Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 19:45 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 20:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
- add an appropriate fixed version to #612924, which right now claims
version to #612924, which right now claims
not to be fixed in any version
- prepare an updated package and send a debdiff to -release for an ack
Ping?
Pong. I've got it on my radar, but wasn't able to spend any time on the
issue. Maybe this week.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Sprecher B90
an
upload with the line commented?
Regards, Frank
Frank Küster fr...@debian.org wrote:
Dear stable release managers,
we have a bug report against our package texlive-base in stable that
might be worth fixing in squeeze, or not. Therefore I am asking your
opinion.
There is buggy code
there - and it will find its way into Debian.
Lionel is not aware of this mechanism, so it is only natural what he
suggests. Which is essentially what we do, just not by firing up an
editor on debian/copyright.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Sprecher B90/Grüne OV Miltenberg und Umgebung
VCD Miltenberg
googling for ucs.dtx gives some hits in comp.text.tex from this
year, talking about taking over maintainership by Wolfgang Jeltsch.
There is a ucs.dtx at
http://softbase.org/latex-unicode/
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Sprecher B90/Grüne OV Miltenberg und Umgebung
VCD Miltenberg, ADFC Aschaffenburg
-resurrect_conffile_sid /etc/texmf/tex/generic/config/pdftexconfig.tex
texlive-base $1 $2
+#resurrect_conffile_sid /etc/texmf/tex/generic/config/pdftexconfig.tex
texlive-base $1 $2
plus the usual changelog etc.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Vorstand B90/Grüne OV Miltenberg und Umgebung
VCD Miltenberg, ADFC
, err, what's the successor of squeeze
going to be called?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
VCD Miltenberg, ADFC Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
of that would be ridiculous.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
VCD Miltenberg, ADFC Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
-base-bin-doc
and then the package should go away smoothly, without any problems
during dist-upgrade?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
recommend anyone to use Debian's TeXLive in squeeze,
would it be TL 2007.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
nothing new in here - I just noticed the [SRM] tag in the subject and
thought I'd rather resend with it included. Fullquote following,
Regards, Frank
Frank Küster fr...@kuesterei.ch wrote:
Dear release managers,
I am right now uploading an again-installable tetex-bin to
oldstable
show up soon)?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
---
texk/tetex/fmtutil | 50 --
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: tetex-bin
of days until we have decided (together with upstream)
which approach to take.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
is
already installed before the upgrade, or the new, not-buggy package
would be unpacked without tex-common present.)
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
\fmtversion{2005/12/01}
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
-- debconf information:
tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
tex-common/check_texmf_missing:
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a considerable number of changes. Nearly all of them seem to be
related to the build failure, but I'm not sure.
The general freeze exceptions file contains version 1.18 - does that
mean we only need to consider the changes from 1.17 to 1.18?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
as explained in my earlier mails, I request that you grant a
lenny-ignore tag to bug
#477060 texlive-base: license of amslatex is unclear
Sorry for the delay. Done, also for #483217.
Many thanks to you
compiles and
maybe code fixes.
Which I do not expect, since
- the TeX team is no less overworked since I first asked the release
team about the issue in July, and
- the release team doesn't seem to have any manpower to handle this.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive
Hi Adeodato,
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es writes:
After reviewing, I think everything is fine for lenny. I've added an
unblock.
Now that you have touched tex-common, will you also be responsible for our
question regarding the remaining texlive RC bugs? Or is someone else
responsible?
Hi all,
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear release team,
I kindly request your advice on handling three RC bugs in TeXLive
packages,
will someone among you find time to handle this issue? You are probably
aware that the texlive cannot simply be removed if their RC bug seems
to tipa.
I'd appreciate your comments,
Frank
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the default install of our copy of the PS base fonts
once the TeX Gyre fonts, their improved successors, are available in
Debian.
Do you generally oppose such ideas? If not, which approach would you
suggest?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f
...
The change is not avoidable. I think it's better to make it clear
*now*.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
a new snapshot every 10 days ;-)
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
learn about users' needs, without bothering whether some package is
broken by this.
