Hi
I would like to upload lnux version 6.8.12-1 to unstable, which is
importing the last stable version for the 6.8.y series which is EOL
with 6.8.12. After that a switch to 6.9.y will need to happen.
No packaging changes are included.
Regards,
Salvatore
signature.asc
Description: PGP
* Jun MO , 2024-05-31 01:05:
And something "off topic". I find there is a char __glibc_reserved[20]
variable in the struct utmp, which is commented as "Reserved for future
use". Just a brainstorm, if this variable is not currently used, maybe
it can be used to solve the Y2038 problem for wtmp?
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:runc
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
[ Reason ]
This proposed update fixes all the outstanding
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:runc
Bug #1072248 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
runc/1.0.0~rc93+ds1-5+deb11u4
Added indication that 1072248 affects src:runc
--
1072248: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072248
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On 2024-05-15 13:22:13 [+0200], Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Yes, go through experimental if you want to rename it. You'll have to add
> proper conflicts/etc. Let us know once the package is accepted in
> experimental.
The package has been accepted in experimental.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo
Bug #1071121 [release.debian.org] transition: clamav
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1071121: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071121
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
As requested by the security team, I would like to bring the microcode
update level for Intel processors in Bullseye and Bookworm to match what
we have in Sid and
* Jun MO [240530 19:09]:
> On Thu, 30 May 2024 13:18:17 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I agree, this may be useful. Unfortunately, the current status is
> > that one cannot have both: installing wtmpdb forces the upgrade of
> > util-linux to 2.40.1-3 (at least), where "last" is no longer
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
As requested by the security team, I would like to bring the microcode
update level for Intel processors in Bullseye and Bookworm to match what
we have in Sid and
On Thu, 30 May 2024 13:18:17 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I agree, this may be useful. Unfortunately, the current status is
> that one cannot have both: installing wtmpdb forces the upgrade of
> util-linux to 2.40.1-3 (at least), where "last" is no longer installed.
Thanks for the change
* Vincent Lefevre [240530 13:21]:
> On 2024-05-08 16:53:53 +0800, Jun MO wrote:
> > For last(1) my concern is that it will be helped to keep the original
> > last(1) for back-compatibility to read old wtmp files.
>
> I agree, this may be useful. Unfortunately, the current status is
> that one
Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2024 18:41:51 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1070977: transition: snappy
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070977,
regarding transition: snappy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2024 15:54:40 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1070852: transition: gdal
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070852,
regarding transition: gdal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2024 15:51:02 +0200
with message-id <7578d548-9f36-433e-9612-8b34bf053...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1071473: transition: opencascade
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071473,
regarding transition: opencascade
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On 30/05/2024 14:14, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 27, Jonas Meier wrote:
[ ] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
This looks reasonable to me. Should a similar update be proposed for bullseye?
Cheers,
Emilio
On May 27, Jonas Meier wrote:
> [ ] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
diff -Nru dns-root-data-2023010101/debian/changelog
dns-root-data-2024041801~deb12u1/debian/changelog
--- dns-root-data-2023010101/debian/changelog 2023-01-11 16:00:11.0
+0100
+++
On 2024-05-08 16:53:53 +0800, Jun MO wrote:
> For last(1) my concern is that it will be helped to keep the original
> last(1) for back-compatibility to read old wtmp files.
I agree, this may be useful. Unfortunately, the current status is
that one cannot have both: installing wtmpdb forces the
Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2024 09:01:25 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1071948: nmu: polymake_4.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071948,
regarding nmu: polymake_4.11-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1063770 [release.debian.org] transition: mupdf
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1063770: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063770
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 25/05/2024 16:52, Bastian Germann wrote:
On Sun, 5 May 2024 18:29:52 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> ippsample - doesn't seem to use mupdf at all
> pymupdf - requires some changes. Likely also needs to update to new upstream
version.
> sioyek - requires some
20 matches
Mail list logo
