Re: Wheezy point release planning

Hi, On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 07:56:51PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > Based on some informal queries a little while ago, the weekend of 15/16 > June looks like a good date for the first wheezy point release. Would > that work for everyone? It wouldn't probably work for me, but if no one

Re: 6.0.7 planning

Hi, On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 04:25:38PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > We're somewhat overdue with the next Squeeze point release (6.0.7) and > it'd be good to get it done before the wheezy release, so that we can > pull in some upgrade fixes. As an opening gambit, some proposed dates, >

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:13:53AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > > That should be read as "let's settle for Sep 29". > > > > I'm around with a press hat if needed. > Me too. Cheers, Francesca -- "You're scared of mice and

Re: Planning for final lenny point release (5.0.10)

Hi, [quotation re-ordered] On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:11:46PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > 25-26/2 - Steve's not available for CDs > > > > > > 3-4/3 - Cambridge BSP. Should be do-able as long as I can get decent > > > connecti

Debian artwork call for proposals on next DPN

Hi all, what is the status about the call for proposals? As Jeremiah has kindly provided a first draft, can we add it to the next DPN in order to better promote participation to it? Is this ok for the desktop Team? And for the release Team? Cheers, Francesca -- "People assume that time is a stri

Re: new hardware support: calling for testing

Hi all, On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 01:16:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] Ben, thank you for the draft! Below my proposal (only few lines integrating Ben's draft): [@publicity team: I've added it also to svn repo, feel free to improve it!] == Upcoming point releases and call for tests ==