Bug#1072035: bookworm-pu: package dns-root-data/2024041801

2024-05-31 Thread Marco d'Itri
On May 30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > This looks reasonable to me. Should a similar update be proposed for bullseye? Yes, uploaded. diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 97fdbf8..98e603c 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,28 @@ +dns-root-data

Bug#1071235: transition: qt6-base 6.6.2

2024-05-31 Thread Patrick Franz
Hej, Am Freitag, 31. Mai 2024, 09:41:11 CEST schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > On 16/05/2024 23:34, Patrick Franz wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Hi

Processed: your mail

2024-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1071235 by 1072320 Bug #1071235 [release.debian.org] transition: qt6-base 6.6.2 1071235 was not blocked by any bugs. 1071235 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1071235: 1072320 > End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: tagging 1072300 ...

2024-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1072300 + bookworm Bug #1072300 [release.debian.org] RM: phppgadmin/7.13.0+dfsg-2 Added tag(s) bookworm. > retitle 1072300 RM: phppgadmin -- RoM; security issues; incompatible with > bookworm's PostgreSQL version Bug #1072300

Processed: RM: phppgadmin/7.13.0+dfsg-2

2024-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:phppgadmin Bug #1072300 [release.debian.org] RM: phppgadmin/7.13.0+dfsg-2 Added indication that 1072300 affects src:phppgadmin -- 1072300: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072300 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1072300: RM: phppgadmin/7.13.0+dfsg-2

2024-05-31 Thread Leandro Cunha
Package: release.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:phppgadmin X-Debbugs-Cc: phppgad...@packages.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm X-Debbugs-Cc: leandrocunha...@gmail.com Severity: normal Reason and request I open this bug to request the removal of the

Bug#1071614: transition: libmatio13

2024-05-31 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le vendredi 31 mai 2024 à 12:43 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : > On 31/05/2024 12:19, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > Le vendredi 31 mai 2024 à 09:31 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : > > > On 24/05/2024 19:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > > On 22/05/2024 14:49, Sébastien

Re: Y2038-safe replacements for utmp/wtmp and lastlog

2024-05-31 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2024-05-31 01:05:51 +0800, Jun MO wrote: > And if I understood correctly, wtmpdb require program use PAM to update > wtmpdb, thus program not use PAM will still write /var/log/wtmp. For > example, tmux write /var/log/wtmp via libutempter0 and I do not see tmux > depends on pam. GNU Screen and

Re: Y2038-safe replacements for utmp/wtmp and lastlog

2024-05-31 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 06:07, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > * Jun MO , 2024-05-31 01:05: > >And something "off topic". I find there is a char __glibc_reserved[20] > >variable in the struct utmp, which is commented as "Reserved for future > >use". Just a brainstorm, if this variable is not currently used,

Bug#1071614: transition: libmatio13

2024-05-31 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 31/05/2024 12:19, Sébastien Villemot wrote: Le vendredi 31 mai 2024 à 09:31 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : On 24/05/2024 19:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 22/05/2024 14:49, Sébastien Villemot wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc:

Processed: Re: Bug#1053866: marked as done (transition: jpeg-xl)

2024-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #1053866 {Done: Mathieu Malaterre } [release.debian.org] transition: jpeg-xl 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer marked as

Bug#1053866: marked as done (transition: jpeg-xl)

2024-05-31 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: reopen -1 On 31/05/2024 12:36, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: jpeg-xl (0.8.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium . * Upload 0.8.2-4 to unstable. Closes: #1053866 Uploading to unstable doesn't close the transition bug. There are still things to do here, such as binNMUs, and

Bug#1053866: marked as done (transition: jpeg-xl)

2024-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2024 10:34:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1053866: fixed in jpeg-xl 0.8.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1053866, regarding transition: jpeg-xl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Re: Bug#1068017: Y2038-safe replacements for utmp/wtmp and lastlog

2024-05-31 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2024-05-30 18:41:51 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > wtmpdb takes over the "last" name. Unfortunately without support for > reading the old files. Nobody wrote tooling to import them or so. In the new versions of the package, "last" could have been installed under another name (e.g.

Bug#1071614: transition: libmatio13

2024-05-31 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le vendredi 31 mai 2024 à 09:31 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : > On 24/05/2024 19:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 22/05/2024 14:49, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: libma...@packages.debian.org > > > Control:

Processed: FTBFS against libmatio 1.5.27

2024-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 1071614 by -1 Bug #1071614 [release.debian.org] transition: libmatio13 1071614 was not blocked by any bugs. 1071614 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1071614: 1072280 -- 1071614: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071614

Processed: Re: Bug#1071614: transition: libmatio13

2024-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1071614 [release.debian.org] transition: libmatio13 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1071614: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071614 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1071614: transition: libmatio13

2024-05-31 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 24/05/2024 19:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 22/05/2024 14:49, Sébastien Villemot wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: libma...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libmatio User: release.debian@packages.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#1053866: transition: jpeg-xl

2024-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1053866 [release.debian.org] transition: jpeg-xl Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1053866: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053866 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1053866: transition: jpeg-xl

2024-05-31 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 24/05/2024 19:33, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 23/05/2024 08:15, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 11:43 PM Jeremy Bícha wrote: Control: block -1 by 1061627 I was able to build all the reverse dependencies in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS against jpeg-xl

Bug#1071235: transition: qt6-base 6.6.2

2024-05-31 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 16/05/2024 23:34, Patrick Franz wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi Release Team, we would like to request a transition for Qt 6 from 6.4.2 to 6.6.2. To prepare for this

Bug#1061179: marked as done (transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-13)

2024-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2024 09:08:22 +0300 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1061179: transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061179, regarding transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-13 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt