Please add stumpwm into testing

2012-07-23 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi release team, [ CC me please. ] stumpwm, which is maintained by me, was been removed from testing due to #649707. Actually, this bug should be merged with #647544 and closed when cl-asdf/2:2.019-1 was uploaded. But the submitter and I had never done it. Now I've closed it. Please add

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-18 Thread Desmond O. Chang
It seems that both you and Mehdi don't receive the author's mail.  His mail has been sent to debbugs.  Do I need to forward it to you? Hi, I have to confirm again. Did you receive the mails from the author and me? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-18 Thread Desmond O. Chang
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 23:29, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Most of his answer seemed to be about why we should accept the newer version of cl-asdf rather than the source format change; lintian didn't like the empty diff.gz and people on IRC told me to do it aren't the

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-12 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Adam, On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 03:40, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:35 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: I will contact the author and let him decide. Any news on that? It seems that both you and Mehdi don't receive the author's mail. His mail has

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-06 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Mehdi, On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 17:06, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: I might have skipped something. Could you please explain why it's important to have this version in Squeeze? and which rc-bugs does it fix? (It looks like none but I could be wrong). The upstream author uses the

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-06 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi, On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 05:44, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: On 12/06/2010 07:17 PM, Desmond O. Chang wrote: And, it even (silently) turn the package into a source format 3.0 which isn't acceptable at this point of the freeze. Do you mean it must be 1.0?  But common-lisp

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-05 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package cl-asdf cl-asdf (2:2.011-1) unstable; urgency=low * Mostly same as 2.010.9: several minor tweaks and bug fixes since 2.010. * Will be happier: users of

Bug#606068: unblock: common-lisp-controller/7.5

2010-12-05 Thread Desmond O. Chang
on cl-asdf (= 2:2.009-1) + Suggests: darcs for 'clc-clbuild setup' (Closes: #578740). -- Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:37:16 +0800 common-lisp-controller (7.4+nmu2) unstable; urgency=high * Non-maintainer upload. * Same as 7.4+nmu1, but also when preinst is invoked

Freeze exception: common-lisp-controller 7.4

2010-08-24 Thread Desmond O. Chang
++ depends on cl-asdf (= 2:2.004-1) + + -- Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:37:48 +0800 + common-lisp-controller (7.3) unstable; urgency=low * update manpage (Closes: #589185) diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 42c0e5a..905ee3e 100644 --- a/debian