works, but am open to disagreement. > > Please go ahead. With numpy 1:1.24.1-2

Bug#1028396: bullseye-pu: package ruby-aws-sdk-core/3.104.3

2023-01-10 Thread Vivek K J
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: ruby-aws-sdk-c...@packages.debian.org, vive...@disroot.org Control: affects -1 + src:ruby-aws-sdk-core [ Reason ] Stable version of ruby-aws-sdk-core doesn't have

Processed: bullseye-pu: package ruby-aws-sdk-core/3.104.3

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:ruby-aws-sdk-core Bug #1028396 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package ruby-aws-sdk-core/3.104.3 Added indication that 1028396 affects src:ruby-aws-sdk-core -- 1028396: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028396 Debian Bug

Processed: bullseye-pu: package exiv2/0.27.3-3+deb11u2

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:exiv2 Bug #1028395 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package exiv2/0.27.3-3+deb11u2 Added indication that 1028395 affects src:exiv2 -- 1028395: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028395 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1028386: bullseye-pu: package avahi/0.8-5+deb11u2

2023-01-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: av...@packages.debian.org, car...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:avahi Hi, as discussed (internally) with Salvatore from the security team, I'd like to make a

Processed: bullseye-pu: package avahi/0.8-5+deb11u2

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:avahi Bug #1028386 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package avahi/0.8-5+deb11u2 Added indication that 1028386 affects src:avahi -- 1028386: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028386 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1024893: marked as done (transition: libcifpp)

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2023 11:29:42 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1024893: libcifpp: Requesting transition slot has caused the Debian Bug report #1024893, regarding transition: libcifpp to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1027463: marked as done (transition: clamav)

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2023 11:22:43 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1027463: transition: clamav has caused the Debian Bug report #1027463, regarding transition: clamav to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#1028286: marked as done (transition: xml-security-c)

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2023 11:25:05 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1028286: transition: xml-security-c has caused the Debian Bug report #1028286, regarding transition: xml-security-c to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: Re: Bug#1027686: transition: rakudo

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #1027686 [release.debian.org] transition: rakudo Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1027686 to the same tags previously set -- 1027686: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027686 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1027686: transition: rakudo

2023-01-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2023-01-09 13:54:08 -0500, M. Zhou wrote: > I missed the detail that the compiler ID even changes for different > architecture.. which may not be good. Is it required that the build path of the compiler influences the ID? Can the computation of the ID be patched to

Bug#1027797: marked as done (transition: aac-tactics 8.17.0-1)

2023-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2023 11:18:03 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1027797: transition: aac-tactics 8.17.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1027797, regarding transition: aac-tactics 8.17.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1028379: nmu: nmu for pluginlib-dev reverse build depends

2023-01-10 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi release team, I've just uploaded a new pluginlib-dev (5.2.1-2) that fixes a bug in the header. This is compiled into it's reverse build dependencies, so please NMU the following