Le 04/10/2024 à 23:52, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
On 2024-09-15 21:05:46 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
Le 15/09/2024 à 20:11, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
To move forward in this regard, we would like to ask the LLVM
maintainers to provide us with a plan for trixie. Which llvm-toolc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
As agreed in bug #1081194, let's upgrade llvm-toolchain one more time.
Various removals:
16 -https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075944
17 -https://bugs.debian.org
leptonlib 1.83.1-4 uploaded to unstable. Also did NMU for dependency level
2 (tesseract, jbig2enc, k2pdfopt). Possibly I did the NMU too soon and the
autobuilders will get confused; will find out soon enough.
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qt6base-abi-6.7.2.html
On 2024-09-14 00:38:24 +0200, Patrick Franz wrote:
> Hej,
>
> On Mon, 09 Sep 2024 22:38:15 +0200 Patrick Franz
> wrote:
> [...]
> > * qgnomeplatform-qt6: Has FTBFS already before
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1081239 [release.debian.org] transition: Qt 6.7.2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qt6base-abi-6.7.2.html
Bug #1081239 [release.debian.org] transition: Qt 6.7.2
Set Bug forwarded-to-address t
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2024-09-20 15:50:52 -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
>
> We will also be updating gnome-control-center as part of this transition.
>
> Although gjs is not a blocker, we have uploaded the new gjs to
> Unstable and are in the process of getting
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1081519 [release.debian.org] transition: gnome-shell 47
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1081519: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1081519
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1081831 [release.debian.org] transition: libgit2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgit2.html
Bug #1081831 [release.debian.org] transition: libgit2
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgit2.html
On 2024-09-15 11:20:20 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: libg...@packages.debian.org, fabi...@debian.org
> Control: affects -1 +
On 2024-09-13 08:50:00 -0400, Benjamin Barenblat wrote:
> On Friday, September 13, 2024, at 11:59 AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Do you also have test results for llvm-toolchain-{15,16,17,18,19}?
>
> I haven't actually tried them. They don't depend on Abseil directly,
> just on gRPC. I th
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1083240 [release.debian.org] transition: jimtcl
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-jimtcl.html
Bug #1083240 [release.debian.org] transition: jimtcl
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://r
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-jimtcl.html
On 2024-10-03 23:06:13 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: jim...@pa
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1083131 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-netclasses
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1083131: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1083131
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2024-10-02 10:40:34 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: gnustep-netclas...@packages.debian.org
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gnustep-netclasses.html
> Control: affec
Hi Alastair
On 2024-08-21 09:16:08 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2024-08-15 10:51:26 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> >
> > On 15/08/2024 10:42, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > On 2024-07-13 10:54:19 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > > > On 12/07/2024 22:56, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Your message dated Fri, 4 Oct 2024 23:52:45 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1081044: transition: nauty 2.8.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081044,
regarding transition: nauty 2.8.9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On 2024-09-15 21:05:46 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 15/09/2024 à 20:11, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> > To move forward in this regard, we would like to ask the LLVM
> > maintainers to provide us with a plan for trixie. Which llvm-toolchain
> > versions are you planning to releas
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2024-09-22 02:41:52 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@packages.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:petsc
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: tran
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1082552 [release.debian.org] transition: petsc and numerical library stack
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1082552: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082552
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Fri, 4 Oct 2024 23:39:22 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1080511: transition: wireshark
has caused the Debian Bug report #1080511,
regarding transition: wireshark
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Fri, 4 Oct 2024 23:37:13 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1081972: nmu: fenics-dolfinx_1:0.8.0-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081972,
regarding nmu: fenics-dolfinx_1:0.8.0-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Fri, 4 Oct 2024 23:34:18 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1082734: transition: rhash
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082734,
regarding transition: rhash
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Fri, 4 Oct 2024 23:34:53 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1081654: transition: gspell 1.14
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081654,
regarding transition: gspell 1.14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Fri, 4 Oct 2024 23:30:25 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1082631: transition: iniparser
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082631,
regarding transition: iniparser
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = confirmed
Bug #1081319 [release.debian.org] transition: leptonlib
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1081319: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1081319
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 2024-10-04 10:19:25 -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Hi Sebastian, may I proceed with transition?
Yes, please go ahead.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Sebastian, may I proceed with transition?
Hi,
I forget to tell you that, .fun will not be reported as false positive
now:)
Thanks for your help.
EiPi Fun/Dong Xu
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Hi!
I briefly asked about this a while back on IRC, and thought I had already filed
this formal request/report, but it seems I failed to actually do that..
Some background information:
The Rust toolchain (
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 10:21:16 + sylvestre...@ledru.info wrote:
Le dimanche 15 septembre 2024 à 21:05, Sylvestre Ledru a
écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> Le 15/09/2024 à 20:11, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
>
> > To move forward in this regard, we would like to ask the LLVM
> > maintainers to provi
Hi Sylvestre,
Thanks for the quick response!
> It is a lot of work for something that has been this way for 10+ years.
Unfortunately this issue is being raised because, although it's
been that way for some period, the decision to retain this changed
SONAME is actively causing issues for other d
31 matches
Mail list logo
