"Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 19:45 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 20:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [...]
>> >> - add an appropriate fixed version to #
>> - add an appropriate fixed version to #612924, which right now claims
>> not to be fixed in any version
>>
>> - prepare an updated package and send a debdiff to -release for an ack
>
> Ping?
Pong. I've got it on my radar, but wasn't able to spend any t
re an
upload with the line commented?
Regards, Frank
Frank Küster wrote:
> Dear stable release managers,
>
> we have a bug report against our package texlive-base in stable that
> might be worth fixing in squeeze, or not. Therefore I am asking your
> opinion.
>
> There is buggy
record the information there - and it will find its way into Debian.
Lionel is not aware of this mechanism, so it is only natural what he
suggests. Which is essentially what we do, just not by firing up an
editor on debian/copyright.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Sprecher B90/Grüne OV Milten
ve disappeared,
Hm, just googling for ucs.dtx gives some hits in comp.text.tex from this
year, talking about taking over maintainership by Wolfgang Jeltsch.
There is a ucs.dtx at
http://softbase.org/latex-unicode/
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Sprecher B90/Grüne OV Miltenberg und Umge
ot;$1" "$2"
-resurrect_conffile_sid /etc/texmf/tex/generic/config/pdftexconfig.tex
texlive-base "$1" "$2"
+#resurrect_conffile_sid /etc/texmf/tex/generic/config/pdftexconfig.tex
texlive-base "$1" "$2"
plus the usual changelog etc.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Kü
re an NMU, chances are
nothing's going to happen until, err, what's the successor of squeeze
going to be called?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
VCD Miltenberg, ADFC Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rele
hat
makes it a serious bug.
> I think that getting the fix into a point release ie. 6.1 as a
> backport to 11.85 would be reasonable.
I agree - delaying squeeze because of that would be ridiculous.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
VCD Miltenberg, ADFC Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg
B90/Grüne
-bin-doc
Replaces: texlive-base-bin-doc
Provides: texlive-base-bin-doc
and then the package should go away smoothly, without any problems
during dist-upgrade?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Mil
warning, and
indeed I couldn't recommend anyone to use Debian's TeXLive in squeeze,
would it be TL 2007.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
:31.0 +0200
+++
texlive-extra-2005.dfsg.3.new/debian/texlive-formats-extra.root/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/config/mllatex.ini
2009-07-02 11:08:36.0 +0200
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
+\scrollmode
\input latex.ltx
--8<---cut here---end------->8-
Hi,
nothing new in here - I just noticed the [SRM] tag in the subject and
thought I'd rather "resend" with it included. Fullquote following,
Regards, Frank
Frank Küster wrote:
> Dear release managers,
>
> I am right now uploading an again-installable tetex-bin to
>
bug won't show up soon)?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
---
texk/tetex/fmtutil | 50 --
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I
ed a couple of days until we have decided (together with upstream)
which approach to take.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.or
-common is
already installed before the upgrade, or the new, not-buggy package
would be unpacked without tex-common present.)
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-re
005/12/01}
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
1.11.2common infrastructure for building
-- debconf information:
tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
tex-common/check_texmf_missing:
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e it
contains a considerable number of changes. Nearly all of them seem to be
related to the build failure, but I'm not sure.
The general freeze exceptions file contains version 1.18 - does that
mean we only need to consider the changes from 1.17 to 1.18?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küs
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> as explained in my earlier mails, I request that you grant a
>> lenny-ignore tag to bug
>>
>> #477060 texlive-base: license of amslatex is unclea
compiles and
maybe code fixes.
Which I do not expect, since
- the TeX team is no less overworked since I first asked the release
team about the issue in July, and
- the release team doesn't seem to have any manpower to handle this.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (Te
Hi Adeodato,
Adeodato Simó net.com.org.es> writes:
> After reviewing, I think everything is fine for lenny. I've added an
> unblock.
Now that you have touched tex-common, will you also be responsible for our
question regarding the remaining texlive RC bugs? Or is someone else
responsible?
TI
Hi all,
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> I kindly request your advice on handling three RC bugs in TeXLive
> packages,
will someone among you find time to handle this issue? You are probably
aware that the texlive cannot simply be removed if
pa phonetic fonts are outdated (superseded by tipa), and my guess is
that any actively developped package related to phonetics has switched
to tipa.
I'd appreciate your comments,
Frank
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by default (XeTeX and luaTeX instead). I'd rather remove
it from what's pulled in by "texlive" by then. Other examples might be
the removal from the default install of our copy of the PS base fonts
once the TeX Gyre fonts, their improved successors, are available in
Debian.
