Bug#1028571: bullseye-pu: package akregator/20.08.3-1+deb11u1

2023-01-12 Thread Hefee
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: akrega...@packages.debian.org, Jeff Sacksteder , he...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:akregator Hey, [ Reason ] [#1027689] - Akregator is not able to delete

Processed: bullseye-pu: package akregator/20.08.3-1+deb11u1

2023-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:akregator Bug #1028571 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package akregator/20.08.3-1+deb11u1 Added indication that 1028571 affects src:akregator -- 1028571: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028571 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#1028566: unblock: rust-debcargo/2.6.0-2

2023-01-12 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-debca...@packages.debian.org, pkg-rust-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net Control: affects -1 + src:rust-debcargo Please unblock package rust-debcargo [ Reason ] This

Processed: unblock: rust-debcargo/2.6.0-2

2023-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:rust-debcargo Bug #1028566 [release.debian.org] unblock: rust-debcargo/2.6.0-2 Added indication that 1028566 affects src:rust-debcargo -- 1028566: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028566 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1028452: unblock: golang-1.19/1.19.5-1

2023-01-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Security team, We stumbled upon golang... On 12-01-2023 16:50, Shengjing Zhu wrote: But this bug report triggered me: did the golang security situation already improved during this release cycle. I may be misremembering, but I recall the problems on the security archive side haven't been

Bug#1014460: transition: php8.2

2023-01-12 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Paul, On Do 12 Jan 2023 14:59:50 CET, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Mike and other Horde maintainers, On 22-10-2022 17:31, Mike Gabriel wrote: For Horde, getting autopkgtests resolved (and packages migrate to testing) is one thing, but getting all of Horde deprecation-warnings-free with

Processed: Re: Bug#1028283: transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-8

2023-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1028283 [release.debian.org] transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-8 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1028283: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028283 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1028283: transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-8

2023-01-12 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Dmitry On 2023-01-09 12:26:41 +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-8.html >

Bug#1028452: unblock: golang-1.19/1.19.5-1

2023-01-12 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:28 PM Paul Gevers wrote: > > Hi Shengjing, > > On 11-01-2023 09:32, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > Please unblock package golang-1.19 > > But golang-1.19 is in sync between unstable and testing. > Because I haven't uploaded. This unblock request is for 1.19.5-1, while

Bug#1028452: unblock: golang-1.19/1.19.5-1

2023-01-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Shengjing, On 11-01-2023 09:32, Shengjing Zhu wrote: Please unblock package golang-1.19 But golang-1.19 is in sync between unstable and testing. This is a point release for golang 1.19 which happens today. I suspect you're asking for an exception as golang is on our toolchain list

Bug#1028546: bullseye-pu: package voms-api-java_3.3.2-1+deb11u1

2023-01-12 Thread Mattias Ellert
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu This proposed update fixes a FTBFS in bullseye. It adds the patches used to fix the same issue in testing and unstable. debdiff is attached. Changes: voms-api-java

Processed: unblock: cargo/0.66.0+ds1-1

2023-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:cargo Bug #1028545 [release.debian.org] unblock: cargo/0.66.0+ds1-1 Added indication that 1028545 affects src:cargo -- 1028545: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028545 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#1014460: transition: php8.2

2023-01-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Mike and other Horde maintainers, On 22-10-2022 17:31, Mike Gabriel wrote: For Horde, getting autopkgtests resolved (and packages migrate to testing) is one thing, but getting all of Horde deprecation-warnings-free with php8.2 at run time is a completely different cup of team. (Horde

Re: Bug#1020413: nmu: bind-dyndb-ldap_11.6-3

2023-01-12 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Salvatore Bonaccorso kirjoitti 12.1.2023 klo 9.43: Hi, [Cc'ing Timo, Ondrej] On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 04:39:34PM -, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: Santiago Vila wrote: El 23/9/22 a las 10:21, Timo Aaltonen escribió: Paul Gevers kirjoitti 22.9.2022 klo 22.26: So, Timo, is the package in

Bug#1028528: transition: libcotp

2023-01-12 Thread Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I would like to update libcotp in unstable to the 2.0.0-1. I would like to request a transition slot for libcotp, changing the library name from libcotp12 to

Re: Bug#1020413: nmu: bind-dyndb-ldap_11.6-3

2023-01-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 12-01-2023 09:12, Ondřej Surý wrote: as bind-dyndb-ldap would be removed on 25th of january, which then should unblock the bind9 situation for unstable/bookworm AFAIU, should we ask for removal already earlier? Should it be kept at all, is it used? (popcon seems quite low, but that is

Re: Bug#1020413: nmu: bind-dyndb-ldap_11.6-3

2023-01-12 Thread Ondřej Surý
> On 12. 1. 2023, at 8:43, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > as bind-dyndb-ldap would be removed on 25th of january, which then > should unblock the bind9 situation for unstable/bookworm AFAIU, should > we ask for removal already earlier? Should it be kept at all, is it > used? (popcon seems quite