- It would be nice if tetex-doc, and therefore the complete tetex-base
source package, could be removed.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ
Hi,
I wonder why nobody answered to this - when and/or how will it be
decided whether this is a release goal?
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Release Team,
the TeX Task Force proposes the following release goal:
No dependencies (Depends/Recommends/Suggests/Build-Depends{-Indep
like new (release goal).
P.P.S. Martin, I didn't hear from you about the who's contact for the
TeX team question, I guess that's just because you were busy, not
because my two e-mails got lost?
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
Otavio Salvador otavio at debian.org writes:
Frank Küster frank at debian.org writes:
Sorry for the late answer, I'm not subscribed to -release and didn't see this
follow-up. Please Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you reply, I can't do that in
the gmane interface.
Frank Küster frank at debian.org
processing. Should we separate these two
steps in order to get the poppler change in as soon as possible, or just
go ahead?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
we've got some dependencies wrong, but I don't see it.
Hm, or it's a problem with the buildd log: the commandline in the buildd log
installs only texlive packages, but actualy tetex-bin is installed,
too. And that pulls in context.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 08:56:28AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Now that the debhelper change has been reverted, we can't rebuild
texlive with fixed tex-common. We need to upload a reverted tex-common,
and then rebuild texlive. Until this has happened
as 2008 is released, and already have
some testing of major changes.
I also expect that pdftex (the major moving component) will continue to
change only slowly and without any disruptive changes, even more so now
that luatex exists.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule
seem proper to announce the availability in a DSA if it's
not yet true...
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:43:40AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the upcoming stable distribution (etch) these problems have been
fixed in version 1.4.6-2.
However, etch still has 1.4.6-1, and no freeze
, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
-updatepo; thanks to Thomas Huriaux and Frank Küster.
(Closes: #407215)
* rules.in (DFILES): Removed debian/:=${PACKAGE}:/templates: it
should not be deleted at clean time.
(build): Added dependency on debian/po/templates.pot.
(clean): Added dependency on debian/po/templates.pot
and
1.13.1-6+etch1 for testing-proposed-updates. I think -7 must be
uploaded first.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
talked on IRC.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
for packages Depending on libfuse2
(18:17:09) fant: jcristau: That gives essentially the same.
s/libfusefs-ruby/libfusefs-ruby1.8/;s/linux-ntfs/ntfsprogs/;s/sshfs-fuse/sshfs/
(18:17:16) fant: (pluse libfuse-dev)
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f
Frank Küster frank at kuesterei.ch writes:
Hi,
with the maintainers' consent, I have just tried to upload
fuse_2.5.3_4.2 to testing-proposed-updates, fixing bug #409644 for etch.
It didn't work, claiming there was already such a version in the Done
directory. Apparently someone else
-lang source package as currently in
etch. The problem with that is that we would not have anything in our
repository that corresponds to this upload, therefore I would prefer not
to take this option
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
unblock tex-common/1.0.1
Unblocked.
Thanks
If you feel you cannot review the debdiff, I could also apply the
necessary changes to the texlive-lang source package as currently in
etch. The problem
,
even if I have a different way to look at things and found out
(correctly or not) that it's simple to fix the configuration file location.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:25:42AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
You say that while later on you claimed not to understand everything about
the
package (update script). Don't you have the impression that this judgement
is
also based
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:17:41AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
It's at least an order of magnitude more complicated (=error-prone) than
the
solution Romain has implemented,
That's correct, not solving the FHS violation is simpler than doing
exhaustive testing. And this I didn't want to do on a bug
that had an etch-ignore tag. But it seems the tag is based on
incomplete information about options to solve the bug, isn't it?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:54:38PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
To me that looks a bit more complicated than one would like, but still
quite manageable, and acceptable for fixing a RC bug in etch.
What do you think?
It's at least an order of magnitude
. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 21 février 2007 12:54, Frank Küster a écrit :
To me that looks a bit more complicated than one would like, but still
quite manageable, and acceptable for fixing a RC bug in etch.
Not that I don't see any solution, but I would prefer
on dvidvi_1.0-9
entering etch (if it doesn't, there's a new bug no dvidvi for texlive
users).
