changed).
Finally there's also gnat-4.9.
nmu binutils-z80_4 . ALL . -m Rebuilt against binutils 2.25-5.
nmu binutils-mingw-w64_5.1 . ALL . -m Rebuilt against binutils 2.25-5.
nmu binutils-arm-none-eabi_5 . ALL . -m Rebuilt against binutils 2.25-5.
Ansgar
[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/users
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On 01/27/2015 07:48 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2015-01-27 09:53, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
user-mode-linux is built against an old kernel version
. -m Rebuilt against linux
3.16.7-ckt4-1.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/20150127085349.4032.50400.report...@deep-thought.43-1.org
the current version.
nmu user-mode-linux_3.2-2um-1+deb7u2 . ALL . -m Rebuilt against linux
3.2.65-1+deb7u1.
(Note that the binary version for user-mode-linux is at +b2.)
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
this means you cannot schedule binNMUs for
the security archive for source packages not present there.
Ansgar
[1] It works for d-i binNMUs in stable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
execution if a program
using libquvi is run in a directory such as /tmp.
unblock libquvi/0.4.1-3
Ansgar
diff -Nru libquvi-0.4.1/debian/changelog libquvi-0.4.1/debian/changelog
--- libquvi-0.4.1/debian/changelog 2014-05-27 10:25:54.0 +0200
+++ libquvi-0.4.1/debian/changelog 2015-01-04 12:53
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
dak copy-installer 20150107
Done.
Thanks for all your work on d-i,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On 2014-12-21 20:12, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 04:20:16PM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2014-12-14 at 16:19 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
[...]
I have no fixed plans yet, but would prefer to keep 3rd/4th free
not crazy), but
I don’t find mails from the archive bots about it.
@ftp-master: Can you tell what I did wrong?
The .changes was signed with your old key:
gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 23 19:57:51 2014 CET
gpg:using DSA key 0xF628EB934743206C
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Saturday morning, but will be afk from early
afternoon to Sunday afternoon
31st / 1st - Fine for me
I have no fixed plans yet, but would prefer to keep 3rd/4th free. The
other days all look fine.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On 10/02/2014 01:29, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 00:06:30 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
I would like to update at in Debian Wheezy: bash can now export
variables of the form BASH_FUNC_*() which at cannot handle as they
cannot be set via assignment in the shell
...
With the change below, at will just skip variables that would just
give an error in the generated shell script later. at 3.1.16-1 which I
uploaded to unstable yesterday has the same change.
Ansgar
diff -u at-3.1.13/debian/changelog at-3.1.13/debian/changelog
--- at-3.1.13/debian/changelog
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose
we go for one of:
11/12 October
18/19 October
25/26 October
All of these are still good for me.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
/13
- July 19/20
- July 26/27
I have no plans on most dates yet, with the exception of July 5/6.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87oay8v14v
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org writes:
On 28/04/14 14:46, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
enet had a soname change (just accepted into experimental) and needs a
transition. The ABI changes should be unproblematic (just new members
in a public struct). There also are only a few rdeps
a few rdeps.
Ansgar
Ben file:
title = enet;
is_affected = .depends ~ libenet2a | .depends ~ libenet7;
is_good = .depends ~ libenet7;
is_bad = .depends ~ libenet2a;
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
wondering if it might make sense to push the date
back a week, to May 3rd, and give ourselves time to get things sorted
without rushing at the end of the week.
On the initial call, everyone indicated that they would be available
that weekend; is that still the case?
Should still be okay.
Ansgar
of them yet. So any choice
should be fine for me.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/531d7f10.1030...@debian.org
Hi,
On 01/08/2014 06:50 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
How are people fixed for:
8th / 9th February
15th / 16th February
22nd / 23rd February
1st / 2nd March
I'm still free on all dates.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Rebuilt against gdb 7.6.1.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20131231210359.25796.87888.report...@deep-thought.43-1.org
oldstable itself is signed with the release team's key, -security
and other suites are not).
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ppqufl5n@deep
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertag: opu
On 10/20/2013 18:10, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 04:06:06PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
The security update for chrony links against libreadline6 on
amd64. However chrony is licensed
to
libreadline-gplv2-dev with no alternative (to require the GPL-2+
version). This could also replace the version currently in the
security archive.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
dominate should just
ignore accepted.
So usually you can just ignore the accepted suite. It doesn't mean
anything interesting.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
/watch for the unstable release.
This option is ignored by uscan in wheezy.