Do you generally oppose such ideas? If not, which approach would you
suggest?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
by tetex-bin.
> that
> sounds like a net decrease in quality to me...
The change is not avoidable. I think it's better to make it clear
*now*.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
ld we do to prevent luatex-snapshot from entering testing? We
can't guarantee a new snapshot every 10 days ;-)
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
uld like to have the freedom to change their dependencies as we
learn about users' needs, without bothering whether some package is
broken by this.
- It would be nice if tetex-doc, and therefore the complete tetex-base
source package, could be removed.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single
Hi,
I wonder why nobody answered to this - when and/or how will it be
decided whether this is a release goal?
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> the TeX Task Force proposes the following release goal:
>
> "No dependencies (Depends/Recomme
f newcomers?
Regards, Frank
P.S. I've seen important bugs show up on http://bts.turmzimmer.net/,
that's probably they are related to release goals? Would be nice if
that was indicated even in the overview (didn't check in the detailed
list), something like "new (release goal)&q
in/make -f
#
# do not edit this file, instead edit rules.in!
-# $Id: rules.in 2034 2006-12-11 07:19:37Z frank $
+# $Id: rules 2087 2006-12-19 12:42:02Z frank $
# The debian/rules(.in) file was nearly completely rewritten by
# Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] in 2004, with patches by
@@
Otavio Salvador debian.org> writes:
> Frank Küster debian.org> writes:
Sorry for the late answer, I'm not subscribed to -release and didn't see this
follow-up. Please Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you reply, I can't do that in
the gmane interface.
> Frank Küster deb
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:35:35AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> The new tetex-base package for etch would differ only in the changelog
>> and the postrm, which would lack these lines:
>>
>> for oldconffile in
(as you prefer) the variable and function declarations used
therein (which make up about 85 of the 300 lines of the postrm).
Would you agree with such a fix?
TIA, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 13:31:30 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> Ondřej Surý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Affected source packages:
>> >
>> > Package: tetex-bin
>> > Package: texl
t will require NEW processing. Should we separate these two
steps in order to get the poppler change in as soon as possible, or just
go ahead?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 08:56:28AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> Now that the debhelper change has been reverted, we can't rebuild
>> texlive with fixed tex-common. We need to upload a reverted tex-common,
>> and th
namely that context is installed at all -
I think we've got some dependencies wrong, but I don't see it.
Hm, or it's a problem with the buildd log: the commandline in the buildd log
installs only texlive packages, but actualy tetex-bin is installed,
too. And that pulls in conte
tal. Then we'd be ready with any
Debian-specific changes as soon as 2008 is released, and already have
some testing of major changes.
I also expect that pdftex (the major moving component) will continue to
change only slowly and without any disruptive changes, even more so now
that luat
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:43:40AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > For the upcoming stable distribution (etch) these problems have been
>> > fixed in version 1
s in etch,
but it doesn't seem proper to announce the availability in a DSA if it's
not yet true...
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
(build-package): Added dependency on the "clean" target.
>
> -- Davide G. M. Salvetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:43:56 +0100
> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
RMs, can this still be unblocked, even if it's N-19?
Rega
have time for an upload? I think I could do an NMU on
Wednesday, maybe tomorrow.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
ors running
"debconf-updatepo"; thanks to Thomas Huriaux and Frank Küster.
(Closes: #407215)
* rules.in (DFILES): Removed "debian/<:=${PACKAGE}:>/templates": it
should not be deleted at clean time.
(build): Added dependency on "debian/po/temp
er you. I forgot to remove the "question to RMs
below" after we talked on IRC.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
approval.
The upload to t-p-u is necessary because fuse in sid has a new upstream
version, and a package compiled against this version cannot propagate to
etch. vorlon suggested version numbers 1.13.1-7 for unstable and
1.13.1-6+etch1 for testing-proposed-updates. I think -7 must be
uploaded first.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Frank Küster kuesterei.ch> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> with the maintainers' consent, I have just tried to upload
> fuse_2.5.3_4.2 to testing-proposed-updates, fixing bug #409644 for etch.
>
> It didn't work, claiming there was already such a version in the "
se
(18:13:48) jcristau: I'd have grepped for packages Depending on libfuse2
(18:17:09) fant: jcristau: That gives essentially the same.
s/libfusefs-ruby/libfusefs-ruby1.8/;s/linux-ntfs/ntfsprogs/;s/sshfs-fuse/sshfs/
(18:17:16) fant: (pluse libfuse-dev)
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Mol
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> unblock tex-common/1.0.1
>
> Unblocked.