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
of the upgrade code in config/postinst.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
)/3600,
(labs(tz_offset)/60)%60);
(tz_offset is a long int)
The packages are currently in incoming.
TIA, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Dear release team,
Martin Michlmayr has discovered that the latest bugfix in dvipdfm
(tetex-bin and texlive-bin) was not correct, the segfault in half-hour
timezones was replaced by a segfault on amd64 (and probably other 64bit
arches
should send out requests for
translations, since you've changed templates so late in the release
cycle.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 12:33:54PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Varun Hiremath wrote:
Dear Release Team,
Please consider unblocking dvipng 1.9-2.
Changelog:
dvipng (1.9-2) unstable; urgency=high
discussion
related to libgd2, on -release.
What are the release team's and maintainer's plans for that package?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
it disappear from
the debian diff. Again closes: #401099. Thanks to Filipus Klutiero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for his work on this issue.
-- Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:46:43 +0100
That's a RC licensing bug that aba tried to fix by removing the file
from the orig.tar.gz
to
have this in etch.
Thanks for considering, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
to Eddy Petrișor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (closes: #409267)
- New Portuguese Brazilian translation, thanks to the Traduz
MailingList [EMAIL PROTECTED] (closes: #408866)
- Updated Catalan translation, thanks to Guillem Jover
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (closes: #409162)
-- Frank Küster
Philippe Cloutier philippe.cloutier.2 at ulaval.ca writes:
Romain Beauxis a écrit :
It is serious regarding the policy violation.
However, I do not want to set it to serious as for
now because of what Steve said.
What Steve said is for #393962 but not #388616.
I'm not a member of the
, but with
urgency=low, which helps the unstable buildds, but not users of etch who
want to purge packages.
Release team, would you please consider to increase the urgency of ucf,
so that it won't need ten days until it's fixed in etch?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein
that we cannot promise
anything.
Do you think this will be possible?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
days.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
)
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Version: [-0.42-] {+0.43+}
$
Attached is the source debdiff. BTW, you've noticed the confusion about
unblocking texlive-bin?
Thanks in advance, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is the source debdiff.
Sorry, it's here.
Frank
diff -Nru /tmp/ff6bPhofak/tex-common-0.42/debian/changelog
/tmp/u9NttmjY92/tex-common-0.43/debian/changelog
--- /tmp/ff6bPhofak/tex-common-0.42/debian/changelog2006-12-11
19:46:53.0
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CCing Frank Küster and the tex team.
Cc'ing Davide in addition, he's the auctex maintainer.
* Hendrik Naumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-09 18:50]:
Hi
The removal of this package breaks the preview feature in xemacs21,
which brings its own autex
;-)).
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
calls to the postinst/postrm script of texlive
package, as it does not contain 'real' files (Closes: #400369)
* add an updated dcpic.sty to texlive-pictures (Closes: #388653)
I wish you a happy new year no matter whether you unblock it or not.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 07:01:23PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Dear release team,
I have just uploaded this package to unstable. It inherits urgency=high
from -4, you might want to give it more time, see below.
Reviewed and hinted. Andi, please drop
that this code is supposed to clean up after.
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
diff -u tetex-base-3.0.dfsg.3/debian/postrm.in
tetex-base-3.0.dfsg.3/debian/postrm.in
--- tetex-base-3.0.dfsg.3/debian
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Release Managers,
do you consider the following scenario release-critical? If yes, we
have more than one RC bug:
- $packagemanager install B X
- package A is unpacked
- package B which Depends: A is unpacked
- package X which is unrelated
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061219 09:06]:
But I'd still like to have advice from the release team: Should we
upload tetex-base (currently 7 days old, unblocked) now, with
urgency=high, or is the bug not RC and we should wait until the current
this problem.
And actually each command used in any postrm remove can become
dependent on configuredness by later uploads of the depended-on
package, so this is a general problem for all types of packages.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f
libraries needs to look
at the code and perhaps at the code of packages that use libpng and have
recently had a new upstream version.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
comes for
each Tetex user when the switch to Texlive becomes inescapable.
I wholeheartedly agree with Mike's arguments.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
of
the freeze.
