Re: C++ ABI transition for etch

On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 01:31:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:15:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > A proposal for a simplification, which reduces/avoids the renaming of > > the KDE packages. All KDE packages depend directly or indirectly on > > libqt3, so it is en

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Adrian Bunk wrote: >> - testing, unstable or Debian 3.0 with backports aren't suitable for >> production systems > > Of course it is, Debian 3.0 with a few _selected_ backports works > nice, also on production systems. Err, do you realize you'r