Ansgar
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 038e73f..ac173f7 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,48 @@
+commit 092c59b
+Author: Toni Gundogdu lega...@gmail.com
+Date: 2013-10-04
+
+Bump version to 0.4.19
]
and they were displayed.
[1] http://www.wiley.com/legacy/compbooks/vrml2sbk/toc/toc.htm
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87mwmo7wo2@deep
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org (2013-10-05):
A new upstream version of libquvi-scripts was released today and
uploaded to unstable. It includes fixes for liveleak.com and
funnyordie.com.
I'm not entirely sure if it is a good idea to try to include
/arch_qualify.html#sparc-upstream
So it might make sense to drop sparc in any case and add sparc64 if
there are enough people interested.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org (2013-09-16):
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
I would like to update libquvi-scripts in wheezy again. Not
surprisingly it needed changes for various sites, see NEWS in the
attached diff. Note that I've
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org (2013-08-17):
I've prepared an update for gxine that switches to libmozjs185-dev from
libmozjs-dev as gxine fails to build with newer versions of the latter
package.
The same change was already done in unstable
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org (2013-08-17):
I prepared an update for openvrml that disable JavaScript support as
the package fails to build with newer versions of libmozjs-dev. As it
might be used to view downloaded files, I think it should not use
against
linux 3.2.51-1.
(not sure about the -d option)
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130922203020.17756.69820.report...@eisei.43-1.org
) includes fixes for Iceweasel 22,
but upstream stopped maintaining chmsee after this[2]. If the maintainer
of the Debian package doesn't plan to keep supporting the package, I
think it should be removed from wheezy. It's not useful to keep it now
just to throw it out with Iceweasel 24.
Ansgar
[1
for a web browser (as it has broken sandboxing as far as I
understand it).
The package needs either to be removed from stable or be fixed, either
by porting to the newer JS engine or by disabling support for JS (not
sure if this is possible in an easy way).
Ansgar
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/707346
iceweasel 17 and 24, but hasn't been updated in Debian. Given it
has no reverse dependencies I think the package should be removed from
wheezy (and possibly unstable as well).
Ansgar
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/713221
[2] http://hg.mozilla.org/pyxpcom/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
I would like to update libquvi-scripts in wheezy again. Not surprisingly
it needed changes for various sites, see NEWS in the attached diff. Note
that I've clean the diff a bit and removed autotools and version change
noise.
libquvi-scripts/0.4.18-1
python3.3.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130908133624.15722.99680.report...@deep-thought.43-1.org
autotools and version change
noise.
Ansgar
diff -Nru libquvi-scripts-0.4.15/NEWS libquvi-scripts-0.4.18/NEWS
--- libquvi-scripts-0.4.15/NEWS 2013-05-09 12:16:55.0 +0200
+++ libquvi-scripts-0.4.18/NEWS 2013-09-03 18:24:08.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,39 @@
+v0.4.18 (2013-09-03) / Toni
guess).
And yet another idea: ask ftp-master to copy the perl 5.18 packages from
sid to tpu when they're ready, and binNMU subversion in tpu. Seems
easier than my first suggestion, if ftp-master is willing to do that.
I think that's okay.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release
in unstable as part of fixing #66.
Ansgar
diff -Nru gxine-0.5.907/debian/changelog gxine-0.5.907/debian/changelog
--- gxine-0.5.907/debian/changelog 2012-06-08 18:57:10.0 +0200
+++ gxine-0.5.907/debian/changelog 2013-08-17 10:07:04.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+gxine (0.5.907-2+deb7u1
it should not use
libmozjs185-dev which has broken sandboxing (as far as I understand).
Note that this bug (#710616) is not fixed in unstable yet, but included
in the suggested patch for #710082.
Ansgar
diff -u openvrml-0.18.9/debian/changelog openvrml-0.18.9/debian/changelog
--- openvrml-0.18.9/debian
On 06/25/2013 17:21, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 13:58:51 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Please schedule a binNMU for njplot to make it pick up libvibrant6 instead of
libvibrant6a.
nmu njplot_2.4-2 . armel armhf mips s390 s390x sparc . -m Rebuild against
libvibrant6.
Meh
package name.
nmu bbpager_0.4.7-3 . amd64 armel i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips
mipsel powerpc s390 sparc . -m Build against libbt0.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please schedule a binNMU for netexpect to make it pick up the new wireshark
libraries.
nmu netexpect_0.20-3 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libwireshark3, libwsutil3,
libwiretap3.
