Bug#1032162: RM: debian-timeline/45

2023-02-28 Thread Ana Guerrero Lopez
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-timel...@packages.debian.org, debian-public...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:debian-timeline Please, keep debian-timeline out of bookworm, the installed HTML do

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-02 Thread Ana Guerrero Lopez
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:10:04PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these > suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > 15/16 July > 22/23 July > > [SRMs: needs one of you too please :

Re: 8.5 and 7.11 planning

2016-05-15 Thread Ana Guerrero Lopez
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 08:20:28PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to > avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around > the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them both on the > same

Bug#782143: pu: package stunnel4/3:5.06-2+deb8u1

2016-02-03 Thread Ana Guerrero Lopez
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 01:45:11AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Control: retitle -1 pu: package stunnel4/3:5.06-2+deb8u1 > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:35:28PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Control: retitle -1 pu: package stunnel4/3:5.06-3 > > Control: tag -1 jessie > > > > On Wed, Apr 0

Bug#770712: pre-approval for unblock opensm/3.3.18-2

2014-12-06 Thread Ana Guerrero Lopez
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed > > Hi Ana, > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 03:40:38PM +0100, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote: > > I intend to upload a new version of opensm to address

Bug#770712: pre-approval for unblock opensm/3.3.18-2

2014-11-23 Thread Ana Guerrero Lopez
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I intend to upload a new version of opensm to address #769742 with the attached changes. If it's all OK, the package will go to NEW and once it's accepted in the archice, ibutils and in

Bug#753474: transition: libibumad/libibmad/opensm

2014-07-07 Thread Ana Guerrero Lopez
Hi, On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:17:37AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > The tracker still reports srptools as bad. Are you going to upload it or > should > we binNMU it? Yes, I'll upload it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsu

Bug#753474: transition: libibumad/libibmad/opensm

2014-07-02 Thread Ana Guerrero Lopez
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, I'd like to migrate libibumad and other two OFED libraries, libibmad and opensm from experimental to unstable. The three of them have a new soname. See: http://release.debian.org/t