Re: Upload of GNOME 2.8 to unstable

Steve Langasek wrote: For the benefit of those following the discussion who haven't already heard via IRC or otherwise, Thanks for that. Second, KDE in unstable is not a good model to follow. Between longstanding FTBFS bugs that ensured KDE 3.3 could not migrate to testing regardless o

Re: Upload of GNOME 2.8 to unstable

Some comments from someone external to debian : Jordi Mallach wrote: > Hello release team, > > The GNOME team have been talking about what the chances are of having > GNOME 2.8 uploaded to unstable since it was released upstream early in > September. Might personnal wishes would be to have the m

package in / package out

Hello, Is there a way to get the following information : - terse mode of this list, ie a {html,txt,*} page listing all the packages removed from testing since the freeze. - a regression page : list of package which were in woody but are not in sarge. - release (un)candidate list : list of pote

Re: Bug#260508: Removal suggestion

Steve Langasek wrote: On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:25:45PM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote: i would like to suggest to remove sympa from testing. Looking in sympa-package at the BSP on weekend showed me, that current upstream version is 4.1, current Debian version is 3.4.4. Sympa in Debian has secu