Thanks
>> If you feel you cannot review the debdiff, I could also apply the
>> necessary changes to the te
pply the
necessary changes to the texlive-lang source package as currently in
etch. The problem with that is that we would not have anything in our
repository that corresponds to this upload, therefore I would prefer not
to take this option
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectr
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:25:42AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> > You say that while later on you claimed not to understand everything about
>> > the
>> > package (update script). Don't you have the impressio
else. It would be more productive if you
could be more explicit what you are referring to. Naturally someone who
has only had a short look at the package knows it much worse than you,
even if I have a different way to look at things and found out
(correctly or not) that it's simple to fi
wiki1.7 why don't you
> just put up a complete patch instead of only one of the things to do ?
> If then it looks good, I would apply it happily.
Hm, I didn't do it mostly because if I send a complete patch, I don't do
that without exhaustive testing. And this I di
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:17:41AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> > It's at least an order of magnitude more complicated (=error-prone) than
>> > the
>> > solution Romain has implemented,
>
>> That&#
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:54:38PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> To me that looks a bit more complicated than one would like, but still
>> quite manageable, and acceptable for fixing a RC bug in etch.
>
>> What do you thi
bug relies on dvidvi_1.0-9
entering etch (if it doesn't, there's a new bug "no dvidvi for texlive
users").
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le mercredi 21 février 2007 12:54, Frank Küster a écrit :
>> To me that looks a bit more complicated than one would like, but still
>> quite manageable, and acceptable for fixing a RC bug in etch.
>
> Not that I don'
eable, and acceptable for fixing a RC bug in etch.
What do you think?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
ling in
postinst and config must be rewritten).
All nothing that requires magic.
I just didn't write a complete patch because I am not sure of the
purpose of the upgrade code in config/postinst.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>> Dear release team,
>>
>> Martin Michlmayr has discovered that the latest bugfix in dvipdfm
>> (tetex-bin and texlive-bin) was not correct, the segfault in half-hour
>> timezones was replaced by
>0)? '+':'-', labs(tz_offset)/3600,
(labs(tz_offset)/60)%60);
(tz_offset is a long int)
The packages are currently in incoming.
TIA, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
he security fixes.
The only remark that I can make is that you should send out requests for
translations, since you've changed templates so late in the release
cycle.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 12:33:54PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Varun Hiremath wrote:
>> >> Dear Release Team,
>> >>Please consider unblocki
cked tree, to make it disappear from
the debian diff. Again closes: #401099. Thanks to Filipus Klutiero
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for his work on this issue.
-- Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:46:43 +0100
That's a RC licensing bug that aba tried t
were targetted at
etch. However, I cannot find and unfreeze request, or other discussion
related to libgd2, on -release.
What are the release team's and maintainer's plans for that package?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
lear: That's a RC bug, hence the urgency and the wish to
have this in etch.
Thanks for considering, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Philippe Cloutier ulaval.ca> writes:
> Romain Beauxis a écrit :
> >It is serious regarding the policy violation.
> >However, I do not want to set it to serious as for
> >now because of what Steve said.
> >
> >
> What Steve said is for #393962 but not #388616.
I'm not a member of the release t
409162)
-- Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:55:26 +0100
tex-common (0.44) unstable; urgency=low
* Use full pathname when registering files with ucf (closes: #408263)
* New and updated debconf translations:
- Galician by Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ucf bug. Lamont fixed it in an NMU, but with
urgency=low, which helps the unstable buildds, but not users of etch who
want to purge packages.
Release team, would you please consider to increase the urgency of ucf,
so that it won't need ten days until it's fixed in etch?
Regards, Frank
with
urgency=low will be included in etch, but after that we cannot promise
anything."
Do you think this will be possible?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
this bug, and
take care that it really migrates after the 5 days.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 10:02:24AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> which adds a russian debconf translation and registers documentation in
>> section "TeX", consistent with the other packages in etch.
>
> Consis
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Attached is the source debdiff.
Sorry, it's here.
Frank
diff -Nru /tmp/ff6bPhofak/tex-common-0.42/debian/changelog
/tmp/u9NttmjY92/tex-common-0.43/debian/changelog
--- /tmp/ff6bPhofak/tex-common-0.42/debian/changelog200
ny substitutions)
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Version: [-0.42-] {+0.43+}
$
Attached is the source debdiff. BTW, you've noticed the confusion about
unblocking texlive-bin?
Thanks in advance, Frank
--
Dr. Frank K
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CCing Frank Küster and the tex team.
Cc'ing Davide in addition, he's the auctex maintainer.