Understood, thank you.
If patches are going to be submitted following careful testing, that's
another question entirely.
Yep. But then we won't need any ignore tags :-)
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 20:34]:
[...]
tex-common approved.
Thank you. You gave positive feedback about letting tetex-base in, but
didn't add a hint yet. Just forgotten, or are we waiting for something?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr
started to write a receipe for maintainers. After the next
sync pull (I think a couple of minutes after 21:00 UTC), it should be at
http://pkg-tetex.alioth.debian.org/mapping-texlive.html
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ
pulls in really everything, about 2 Gigabyte of files. And
it doesn't make sense to introduce new metapackages that map teTeX's
buggy splitting scheme on the texlive packages.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
- any NMUing won't make
sense without doing the actual work of packaging afnix.
To me it seems as if the current situation is better than having no
aleph/afnix at all. However, it violates the release policy.
What should we do?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
diff -u tetex-base-3.0.dfsg.3/debian/rules.d/install.mk
tetex-base-3.0.dfsg.3/debian/rules.d/install.mk
--- tetex-base-3.0.dfsg.3/debian/rules.d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for reporting
| and Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] for ideas for fixing this
| (closes: #400058)
|
| -- Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 6 Dec 2006 22:19:02 +0100
|
| tetex-bin (3.0-25) unstable; urgency=low
|
| * Simplify README.Debian, it now just points to tex
if documentation in TeXlive's as
well as teTeX's TEXMFDIST is present. Thanks to Braun Gabor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for reporting and Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for ideas for fixing this (closes: #401930)
-- Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 6 Dec 2006 22:40:27 +0100
The second item is exactly
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 18:17]:
we have a couple of TeX-related packages waiting and would like to ask
you to give permission for testing migration once they are old enough.
We'll notify you again when each of them has had it's time
willing to let this in as it is? Or should we revert the code
changes (I hope, not the doc-base registering) to get a
documentation-only update?
So far for tex-common,
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
Hi,
Danai pointed me to one more issue.
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Apply patch from upstream to pdftex that allows it to work properly
with CJK fonts with their large number of subfonts. Many thanks to
Thanh Han The [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jie Luo
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This e-mail is about tex-common, I'll send separate mails for the other
packages. I will upload tex-common_0.42 this evening, unless I learn
that we need to revert anything, so it is -1 days old:
tex-common, mostly documentation fixes:
,
| tex
. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
to be able to deal with, and you think it might be related to TeX
somehow, please drop us a mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which I continue to read.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
reassign 392863 ftp.debian.org
retitle 392863 Please remove obsolete preview-latex package
thanks
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Makoto, hi Davide,
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: preview-latex
Version: 0.9.1-4
Severity: serious
Hello Makoto
? The developers' reference talks about
removal requests, but not about bug severities...
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
archive).
However, the upload was done with low urgency and still needs 7 days to
get into testing. I suggest to bump the urgency to high or medium - and
probably cdbs also needs to be unblocked.
TIA, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, the upload was done with low urgency and still needs 7 days to
get into testing. I suggest to bump the urgency to high or medium - and
probably cdbs also needs to be unblocked.
Added urgent
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, the upload was done with low urgency and still needs 7 days to
get into testing. I suggest to bump
Dear release team,
I'm not sure about your policies in these things, but maybe this
progress already warrants an etch-ignore tag?
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theppitak, do you have any news on the licensing? Just
db2latex-xsl \) -o \
\( -F Build-Depends-Indep db2latex-xsl \) -o \
\( -F Depends db2latex-xsl \) -o \
\( -F Recommends db2latex-xsl \) -o \
\( -F Suggests db2latex-xsl \) \
/var/lib/apt/lists/*Sources
Package: cdbs
Package: cdbs
$
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein
, I've reported a bug against
dblatex, with a patch.
When will that be applied?
I don't know - but as I said, it is just cosmetics, since the PS
creation is not needed.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
Hi Release team and ftp-masters,
this is a ping and a suggestion how to proceed.
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061019 18:53]:
http://bts.turmzimmer.net/ shows that cjk-latex was removed from testing
last night. However, the bug that is referenced
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
