Re: Developer accessible SPARC machine

440Mhz. The crappy IDE controler on the Ultra 5, the slow disks it usualy has, the small cache on the 270Mhz and 360Mhz models, the max of 512 Megs of memory limit (1 gig with low-profile third party), and the general low quality for sun design are the reasons I wouldn't recomend one.

Re: opensp?

c pbuilder Oct 28. I do not sign/upload in such cases at James Troup's request. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

nntp not propigating to testing

nntp 1.5.12.1-19 fixed the release criitcal bug 61 days ago, but it has not propigated to testing. The pts claims this is because it is buggy. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an

Re: release policy text changes

with requirements of the LSB, >v1.3. Perhaps the latter should be modified to allow for explicit conflicts with LSB for optional or extra packages? -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failu

Re: packages not built on sparc due to fixed sparc kernel bug

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:30:13AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: >> At least four packages (illuminator, fet, scalapack, kmd) are failing >> to build on sparc due to a kernel bug that is fixed in the current >> sarge versions. (

packages not built on sparc due to fixed sparc kernel bug

mage-2.4.27-2-sparc64 version 2.4.27-2 kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64 version 2.6.8-6 Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC - End forwarded message - -- Bl

cnews being held out of testing by missing arm build

cnews cr.g7-38 that fixes release-critical bug 302573 is being held out of testing by the missing arm build. Please consider allowing it into testing without the arm build. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With

Re: Where should I request forgotten rebuilds?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Where would I request that? On the respective porters list? Somewhere else? To contact a buildd administrator, send mail to @buildd.debian.org . (Where is the appropriate architecture.) -- Blars Blarson

Re: Bug#275620: netboot hang sparc32

is currently holding up the build of d-i rc2. (rootskel depends on glibc which does not build due to a binutils bug.) -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.

Re: FTFBS in sarge

from either debian-devel or the buildd maintainer, (who I later discovered has problems sending me email) I uploaded the packages built in a pbuilder chroot. Another package failed on the sparc buildd because /etc/services was missing, I uploaded it as well. -- Blars Blarson [EMA

binutils causing many packages to fail to build

several weeks on the slower architectures if they are affected as badly. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.

strace 4.5.6-1.1

architectures. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.

Re: ecartis rc bugs are woody only

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:36:06AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: >> Since the release-critical bugs in ecartis are not present in the >> version in sid, would it be possible to get the removal of it from >> sarge recended? &g

ecartis rc bugs are woody only

problem. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.