Ansgar
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please schedule a binNMU for njplot to make it pick up libvibrant6 instead of
libvibrant6a.
nmu njplot_2.4-2 . armel armhf mips s390 s390x sparc . -m Rebuild against
libvibrant6.
Ansgar
.
nmu ncbi-tools6_6.1.20120620-3 . i386 . -m Rebuild in a clean environment.
As the package builds Multi-Arch: same binaries, it might be useful to rebuild
it on the other architectures (or at least on amd64) as well.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please schedule a binNMU to build slurm-drmaa against libslurm25.
nmu slurm-drmaa_1.0.6-2 . ALL . -m Build against libslurm25.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
On 06/15/2013 00:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:51:18 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Uploaded yesterday evening and already built for all archs (although
the kfreebsd-i386 build is still pending upload for some reason).
Scheduled binNMUs for the rdeps.
All packages were
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 19:57:16 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
I would like to upgrade enet in unstable to 1.3.7 which means a soname
change. The new package is already uploaded to experimental and waiting
for buildds to become available
only).
Should I worry about this? Is which way is this information correct?
That should be the release team's playground.
I don't know why they report on version in p-u compared to testing, but
it probably doesn't mean anything bad.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 09:39 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Just a quick reminder as winter^W the p-u-NEW freeze is coming. It would
be nice if this could be included in the upcoming point release.
Please go ahead, thanks; sorry for the delays
On 05/22/2013 08:46, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org (09/05/2013):
Today upstream released 0.4.15 which includes fixes for various sites:
[...]
I uploaded it to unstable. Looking at wheezy can probably wait until it
migrated
for some architectures were rejected as
experimental had an older version. Those should be removed and
the .changes moved back to unchecked as well.)
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On 2013-06-03 9:46, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
the security update for iceweasel targeted at wheezy ended up in NEW.
What would you like us to do with it?
We could add the overrides, reject it from NEW and move the package
back
to unchecked
in a squeeze environment and depends on package not available
there (#710054).
nmu irssi_0.8.15-5~bpo60+1 . i386 . -m Rebuild in Squeeze.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
= .depends ~ libenet1a;
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130525175716.7270.76794.report...@deep-thought.43-1.org
depending on libgexiv2-1.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130520105018.32560.3866.report...@eisei.43-1.org
-1.13-0.
nmu syncevolution_1.2.99.1-1.1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libcppunit-1.13-0.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130520105340.32617.73560
-addons_1.47.1-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libxtables10.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130520105639.32669.31194.report...@eisei.43-1.org
-10 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libexosip2-10.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130520105944.32724.48075.report...@eisei.43-1.org
] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obc5ewku.fsf...@eisei.43-1.org
. -m Rebuild against libminc2-3.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130520111753.532.55503.report...@eisei.43-1.org
in experimental and is now gone.)
nmu qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-6a . amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390x
sparc . -m Rebuild against libusbredirparser1.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
, #709035.)
nmu xen-api_1.3.2-15 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libxen-4.2.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130520113155.968.93947.report
On 05/12/2013 20:56, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Based on some informal queries a little while ago, the weekend of 15/16
June looks like a good date for the first wheezy point release. Would
that work for everyone?
I can do the ftpmaster side.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release
libgearman-dev (= 1.0.5-2)
or ALL -hurd-i386 in the arch list?
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130515175218.7796.27605.report...@deep-thought.43-1
Rebuild against libirrlicht1.8.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130514063756.2654.20214.report...@eisei.43-1.org
format. I think that's fairly unlikely.
As mentioned in my mail to -devel@ this also requires buildds to add
binary-only=yes to changelog entries (#681292).
Ansgar
diff -Nru debhelper-9.20130509/dh_installchangelogs debhelper-9.20130509+nmu1/dh_installchangelogs
--- debhelper-9.20130509
for wheezy proposed updates?
It works, yes.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51923dbb.2010...@debian.org
.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130512100501.7637.1850.report...@deep-thought.43-1.org
libmidgard2-2010.05.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130509111055.9590.58896.report...@deep-thought.43-1.org
Control: retitle -1 pu: libquvi-scripts/0.4.15-1~deb7u1
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 10:01 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 03/19/2013 20:10, Julien Cristau wrote:
Not sure there's still time for this. Might need to defer to 7.0.1
instead
Hi,
the architecture status page for Wheezy[1] mentioned that it would be
the last release if s390x comes in. As Wheezy was release with the
s390x support, should we now look at removing s390 from both jessie and sid?
