Greetings.
I'd like to know the status of mumble-server on armhf and arm64 and whether it
can be restored for those architectures, because mumble server is commonly run
on that hardware and is one one of the base expected programs for the FreedomBox
project which has a number of hardware targe
Dear Ted,
On 16-02-2023 23:24, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
But, if the Debian Release team would like to override my position, my
suggestion would be to just change the default for /etc/mke2fs.conf
for *everyone* running Debian bookworm, and with the understanding
that this will be reverted in Debian t
Your message dated Wed, 22 Feb 2023 20:38:17 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1031756: unblock: imagemagick/8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031756,
regarding unblock: imagemagick/8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:54:19 -0500
with message-id <87pma1il9g@fifthhorseman.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#1028472: bullseye-pu: package
publicsuffix/20221208.1942-0+deb11u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1028472,
regarding bullseye-pu: package publicsuffix/20221208.1942-0+d
On Sun 2023-02-19 19:45:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 11:07 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye.
>>
>> This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it
>> current
>> is useful for all the package
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1031212 - moreinfo
Bug #1031212 [release.debian.org] unblock: util-linux/2.38.1-5
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1031212: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Bug #1031788 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
publicsuffix/20230209.2326-0+deb11u1
Added indication that 1031788 affects src:publicsuffix
--
1031788: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031788
Debian Bug Tracking
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye.
This package reflects the state of the netw
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: command-not-fo...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:command-not-found
[ Reason ]
Bug #1029803: command-not-found in bullseye doesn't know the
non-free-fi
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:command-not-found
Bug #1031783 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
command-not-found/20.10.1-1+deb11u1
Added indication that 1031783 affects src:command-not-found
--
1031783: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031783
Debian B
On 2023-02-21 15:43:08 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi Niels
>
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:47:09 +0100 Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> > Sorry for being terse, I should be working on something else right now
> > but prioritized a short message over nothing.
> >
> > Duplicate of #995569.
>
> Sorry, miss
On 2023-02-21 09:45:34 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Michael" == Michael Biebl writes:
> Michael> Excluding packages that only ship overrides/drop-ins, this
> Michael> makes 37 affected packages in bookworm.
>
> If I'm understanding this issue correctly, the concern would be a
> pack
12 matches
Mail list logo