> * Hendrik Naumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-09 18:50]:
>> Hi
>>
>> The removal of this package breaks the
;t add mktexlsr calls to the postinst/postrm script of texlive
package, as it does not contain 'real' files (Closes: #400369)
* add an updated dcpic.sty to texlive-pictures (Closes: #388653)
I wish you a happy new year no matter whether you unblock it or not.
Regards, Frank
--
atiently until Norbert
returns next year ;-)).
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
lay in a different
league.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 07:01:23PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Dear release team,
>
>> I have just uploaded this package to unstable. It inherits urgency=high
>> from -4, you might want to give it more time, see below.
ime I've done that, including from one of the outdated etch
versions that this code is supposed to clean up after.
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
diff -u tetex-base-3.0.dfsg.3/debian/postrm.in
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061219 09:06]:
>> But I'd still like to have advice from the release team: Should we
>> upload tetex-base (currently 7 days old, unblocked) now, with
>> urgency=high, or is the bug not
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Release Managers,
>
> do you consider the following scenario release-critical? If yes, we
> have more than one RC bug:
>
> - $packagemanager install B X
> - package A is unpacked
> - package B which Depends: A is u
that many more packages suffer from this problem.
And actually each command used in any "postrm remove" can become
dependent on "configuredness" by later uploads of the depended-on
package, so this is a general problem for all types of packages.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küst
r in order to decide
whether it can be done someone who knows about C libraries needs to look
at the code and perhaps at the code of packages that use libpng and have
recently had a new upstream version.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
unaffected.
> Frank's plan provides a good starting point when that time comes for
> each Tetex user when the switch to Texlive becomes inescapable.
I wholeheartedly agree with Mike's arguments.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
e new bugs *introduced* after the start of
> the freeze.
Understood, thank you.
> If patches are going to be submitted following careful testing, that's
> another question entirely.
Yep. But then we won't need any ignore tags :-)
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Singl
s or whatever to find what is necessary.
> Maintainers should know this.
I have started to write a "receipe" for maintainers. After the next
sync pull (I think a couple of minutes after 21:00 UTC), it should be at
http://pkg-tetex.alioth.debian.org/mapping-texlive.html
Regards, Frank
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 20:34]:
>> [...]
>
> tex-common approved.
Thank you. You gave positive feedback about letting tetex-base in, but
didn't add a hint yet. Just forgotten, or are we waiting for
remove aleph from testing - any NMUing won't make
sense without doing the actual work of packaging afnix.
To me it seems as if the current situation is better than having no
aleph/afnix at all. However, it violates the release policy.
What should we do?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küste
e" metapackage does not cover the complete teTeX, whereas
texlive-full pulls in really everything, about 2 Gigabyte of files. And
it doesn't make sense to introduce new metapackages that map teTeX's
buggy splitting scheme on the texlive packages.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
bug that can be easily worked around, by documenting the
packages that need to be installed manually
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This e-mail is about tex-common, I'll send separate mails for the other
> packages. I will upload tex-common_0.42 this evening, unless I learn
> that we need to revert anything, so it is "-1 days" old:
>
> te
Hi,
Danai pointed me to one more issue.
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Apply patch from upstream to pdftex that allows it to work properly
> with CJK fonts with their large number of subfonts. Many thanks to
> Thanh Han The <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
ng, it's just useless, neither does it's removal.
Are you willing to let this in as it is? Or should we revert the code
changes (I hope, not the doc-base registering) to get a
documentation-only update?
So far for tex-common,
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectr
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 18:17]:
>> we have a couple of TeX-related packages waiting and would like to ask
>> you to give permission for testing migration once they are old enough.
>> We'll notify you
d on texlive and
closes: #399967.
* Patch texdoctk so that it still works if documentation in TeXlive's as
well as teTeX's TEXMFDIST is present. Thanks to Braun Gabor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for reporting and Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for ideas for fixing th
| the same time. Thanks to Braun Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for reporting
| and Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for ideas for fixing this
| (closes: #400058)
|
| -- Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 6 Dec 2006 22:19:02 +0100
|
| tetex-bin (3.0-25) unstable; u
x27;re not restarting it for you."
+ fi
+fi
;;
*)
;;
If you think some of the changes are inappropriate, we'd like to know
what we need to revert to get at least the "register to doc-base" and
corresponding "do not install manual dhelp file" in.
at nobody
seems to be able to deal with, and you think it might be related to TeX
somehow, please drop us a mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which I continue to read.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
ly is RC.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
ented? The developers' reference talks about
removal requests, but not about bug severities...
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
