On Thursday, 14. December 2006 12:58, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:39:07AM +, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
* libkexif (0.2.5-2)
Yes, this is a new upstream version, but it is a bugfix release, and it is
necessary in order to avoid a lot of problems with digikam
On Wednesday, 13. December 2006 16:59, Andreas Huggel wrote:
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 03:35, Achim Bohnet wrote:
Hi exiv2 developers,
Hi Andreas,
thx for all the infos comments below.
the debian-release managers do not accept a library
transition from exiv2 0.10 to 0.12 as etch
Hi exiv2 developers,
the debian-release managers do not accept a library
transition from exiv2 0.10 to 0.12 as etch is already
frozen:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-extras/2006-December/002193.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/12/msg4.html
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 10:31, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:15:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
A proposal for a simplification, which reduces/avoids the renaming of
the KDE packages. All KDE packages depend directly or indirectly on
libqt3, so it is enough to rename
Hello,
AFAIU digikam and showimg don't enter testing because libkexif1
can't enter testing because it breaks the digikam and showimg in
testing that depend on libkexif0.
Please hint following pkgs to enter sarge together
digikam=0.7.2-2
showimg=0.9.4.1-1
kipi-plugings=0.1+beta2-20
5 matches
Mail list logo
