Re: Upload of fwknop to stable-proposed-updates

2013-08-08 Thread Franck JONCOURT
Hi Adam, On 07.08.2013 19:48, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 16:11 +0200, Franck Joncourt wrote: I would like to upload a new release of fwknop to stable-proposed-updates in order to fix the following issue : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717754 The patch

Upload of fwknop to stable-proposed-updates

2013-08-07 Thread Franck Joncourt
@@ +fwknop (2.0.0rc2-2+deb7u2) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low + + * Fixed use of uninitialized variable that leads fwknop to randomly fail +to send a SPA packet. New patch : 717754.patch (Closes: #717754) + + -- Franck Joncourt Sat, 27 Jul 2013 22:02:32 +0200 + fwknop (2.0.0rc2-2+deb7u1

Re: CVE against the fwknop package

2012-11-19 Thread Franck Joncourt
Le 11/11/2012 17:20, Julien Cristau a écrit : On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 21:29:18 +0200, Franck Joncourt wrote: Hi, I have prepared an upload for squeeze to fix the CVEs against the 2.0.0rc2 release. I have enclosed a debdiff. The new package will be named fwknop_2.0.0rc2-2+deb7u1.dsc. It is

Re: CVE against the fwknop package

2012-10-20 Thread Franck Joncourt
Hi all, Le 16/10/2012 08:34, Franck Joncourt a écrit : Le 15/10/2012 22:19, Julien Cristau a écrit : On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 21:32:53 +0200, Franck Joncourt wrote: Le 15/10/2012 19:31, Julien Cristau a écrit : On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 21:29:18 +0200, Franck Joncourt wrote: I have

Re: CVE against the fwknop package

2012-10-15 Thread Franck Joncourt
Hi Julien, Le 15/10/2012 22:19, Julien Cristau a écrit : On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 21:32:53 +0200, Franck Joncourt wrote: Le 15/10/2012 19:31, Julien Cristau a écrit : On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 21:29:18 +0200, Franck Joncourt wrote: Hi, I have prepared an upload for squeeze to fix the CVEs

Re: CVE against the fwknop package

2012-10-15 Thread Franck Joncourt
[...] The diff looks mostly ok, though checking for S_ISLNK from stat(2) seems useless, and I'm not quite sure why the chmod is done *after* writing the config file rather than upfront. I have added the patches to fix the permission issues as done per upstream but keeping in mind no to change

Re: CVE against the fwknop package

2012-10-15 Thread Franck Joncourt
Le 15/10/2012 19:31, Julien Cristau a écrit : On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 21:29:18 +0200, Franck Joncourt wrote: Hi, I have prepared an upload for squeeze to fix the CVEs against the 2.0.0rc2 release. I have enclosed a debdiff. The new package will be named fwknop_2.0.0rc2-2+deb7u1.dsc. It is

Re: CVE against the fwknop package

2012-10-15 Thread Franck Joncourt
Hi, Le 11/10/2012 00:15, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : On 10.10.2012 20:29, Franck Joncourt wrote: I have prepared an upload for squeeze to fix the CVEs against the 2.0.0rc2 release. I have enclosed a debdiff. I assume you meant wheezy here? squeeze has 1.9. Yes, I meant wheezy :) Sorry for

Re: CVE against the fwknop package

2012-10-11 Thread Franck Joncourt
Hi Adam, Le 11/10/2012 00:15, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : On 10.10.2012 20:29, Franck Joncourt wrote: I have prepared an upload for squeeze to fix the CVEs against the 2.0.0rc2 release. I have enclosed a debdiff. I assume you meant wheezy here? squeeze has 1.9. Yes, I meant wheezy :) Sorry

CVE against the fwknop package

2012-10-10 Thread Franck Joncourt
Hi, I have prepared an upload for squeeze to fix the CVEs against the 2.0.0rc2 release. I have enclosed a debdiff. The new package will be named fwknop_2.0.0rc2-2+deb7u1.dsc. It is targetted for the testing-proposed-updates with urgency set to high. Can someone check the update so that I can upl