Ansgar
[1] http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html#s390
,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874nee683i@eisei.43-1.org
Control: retitle -1 nmu: user-mode-linux_3.2-2um-1
On 03/14/2013 07:41, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
With linux 3.2.39-2 having migrated to testing, I think user-mode-linux should
get rebuilt against the new kernel sources as well:
nmu user-mode-linux_user-mode-linux . ALL . -m Rebuilt against
backwards. We really don't
want this.
Is there any reason not to use 3.0.22-3+really$(something-else)? That
would be higher than the version in unstable.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
to unstable. It's not urgent so waiting until after
the Wheezy release should be fine.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5152b580.1030...@debian.org
against linux 3.2.39-2
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130314064142.17884.65050.report...@eisei.43-1.org
, only via libquvi.
In addition support for new sites usually happens via a new Lua script
file: if it's broken, it shouldn't affect other scripts.
Ansgar
[1] http://repo.or.cz/w/libquvi-scripts.git/blob/refs/tags/v0.4.13:/NEWS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
opendnssec/1:1.3.9-5 is now in unstable.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obf0idb3@eisei.43-1.org
instead of wheezy in the .changes (which should be
fixed now)...
As Adam already pointed out we would still need another d-i upload to
unstable to make sure unstable has a higher-or-equal version compared to
testing.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
/upload.debian.org/queued/log.*.xz.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ehgwvxzr.fsf...@eisei.43-1.org
testing please.
Removal requests from stable (and testing) are handled by the release team.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5107ca1a.4060
On 01/10/2013 05:57 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2013-01-08 16:48, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Sources only referenced by Built-Using will have a field
Extra-Source-Only: yes
Your demo seems to be using ExtraSourceOnly. :)
Yep, I was confused as we use CamelCase in Release, but
Words
Sources with
cd /home/ansgar/public_html/root/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/dists
zdiff -d -u testing{-old,}/main/source/Sources.gz
The files are also accessible from [2].
Niels, could you update the patch to britney you prepared earlier?
Ansgar
[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/users
is still interested in this?
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/611312#10
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87mwyge6p8@deep-thought.43-1.org
as it currently is and later migrate an updated version?
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zk2gcmgn@deep-thought.43-1.org
.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k3tl4mzr@deep-thought.43-1.org
/default.ldif - /usr/share/bdii/default.ldif is
correct.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k3u37ncj@eisei.43-1.org
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 13:26 +, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
I prepared an update for clive. It adapts clive to changes on youtube.com;
the
problem and patch are basically the same as #688972 in libquvi-scripts.
Please go ahead; thanks
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I prepared an update for clive. It adapts clive to changes on youtube.com; the
problem and patch are basically the same as #688972 in libquvi-scripts.
Ansgar
diff -Nru clive-2.2.13/debian
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 20:56:00 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Stuart Prescott stu...@debian.org writes:
Looking at the underscore package in squeeze-backports, it is not possible
to
build it from source using packages in squeeze+squeeze
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 20:59:24 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Sure. I've attached the debdiff for an upload to wheezy (there's a
newer version in unstable). The changes are the same as in the
backport.
Ack, please go ahead.
Uploaded (without
. (This is also a problem for the package currently
in squeeze.)
I've attached the debdiff minus the actual changes to the *.pm modules
which describe the timezones as these are quite long and mostly boring.
Ansgar
diff -Nru libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.46/Changes libdatetime-timezone-perl-1.49
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock libquvi-scripts. It includes a fix for YouTube.
unblock libquvi-scripts/0.4.8-3
Ansgar
diff -Nru libquvi-scripts-0.4.8/debian/changelog libquvi-scripts-0.4.8/debian
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
Please schedule binNMUs to for the packages below to make them use xz
compression for the binary packages (via the changes to pkg-kde-tools
and cdbs).
I've indicated approximate space savings in kB, but they might be
slightly off as I use old data
savings in kB, but they might be
slightly off as I use old data for the size they would need with xz.
Ansgar
nmu kdepim-runtime_4:4.4.11.1-5 . ALL . -m Rebuild with xz compression.
- kdepim-runtime 808
nmu kdepim_4:4.4.11.1+l10n-3 . ALL . -m Rebuild with xz compression.
- kmail 4061
- korganizer
Control: retitle -1 unblock: libquvi-scripts/0.4.8-2
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 16:43 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
I would like to include the version of libquvi-scripts currently in
experimental in wheezy. It includes various fixes to continue
days.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r4qmspuu@deep-thought.43-1.org
, but now there are some).
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k3wmg6pi@deep-thought.43-1.org
101 - 200 of 297 matches
Mail list logo
